• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain in the Second World War: The Evacuation of British Children.

Extracts from this document...


GCSE History Coursework Britain in the Second World War: The Evacuation of British Children. Question 1. The British Government decided to evacuate children from all the major cities and move them to the country where they were less likely to get bombed. Major amounts of people got moved. 827,000 school children. 524,000 mothers and young children. 13,000 pregnant women. 103,000 teachers. 7000 blind and disabled people. (Letts History guide page 74.) If you take away this many people from a country then you take away this many people your taking away a lot of the population. Children are around a third of the country and if you remove them from the cities then you take away the stress on the emergency forces like the Police and ambulances. ...read more.


It would also allow them to think only about the fighting and make them better soldiers. This would also be the same for the children's mothers, who were playing a vital role for the government making munitions and keeping the countries war effort alive. If there children got sick they would have to take days off work to look after them, and during the day they would be constantly worried about them and would not make as many weapons and so forth. If they knew that there children would be safe away from the cities and having fun in the country then they would be generally happy, safe and healthy then they would work better, quicker and like the government more. ...read more.


It was good propaganda. If the Government moved all the children away from the major cities then they knew they would look good for them. It would appear that they are doing something for all of there people who were helping their war effort. So if they showed that they were caring and looked after the innocent victims of the war, and that they cared for the innocents then they would look generally better in the eyes of the people. Another reason why the government evacuated the children from major cities was because they were the British of the future. The next generation of Britain would need all of these children, instead of thousands of innocent children dieing needlessly in bombing raids, they would live to grow up to be the next scientists and doctors and people who are needed in a post war Britain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Foundations to Caring

    Exercise for children must be provided for either structured or free play indoor/ out door. The classroom facilitates for different types of play these are messy play, pretend play, construction, jigsaws, threading and small world, reading books and the home corner.

  2. Britain in the second World War: the Evacuation of British Children

    They may worry that their temporary "parents" did not treat them well or feed the well etc.

  1. The evacuation of British Children - Which source is the more useful as evidence ...

    The source is useful as it shows us, that children had to grow up very quickly. They also had to be very indepentant as many children where split from there brothers and sisters. The source also gives details on what the conditions where like.

  2. What Were The Differing Reactions In Britain To The Policy Of Evacuating Children During ...

    So many parents began to plead for them children to be brought back to them. Overall the parents of the evacuees were very grateful that their children could be in a safe area throughout the war so they would survive and not have to suffer the affects that the war would bring.

  1. Child Soldiers.

    But the pictures in books are not the only kind of violence these children witness. These children are thoroughly regimented within the harshest possible standards, as juvenile mercenaries are trained to the standards that adults are trained at. Despite intense preparation for battle, their lives are still in jeopardy, as

  2. Second world war evacuation.

    Their children have just been taken away from them, which is bad enough in itself, but under such circumstances can only be traumatic. As the teacher says, the mothers weren't allowed to go with them and they 'pressed against the iron gates calling 'good bye darling.''

  1. The idea for my coursework is the potential changing aspirations of teenage girls in ...

    I would want to have a child some time, but not for a long time"' " Actual marriage, I don't think it's necessary unless you're going to have children and I cant visualise myself having children."' Sue Lee's found very varied opinions on having children but on the whole most

  2. Why did the British government try to evacuate children from Britain's major cities in ...

    Source C is an extract from Carries War, a novel for children written by Nina Bowden in 1973. The fact that this book is a novel allows the author to use their poetic licence in order to make the book more interesting by use of exaggeration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work