• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent could the USA still be described as having an "imperial Presidency"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent could the USA still be described as having an "imperial Presidency"? The presidency can still be called an "imperial Presidency" to an extent, because there has been a growth in the president powers and how they use them. Thing like how the president is able to go to war with out congress declaring war, or how con do things when congress is out off session, and they escape the constraints imposed by checks and balances. When you look at what president have done with congress knowing or with out the agreement of congress, things like in 1964 when President Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon was the Gulf of Tonkin resolution passed by congress, which was the only authority that they had to go to war in Vietnam, which led to 58,000 lives lost, they had no declaration of war only this resolution. This only came out by an alleged attack on American vessels by North Vietnamese forces, which was something that LBJ cook up so he could get the backing of congress to go to war. ...read more.

Middle

When you look at the domestic powers of the president, they appeared to have largely escaped the constrains imposed by a system of constitutional checks and balances. Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr made six principal charges against the Nixon administration, like that he pursed a policy of impoundment, by which funded allocated by Congress for a particular purpose were not spent, it enforced the law selectively choosing for example not to enforce parts of the Civil Rights Act that would cut off federal funding to school districts discriminating against minority students. It is said that present's aides in the Executive Office of the President, people like John Ehrlichman and H.R.Haldeman, wielded much more power than cabinet officials who headed federal departments such as Defence and the Treasury, Haldeman is said to have used his position as White House chief-of-staff to ensure that very few individuals had access to the president, so in fact that he could end up controlling policy and the presidency as only people who could have made huge money donation to the party and president, also the administration had used government agencies to pursue personal vendettas and silence critics. ...read more.

Conclusion

He also can use a pocket veto, but only at the end off a congressional session. The president also has the power under the 1976 National Emergency, which in these times people will rally around the president, and he can gain a lot of support from this, like after the 11/9 attacks, the president gain a lot of support in the after the attacks. So the president has had more power, with making changes in laws, but how the president are now using the powers that they have, like the fact they have found ways around not getting to agreement by congress that is often needed. This is allowed the president to get polices that he wants through, get changes to bill he wants, and even use troops with out congress declaring war, so the presidency has become more powerful in that way, as now he getting away with things and doing what he wants, but not yet upsetting the country over it nor losing popularity over it, and maybe running there re-election campaign in it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    Time is constantly ticking. Lives are in danger. The third aspect is that of limited culpability. The system of checks and balances does work. The framers of the constitution did provide for judicial recourse to excesses of executive power proving that the president is not beyond the law.

  2. To what extent is ‘ imperial presidency’ an accurate description of the US president?

    However, despite this being an obvious area for the abuse of power, many consider it necessary in order for the country to react swiftly to a situation; an argument made stronger when we consider the possible time a Bill takes to be passed.

  1. "An admirable and enlightened example of international co-operation.' Does the congress System (1815-25) deserve ...

    By that definition of the word "peace", it was clearly, and should be no doubt, that the Congress System could help maintain the peace in Europe. Since the Congress System had started, there was no international war nearly for 40 years, until the Crimean War that started in 1853.

  2. 'Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of ...

    The result of this movement and its consequences highlighted Jinnah's warning at the Nagpur Congress Session in 1920 saying, that, " you are making a declaration of Swaraj (home rule) within a year and committing the Indian National Congress to a programme, which you cannot carry out."21 Though Jinnah's worst

  1. Was Bush an imperial President ?

    His imperialism was further highlighted when he set up the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay and created a virtual state of limbo for the detainees.

  2. Is the USA still a federal state?

    However one must explore the reasoning behind the passing of these measures that characterized a ?big government?. Bushes? presidency was largely characterised by events to which he arguably reacted to. Consider 9/11; had this event not occurred would the Patriot Act and other respective security measures be legislated for?

  1. Discuss the view that the presidency is not a powerful office

    of legislation, whilst Reagan directive that federal money should not be used to advocate abortions. Eisenhower?s use of constitutional powers to desegregate schools is also an example of the impact, thus arguably the importance and power of these constitutional powers.

  2. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    Considering that the United States has led the world in all modern major technological developments, you have to consider the value of such in terms of global power. Key indicators for technological leadership are hard to come by but a look at educational trends can give some glimpse into at

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work