• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conformity in psychology.

Extracts from this document...


Leighton Camara-Roberts Pluto 12 Psychology Assignment 1 CONFORMITY Psychologists have long been interested in the area of social psychology that shows the extent of human conformity, proving that we are not designed as solitary creatures but our very own characters are determined by our social influences. Sherif headed a study into conformity, using the auto-kinetic effect, (which by means of small movements in our eyes causes a beam of light in a dark room appear to move). He asked participants to estimate how far and in what direction the light moved, therefore creating their own personal norm, because they are relying on their own judgement. Each person's norm was very different to the next person. Sherif then placed three different participants with very different personal norms into a group, and after discussing and sharing their opinions, it was found that they become very similar in their opinion because their personal norm was replaced by a group norm, which is a strong indication of social influence. Interestingly, it was found that in general their group norm roughly averaged out at the mean of the personal norms. Furthering his study, Sherif found that commencing the experiment with groups of 3 and then asking the participants for their own estimate showed evidence of group conformity. ...read more.


Amongst the findings, we saw that college students agreed with silly statements which given a different circumstance would have answered very differently. The two studies we have looked at show two different types of influence, informational and normative. Deutsch and Gerard defined the two in this way: Informational social influence: conformity due to the apparent superior knowledge and judgement of others, shown by Sherif's study. People change their opinion because of a number of different reasons including status and roles and familiarity. Informational influence leads usually to internalisation, where what a person believes actually changes. Normative social influence: conformity due to the want to be liked and accepted by others, as shown by Asch's experiment. Normative does not change private opinion; it affects public opinion because of compliance, where people, even though they don't believe in it, comply for the above reason of wanting to be accepted. Zimbardo studied social roles and the idea of identification or group membership. He investigated whether people conform to their expected roles in society 9 or their 'uniform'. Zimbardo found some emotionally stable participants to act as prisoners and guards for his mock prison, to see whether the hostility found in prisons at that time would be found in his prison. ...read more.


An explanation for both minority and majority influence may be social impact theory. This theory states that an individual's behaviour can be predicted in terms of three factors: strength, status and knowledge and immediacy. Strength means the amount of people who are present, which can have an effect on the rate of conformity and also the consistency of the message. People are more influenced if you are of a high status; you need few people of great status to make an impact compared to the amount of low status individuals. Also if you are a professional then you have more of an impact that an amateur. The closer the source of influence is to you and you're heart the more likely you are to believe them, and also physically, if you see the person influencing you, you are more likely to conform. How do you reduce conformity behaviour? Asch found two ways of reducing it. Firstly, by introducing a dissenter into the group. This reduced levels of conformity to only 5%. Secondly, by reducing the number of people with a different answer to you. It is easier not to conform in a small group than it is to a large one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    out show that overall males have the tendency to conform more in the questions than females. However this is only a slight difference (2%). Conformed in Not conformed in Descriptive statistics By referring to the summary table you can see that by looking at the various averages shown i.e.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Preventing and Reducing Crime

    3 star(s)

    (Blackburn, R.) So crime is learned and this social theory develops the idea that upon observing others who commit crime, the observer will do one of two things: 1: Copying- Because of the expectations of the rewards for doing so.

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    After they had looked at the pasta for 6 seconds, they then wrote their guess down on the next line (line 13), therefore meaning every participant was number 13. When collected, the debriefing was then started. The control and experimental group both had a different debriefing. (Appendix 4i and 4ii).

  2. Compare and contrast the studies of Sherif and Asch. What do they tell us ...

    In the experiment some of the participants acted as stooges. The stooges were told that they were going to do the tasks again, but this time in a group. There would also be one na�ve participant. On certain critical trials, Asch would indicate by means of secret signals the wrong answer to the stooges.

  1. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    The concept of Diffusion of responsibility may not have been ecologically valid. The subjects were asked to give money to award money to other subjects. The general findings were that the subjects chose reward conditions which maximized the difference between the amount of money rewarded to members of their ingroup and members of the outgroup.

  2. conjugal roles

    From this graph you can see the range of ages I have involved in my study. Around 50% of the samples I took were from the teachers in my college, which would explain the low frequency of samples taken from the ages 50-60.

  1. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    However, it is not a satisfactory explanation for conformity. The weakness in the theory is that the link between a need to evaluate oneself and a tendency to change oneself is not clear. Why should a negative self-evaluation lead someone to change and conform?

  2. The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

    carried out at Stanford University. Zimbardo recruited male participants through a newspaper advertisement asking for student volunteers to participate in a two-week prison experiment. The aim of the experiment was to see the psychological effects of making an average person into a prisoner or guard.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work