• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Critically evaluate Kelley's ANOVA model of attribution".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Critically evaluate Kelley's ANOVA model of attribution". Attribution theories involve the use of social and psychological research to explain how we interpret the events and behaviours we see around us. When observing behaviour, our own or other peoples, we attempt to provide explanations for its occurrence, these explanations are usually situational or dispositional. Thus, attributions are personal expressions about causal factors of events or behaviours. Theories have offered important insights into the ways in which people explain their own actions and the actions of others. Many theoretical models have been suggested; they usually involve a search for the cause of the behaviour, and an attempt to determine whether this is internal or external, followed by a decision as to whether the behaviour is logical or rational. Some of the most prominent theories are initially Heider's (1948) Model, which highlighted the fact that all behaviours have both internal and external causes. There is also Jones and Davis' (1965) Correspondent Inference Theory that is concerned with how we move from observing behaviour, to understanding the intention of the actor, to concluding the disposition which caused the intention. There is also Kelley's (1967) ANOVA model, which is concerned with what information we use to arrive at a causal attribution. ...read more.

Middle

Who then pose alternative explanations of how everyday attributions are made, Kelley's ANOVA model fails to provide adequate explanations in all of these areas. Initially Kelley failed to consider what is called the fundamental attribution error (Ross et al, 1977). This context refers to the tendency to underestimate situational factors and overestimate dispositional factors in making attributions. Ross et al (1977) carried out a study including quiz masters and contestants, they found that even though the quiz masters were in a position where they could ask any questions they wanted, people thought automatically that the quiz masters were more knowledgeable. This fundamental attribution error may also serve to explain why we tend to blame road accidents on the driver not the conditions. However even the concept of fundamental attribution errors is not completely ubiquitous as it has been proven by Miller (1984) that cultural differences are evident, with individualistic societies, such as Americans, paying more attention to dispositional factors and collectivist cultures, such as Indians emphasising situational factors. Linguistic differences in the West also play a role in this; the English language contains more terms that describe a person's dispositions than we do to describe different situations. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kelley's model is ultimately flawed, although it is possibly a good account of how people should use information, it is not through enough to explain what happens in everyday life. However it deserves credit for being one of the most through and useful models devised at the time. It has also stimulated further research into the topic and models devised later by other psychologists have helped to make the theory more workable. For example, Forsterling's (1992) formulation of Kelley's ANOVA model was based on the statistical anova parameter of effect size, and thus accounted for discounting augmentation as well as covariation. The results from our laboratory class and other pieces of research that have been in support of the ANOVA model cannot be ignored. However, with so much evidence to suggest that the MODEL is not an effective working model, one has to question whether supportive research evidence may have been flawed. As even with the introduction of Kelley's causal schemas the theory is still unworkable. Overall the theory seems to complex and rigid to be part of everyday attributions, however in an ideal world it may be helpful to use Kelley's ANOVA model to make unbiased, correct and thought through assumptions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Psychology - The Self Concept

    This allows us to learn who we are and how we interact with others. We discover our self-meaning or identity. The identities we have will emerge in each role-play and tends to express our beliefs in relation to social categories such as class, race, gender and age.

  2. young peoples' rights - sociology

    Environment It is a child's RIGHT to live in a safe, healthy, unpolluted environment. Children have the right to safe, nutritious food and water. (Article 24 of the UN Convention) 6. Protection the Government MUST protect children from: * Doing work which could be dangerous or which could harm their health.

  1. Samuel and Bryant (conservation)Bandura, Ross and Ross (aggression)Hraba and Grant (doll choice) a. What ...

    This implies that the child was only questioned once about the object after it underwent the transformation. * Fixed array control ~ This condition involved withholding the child from seeing the transformation taking place. Therefore, the child only saw the post-transformation display (the child only viewed the objects subsequent to

  2. What causes crime?

    Evaluation of Genetic Research Evidence does suggest that genetics do contribute to criminality. It is also certain that some heritable behavioural traits contribute to the types of crime that people commit. Twin studies have produced some supportive results and family studies suggest that criminality does run in families.

  1. Is Popular culture an Influence on Violent Behaviour?

    iconic figure such as Eminem can possess, blaming the artists fully for the reactions of people who listen to their music.

  2. It can be Argued that Attribution Theory does no more than Suggest that Individuals ...

    While the covariation model, may accurately characterise how we use consistency, distinctiveness and consensus information, it fails to include other information that people may take into account when making attributions (Pennington et al. 1999). Kelley's analysis of variance model sees the perceiver as a fairly rational person.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work