• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can Ramsay MacDonald be considered a Traitor to the Labour Party?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent can Ramsay MacDonald be considered a Traitor to the Labour Party? There is no doubt that MacDonald was a traitor to his party but he wasn't a traitor to the nation. He wanted to make what he considered the best decision in the long term for the good of the nation as a whole, the debate is more about why MacDonald betrayed his party than whether or not he did. There are two opposing theories on how MacDonald should be remembered, one that suggests that MacDonald was not a traitor due to his long standing devotion to the labour party. The differences he has made to it and it's profile over the years that he was leader, and that the policy that divided the labour party was 'the best solution in the circumstances', and the necessity for him to put nation over party left him little choice the view shared by Robert Pearce, Austen Morgan, Marquand and Kenneth O. Morgan. MacDonald had a bad end even though he did a lot for the labour party, he was unlucky to be involved at the time. Other historians such as AJP Taylor, dismiss his decision to follow the idea of unemployment benefit cuts as a betrayal of Socialist ideals, and believe he should have gone down fighting for Socialism, MacDonald put country over party leading to a rift within labour thus he betrayed them. ...read more.


They felt that if the policy of unemployment benefit was necessary then it should be introduced by other parties, otherwise they would be betraying 'their people', the unemployed. The labour party didn't want to put their name to a policy that went against the people that they were representing. In their eyes he should not do anything to harm the base of their party even if it means loosing office. They were the people who supported them in the election so they shouldn't be the ones burdened when trying to save the economy. If Labour did make cuts in Unemployment benefit it would mean that the Trade Unions would also stop supporting labour, something that MacDonald had wanted from sometime. "His decision to make the Labour Party a national rather than a Trade Union or class party" MacDonald had made it common knowledge in the past that he wanted Labour to become independent from the trades unions allowing them to follow policy that they believed was in their interests and not that of the unions. The issue that is prompted by this argument, is that if MacDonald had had an ulterior motive he gained little from the outcome, "If indeed he betrayed the labour party, his rewards were singularly few" Written by AJP Taylor in his book, "British Prime Ministers and other Essays", Taylor is likely to be critical of the Labour party in general due to his past involvement with them. ...read more.


nation and party, conscience and popularity, right and wrong in his mind, he chose the nation and to do the correct thing in his mind, thus betraying the party that he had devoted so much to. He was unlucky to be in the situation that he was in, he stood by what he believed was right and didn't give in. The rest of the Labour Party also saw that they could not resolve the problems of the country they were a relatively young party, and many had little experience in office. Although few believed that MacDonald was wrong in what he wanted it was on principle that the cabinet voted against him. Believing that if the Labour Party were to act, which they had to, they should go down fighting for socialism. Overall, MacDonald was a founder of the labour Party and thus cannot be considered as a traitor. He couldn't find an alternative and felt that the only opportunity that there was, was to implement the benefit cuts. He did betray the socialist ideas but he did what he felt he had to do therefore he was a traitor to the Labour party as a whole yet he was such an important factor in the success of the party that to some extent he can be forgiven for his judgement of the situation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - This essay demonstrates strong command of the subject, wider reading and good critical vocabulary. A fair and appropriate conclusion is implicitly reached following ongoing evaluation throughout the essay.
The weaknesses in the essay are in it's structure and organisation - there is little evidence of a logical plan: points do not logically follow on from each other, there is considerable repetition of general points and at times it lapses into narrative above analysis. Also the layout of the essay is confusing and the footnotes are not applied to the main body of the piece. The essay would be clearer with a definition of key terms and setting of historical context, a paragraph on the extent to which MacDonald cannot be considered a traitor, the counter-argument and an evaluation of both sides before a conclusion is reached.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. To what extent are there differences between the Labour and Conservative parties over policies ...

    An acceptance of limited Welfare as necessity and a focus on voluntarism and community without coercion [Old Labour]. Despite adopting a great amount of similar policies and ideas, the two parties still do share a few key differences in policy.

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    It will have effect of raising awareness of issues among the public, and of providing information to help make decisions. This has certainly been true of recent referendums held in the UK on a range of issues such as mayoral and regional government.

  1. To what extent is Parliament representative?

    results in a collapse in power through protest, since they are no longer representing the people. Furthermore, if a politician only acts in accordance Lastly, representation can be gained through general elections, since our multi-party system means that a range of opinion and belief, no matter how extreme, is on offer for the electorate to choose.

  2. To what extent are judges neutral and independent?

    Thirdly is the strict process of appointments into the judiciary. Despite the fact that the Lord Chancellor and the PM jointly appoint higher judges, any obvious political bias would cause an uproar in Parliament, damaging the government, so they tend not to do this to save face, which means that

  1. How far do you agreewith the proposition; the cabinet is dead?

    It is where major policies get endorsed by all members of the government and any crisis - be it war or fuel shortage - will be managed by some of its members. It has power in the sense that it would put the 'brakes' on a Prime Minister or a radical minister.

  2. Some differences and similarities between the Australian and United States federal legislatures

    Voting is compulsory for all State and Commonwealth elections. Elections for the lower House use preferential voting. Elections for the upper House use proportional representation. Voting is not compulsory. Elections for both houses use the simple majority or "first past the post" system.

  1. To what extent did Ramsay Macdonald betray his party in1931?

    However, this view is not widely accepted by many modern historians. Historian Norman Lowe accuses Macdonald of being: 'vain, ambitious and out of touch with the grass-roots of the party' Ramsay Macdonald can only truly be judged as a traitor if he knew before the National Government was formed that he would be heading it.

  2. To what extent are the major UK parties, internally united over ideas and policies

    Issues like these which have cause a great political split amongst the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives traditional and modern members. Consequently, the above reasons implements why there has been political disunity within the parties to a large extent and why I believe that the disunity amongst the Liberal Democrat and Conservatives are roughly 80%.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work