Describe and evaluate two theories of Altruism.

Authors Avatar

Describe and evaluate two theories of Altruism.

Firstly altruism is a form of pro social behaviour in which a person will voluntarily help another at some cost to himself or herself.  The primary motivation for altruistic behaviour is seen as a desire to improve the welfare of another person rather than the anticipation of some reward or for any other reason that might indicate self interest (Cardwell 1996).  There has been a debate between psychologists about what is truly altruistic and what might better be explained in terms of egoism.  

There was a hypothesis made a psychologist called Batson (1991).  It was called Batsons empathy – altruistic hypothesis.  This hypothesis explains altruistic behaviour as a consequence of empathy.  Empathy involves feeling an emotional response that is consistent with another’s emotional state or condition.  Batson also added to this hypothesis that this empathy will also result in feelings of sorrow, concern or compassion for the other person. Witnessing another person in distress therefore creates empathic concern (e.g. sympathy) and helpers would then be motivated to help alleviate the other person’s distress.  Empathy consists of a number of different components including prospective talking, personal distress and empathic concern.  It is perspective talking, that leads to empathic concern.

Join now!

This view of altruistic behaviour is particularly important because

‘Not only does it contradict the common assumption is psychology that all motivation is ultimately directed toward the egoistic goal of increasing our own welfare, it also contradicts the underlying assumption that human nature is fundamentally self serving’.  (Batson and Oleson 1991).

In some studies, Batson and his colleagues showed that people help for reasons other than the reduction of their own personal distress.

It is possible that people help simply to avoid feeling bad about themselves.  In a study to test for this personality, Batson et al (1998) contrived ...

This is a preview of the whole essay