• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conformity in society

Extracts from this document...


Conformity It is common that some people act the way they feel they're supposed to, even though it might be opposite from what they really think. Usually, people tend to conform to groups, that is, to do the same thing that everyone else in the group does, regardless of whether they think it's right. This effect is one of the questions that social psychology is dealing with. One of the most important studies on conformity was conducted by Asch in 1952. His goal was to investigate levels of conformity when people were faced with a question that had an obvious answer. As his apparatus, Asch used cards with various lines. ...read more.


The results of Asch studies showed that on 32% of trials the participants have conformed to the group by giving the same wrong answer. Even 74% of all the na�ve participants have conformed at least once. 26% of participants never conformed, which is quite a low figure, considering that the answer was obvious. During debriefing, the participants reported several conditions which caused compliance. First, and the most obvious one, was simply because they didn't want to be the odd one out, which we refer to as distortion of action. Distortion of judgement follows, that is participant's oppinion that their perception must be inaccurate, and finally, distortion of perception, where the participants actually saw the wrong line as being right, unaware that this was influenced by the majority. ...read more.


were found with a majority of 3. Further increases in the size of the majority did not have an effect on conformity. However, when the majority was reduced to 2 people, compliance dropped to 12.2%. When only one confederate was used, there was absolutely no compliance. As the task difficulty rose or the clarity was reduced, conformity levels were found to be higher. Overall, this study is important because it shows us how people conform to majority. Although Asch may be criticised as lacking environmental validity, because of so obvious answers, these answers were deliberately made extremely obvious, so that no other factor like uncertainty about the answer would affect conformity. It was later shown that ambiguous answers only led to higher conformity levels. In real life, too, people conform to the majority very often, especially when they're not sure how to act. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    Implications of the study The results of the experimenters' questionnaires show that people are willing to conform on something they don't know about rather than just use an intelligent guess. Between males and females there isn't much difference in conformity levels, even though the results show that males do conform

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    The restored group felt some resentment towards their siblings who had never been given up. The adopted group having been in a situation where they had no family felt good to have brothers and sisters, (finally a family). Hans final fantasy about being married to his mother supported Freud's Oedipus complex.

  1. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    For the experimental sheets all the confederates answered incorrectly in a homogeneous fashion. The participants were asked to answer which line in Box B was closest to the line in Box A. The resulting answers by the participant for each sheet was recorded on the raw data sheet.

  2. The relationship between group size and conformity

    lower odds even if previously as individuals all had estimated the risk as higher! (Kogan and Wallach, 1964) Introduction Conformity is defined by David Myers as a change in behaviour or belief as a result of real or imagined group pressure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work