To what extent could the USA still be described as having an "imperial Presidency"?

Authors Avatar

To what extent could the USA still be described as having an “imperial Presidency”?

        The presidency can still be called an “imperial Presidency” to an extent, because there has been a growth in the president powers and how they use them. Thing like how the president is able to go to war with out congress declaring war, or how con do things when congress is out off session, and they escape the constraints imposed by checks and balances.

        When you look at what president have done with congress knowing or with out the agreement of congress, things like in 1964 when President Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon was the Gulf of Tonkin resolution passed by congress, which was the only authority that they had to go to war in Vietnam, which led to 58,000 lives lost, they had no declaration of war only this resolution. This only came out by an alleged attack on American vessels by North Vietnamese forces, which was something that LBJ cook up so he could get the backing of congress to go to war.  This is how an imperial leader would work, but just doing no matter what.  There have been other cases where a president has used forces with out congress agreement. In 1983 when US marines occupied Grenada and removed the left- wing regime from power, rapid military success and widespread public support for the invasion enabled the Reagan administration to keep members of congress relegated to the sidelines. Or then again in 1986 when the Reagan administration order American air attacks on targets in Libya, Congressional members were invited to the White House only as US bombers were approaching Libya, so they could not do anything to stop it. The in 1989 President Bush send US troops into Panama, where the country’s military leader General Manuel Noriega, who had been accused of involvement in the international drug trade was arrested by US forces, the invasion took place while congress was out of session. This show that the president is being able to get away with things, and even pull congress in line with him.

Join now!

        When you look at the domestic powers of the president, they appeared to have largely escaped the constrains imposed by a system of constitutional checks and balances. Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr made six principal charges against the Nixon administration, like that he pursed a policy of impoundment, by which funded allocated by Congress for a particular purpose were not spent, it enforced the law selectively choosing for example not to enforce parts of the Civil Rights Act that would cut off federal funding to school districts discriminating against minority students. It is said that present’s aides in the Executive Office ...

This is a preview of the whole essay