• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast two Theories of the Maintenance and Breakdown of Romantic Relationships

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast two theories of the maintenance and breakdown of romantic relationships, including research studies. (25 marks) One theory of the maintenance and breakdown of relationships is Social Exchange Theory. This theory, proposed by Homans (1974), says that we view our interactions with others in terms of rewards and costs. Reward minus cost gives us 'profit'. Thus, those relationships in which the profits are great will give us the most satisfaction. Blau (1964) argues that interactions are expensive in terms of our time, commitment and energy and thus what we gain from one must exceed what we put into it. Berscheid and Walster state that our degree of attraction to a partner depends on the rewards we receive from being with that person compared with the costs of commiting oneself to that person. This theory is highly simplistic and one could argue scientifically indefensible, as it is difficult to objectively describe rewards and costs. As such, there are not really any case studies that prove the validity of the theory, apart from perhaps specific rewards, e.g., monetary awards, as these can be quantified, and those rewards described in Reward Theory. ...read more.


But, the idea of physical attractiveness affecting compatability has been measured in the context of initial attraction. Berscheid and Walster found that the enjoyment of a partner's company in a dance directly correlated with the physical attractiveness of the partner (measured by an objective bystander who scored their attractiveness). Therefore, we could assume that physical attractiveness is a very real reward, and that it would help maintain the quality of the relationship. If one partner became progressively unfit or unattractive, faster than the second partner, then the second partner should become dissatisfied. This could lead to the breakdown of the relationship, if the second partner felt that the comparison level alternative (Thibaut and Kelley) would satisfy them better. Similarity is rewarding, according to Rubin (1973), because: agreement is likely to provide the opportunity for partners to engage in joint activity; we assume those with similar views to ourselves will like us, so like them in return; communication is easier if we agree on things that matter to us; if our partner agrees with us, this boosts our self ...read more.


I.e. if both people put effort into the relationship, the rewards are greater than the sum of the effort of both. This tends to happen, so seems legitimate. Another similarity between the two theories is that they are both concerned with people's cognitions - i.e. what people think about the quality of the relationship and with people's emotions - i.e. whether they are satisfied emotionally in the relationship. It would be possible for theories to have a sociobiological slant or some kind of neurological slant, but these definitely do not. Another similarity is that they view people as fundamentally selfish, and are both theoretically limited in this sense. For example, neither take into account whether people might stay together for any ethical reason like for the sake of a child. They assume that people only think about themselves, and it is almost as if the two people are not in love at all. If they were in love, you would think that they would want to help their partner, rather than only doing so in expectation of a reward. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline one theory of the maintenance of relationships. The social exchange theory (Thibaut and ...

    3 star(s)

    Many of the studies associated with the social exchange theories have been characterized by other contrived methodologies, which lack in ecological validity. Ragsdale and Brandau-Brown (2007) reject the claim that equity is the key factor of relationship satisfaction. They believe that this claim does not reflect the ways that partners, in a long-term relationship behave with respect to each other.

  2. Persuasion Theory.

    The peripheral route occurs when the receiver lacks ability and/or motivation to engage in much thought on the issue. Using the peripheral route, the listener decides whether to agree with the message based on other cues besides the strength

  1. Outline two theories of relationship breakdown

    The third reason for the breakdown of relationships according to Duck is maintenance difficulties. Long distance relationships or those were the partners are unable to see each other enough often puts a strain of the relationship and can lead to its breakdown.

  2. Outline and evaluate theories on the maintenance of romantic relationships (24 Marks)

    This was not reversed when the woman earned more. This tendency for women to seek less for themselves in a relationship makes equity difficult to judge. However, Clark & Mills disagreed with this idea that all relationships are based on economics as they felt that exchange relationships like between colleagues are very different to romantic relationships.

  1. AQA A2 Psychology Unit 3 Relationships: The Formation, Maintenance And Breakdown of Romantic Relationships ...

    * There were four conditions: - Condition 1: The person was entirely positive on all occasions. - Condition 2: The person was entirely negative on all occasions. - Condition 3: The person went from negative at first to positive. - Condition 4: The person went from positive at first to negative.

  2. Discuss research into the breakdown of romantic relationships (24 marks)

    This causes the ?loser? to feel dissatisfied and the ?winner? to feel guilty. The both partners will feel motivated to restore the dynamics of the relationship once ?inequity? is experienced. However, if this continues then it is inevitable that the relationship will eventually breakdown.

  1. Outline and evaluate two theories of the maintenance of relationships.

    Thibaut and Kelley proposed that we develop a comparison level ? a standard against which all our relationships are judged. Our comparison level is a product of our experiences in other relationships together with our general views of what we might expect from this particular exchange.

  2. Theories on the maintenance and breakdown of relationships

    Also the assumption that people are selfish and self-centred may possess some validity in individualistic cultures because in individualistic cultures, people tend to only think about themselves or do things that only benefit them, so it does make sense that they may expect to receive more rewards in their relationship, but aim to minimise their costs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work