• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate one or more theories relating to the formation and/or maintenance of relationships

Extracts from this document...


Psychology Assignment 1 Describe and evaluate one or more theories relating to the formation and/or maintenance of relationships. The scientific study of how relationships form has shown that, at least in the initial stages, this process may have little to do with deep feelings and shard emotions, and more to do with self-interest. There are two main theories of relationship formation: The Reinforcement Affect Model and The Social Exchange Theory. The Reinforcement Affect Model The Reinforcement Affect Model was suggested by Byrne and Clore (1970). It proposes that we enter into a relationship because the individual concerned creates positive feelings in us, which makes them more attractive to us. The 'reinforcement' aspect of this model concerns operant conditioning; we like some individuals because they provide us with direct reinforcement (I.e. ...read more.


Furthermore, this model does not account for any cultural or gender differences there might be. Lott (1994) suggests that, in many cultures, woman focus more on the needs of others than on receiving reinforcement. Finally, a limitation is that The Reinforcement Affect Model is probably only relevant to certain kinds of relationship as, for example, family relationships are rarely based on rewards. The Social Exchange Theory The Social Exchange Theory, suggested by Thiabault and Kelley (1959) puts forward that the formation of a relationships is a two-way process, involving an interaction between two partners, each with their own needs and expectations. Thiabault and Kelley believed there were four stages in the development of a relationship; Sampling: in which people consider the potential costs and rewards of a new relationship and compare it with other relationships available at that time. ...read more.


Our comparison levels are products of experience in other relationships together with what I might expect from this one. This is supported by Simpson et al (1990) who found that participants who were involved in a relationship gave lower attractiveness ratings of possible opposite sex alternatives (presumably to protect their own relationships). Overall, the Social Exchange Theory has many strengths. For example, this theory is relevant to many different kinds of relationship, unlike the Reinforcement Affect Model. It can also explain individual differences between and within individuals, again unlike the Reinforcement Affect Model. Yet, in contrast, this theory has many limitations. One limitation is that this theory ignores the social aspects of a relationship. This theory also ignores 'fairness of exchange' rather than simply seeking a profit. Finally, the main criticism, however, focuses on the selfish nature of the theory: are people motivated to maintain relationships only out of hedonistic concerns? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay debates relevant points about formation and maintenance of relationships. Remember to consider ethical aspects and applications of theories and research. What about the evolutionary explanation? 4*

Marked by teacher Stephanie Duckworth 03/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate whether Milgrams research on obedience was ethical

    4 star(s)

    join his staff; therefore, this seems to strengthen Milgram's viewpoint that no long-term harm was caused by his experiment (americanscientist.org)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The effect of the Level of Processing on the amount of information recalled

    4 star(s)

    Participants were of mixed ability and both male and female and aged between 15 and 16 years old. Participants were chosen by opportunity sampling, as this is quick, convenient and easy. Participants chosen were available at the time, and it did not disrupt their lessons.

  1. "Anti-Social Behaviour is caused by a person's family background"

    Also as I will be addressing sensitive area such as their family background, I have been sure to word the questions so I do not offend anyone, this was done through my pilot questionnaire and previous research of the structuring of questionnaires.

  2. How might prejudice develop and how might it be reduced?

    The four types of characteristics that the test was designed to measure were: Ethnocentrism (looking at ones own racial group in a better light than another), totalitarianism (the view that all people should abide by the rules which they are set, and the intolerance of those who do not conform), anti-Semitism (anti-Jewish prejudice), and political conservatism.

  1. How well does the classic theory of deindividuation explain the behaviour of people in ...

    This can be seen with the identifiable groups being the least aggressive. This may be due to the other members identifying them as aggressive, which is a negative consequence. This raises the question what normative behaviour is, as this must be defined before behaviour can be called antinormative for deviating from, this.

  2. Psychological Theories Of Crime

    This can lead to this person to commit crime as they will be listening to the ID part of their personality. If a person has an overdeveloped ID, they will only act to please themselves. They will act to satisfy the needs of the ID.

  1. A) Describe the contribution of a biological perspective to our ...

    However traumatic events are also known to affect the nervous system and can cause these biological differences. In some cases it may be to do with inheritance/biology, but it can also be to do with people being exposed to certain levels of stress, traumatic events and differing life experiences.

  2. Outline and Evaluate Psychological Research into Minority Social Influence

    This strongly suggests that consistency is not the cause of minority social influence as said in 1969, however regular inconsistency will have more of an effect. This shows that although the original experiment wasn't inaccurate in its assumptions, further research has been able to better determine the way in which minority social influence works.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work