• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with Saint-Just's comment - "The Republic (1st Republic of France 1792-95) consists of the extermination of everything that opposes it"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Do You Agree With Saint-Just's Comment: "The Republic (1st Republic of France 1792-95) Consists of the Extermination of Everything That Opposes It"? A revolution in which power was passed through many different classes of people would most definitely be the French Revolution. Many different leaders with contrasting political opinions controlled France for certain amounts of time, however, the most extreme leader was Robespierre, supported by Saint-Just. The Jacobins, under Robespierre, believed that terror was the only way to implement their political ideas on others, and Saint-Just concurred with this belief, stating that the Republic consisted of the extermination of its opposition. Even though the Republic had other objectives, it did consist, to a certain extent, of the extermination of everything that opposed it. The results of public revolt showed that the Republic consisted of the extermination of everything that opposed it, as these revolts only occurred because of the constant fear of extermination. Robespierre was a man who was determined to enforce his ideas at all costs. ...read more.

Middle

Thus, one can easily see that the Republic consisted of the extermination of all that opposed it. Foreign wars with countries that opposed the Republic through the use of the Committee of Public Safety and conscription further proved that the Republic consisted of only the extermination of everything that opposed it. When Louis XVI was executed on accounts of treason, England, Holland and Spain declared war on France, creating a foreign war issue (Haskins, 1971, 75). The Girondins were not able to achieve victories in these foreign wars, giving the Jacobins an excuse to take over. The Jacobins were determined to spread their political ideas out to all other European nations and exterminate all foreign countries who opposed these ideas. To carry out this task, Robespierre prompted the Committee of Public Safety to introduce conscription (Maximilien Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety, http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/robespierre.html, November 17, 2002). The massive army of conscripts that France now had was the reason for France's victories in foreign wars, and the only intent of the Republic to institute conscription was so that all opposing foreign countries would be exterminated. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, the Republic did interfere with the governments of other nations and did not remain friends and natural allies of these nations. Despite its actions, the intent of the Republic definitely disagreed with Saint-Just's quotation, as can be seen from the Constitution of 1793, therefore, the Republic did not consist of only the extermination of all that opposed it, but also of democratic ideas and thoughts of peace and equality. The Republic consisted of the extermination of everything that opposed it only to a certain extent, as it did have other objectives. This can be proven with many examples, however, the three above arguments agreeing and disagreeing with Saint-Just's comment are the most influential. Public revolt and foreign wars are two arguments that can justify Saint-Just's quotation very well, however, one must realize that the Republic also consisted of the Constitution of 1793. Taking all of this into account, Saint-Just's statement is not a completely accurate account of the Republic as it is true only to a certain extent, however, it does describe the violent actions taken by the Republic at that time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Corruption is the grease that lubricates the squeaky gate

    For example if a government department is overcrowded and underfunded then the capability to serve the people and function is reduced. So when a large company need planning permission for example, their application will not be processed for many months.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    This mastery, in turn, requires an acute and refined capacity to read the environment and learn from it (Rose 1993: 77-117). Myths about the man at the top actually being in control are almost useless. Ideas that derive from overly simplified principal-agent models are even worse.

  1. "The US Constitution is entrenched and rigid; the UK has no Constitution worthy of ...

    These cases dealt with issues on civil rights, abortion and capital punishment. So the judges' decisions can affect the Constitution and therefore the whole population greatly. This lead Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes to state 'we are under a

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    step down is democracy, which at least provides for a limitation on this level freedom that could possibly restrict the freedom of others, if the majority are rational and insist that the actions of those who would limit freedom be restrained themselves.

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    They were impoverished, either tilling the land of the aristocrats and paying them a sixth of the produce (sharecroppers) or farming their own land. Those who farmed their own land were the worst off. They owned very little as the few aristocrats owned most of the fertile land of the plains.

  2. "Why does philosophy play such a large part in the conversation about justice in ...

    Only those with knowledge of the world of forms and of how to implement its values in the institutions and men of this world would be able to effect such a transformation." What implications does this have for Plato's discussion of justice in the Republic?

  1. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    What the Dreyfus Affair did, Johnson says, is give the right a new sense of direction and coherence, it gave them something to rally around. The actions of the Dreyfusards and the issues which they raised polarised the objectives of the right and gave them a new ideology based in Nationalism4.

  2. To what extent are maps simply the embodiment of information and technique?

    However, there is a large use of maps in propaganda with a view to conscious and deliberate deception in the service of special interests (Wright, 1942). For example, propaganda maps created by the Nazis during the second world war serve to show the 'weak' position of Germany in relation to the rest of Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work