• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Research Into Media Effects of Anti-Social Behaviour

Extracts from this document...


Discuss Research Into Media Effects of Anti-Social Behaviour There is evidence that promotes the view that anti-social behaviour can be promoted by the media. Some of the effects are short lived and others will vary depending on whether the anti-social behaviour is shown on its own or not. Violent video games and TV are the main sources of media violence. On TV there is very little aggression overall. The Gerbner Studies (1970's and 1980's) found that in children's TV programmes 20 violent acts per hour occurred. Since 1967, the percentage of violent programmes has not increased but the number of violent acts per programme has increased. Halloran and Croll (1972) found that violence was a common feature on TV programmes but not as prevalent on British as it was on American TV programmes. Cumberbatch (1987) supported this, finding that 30% of programmes had violence in them but only 1% of TV is violent overall. Gunter and Harrison (1995) said that violence only occupies a tiny proportion of TV in few programmes. They found that 1% of terrestrial TV was violent and less that, 2% on satellite TV was violent. Altogether there is not very much violence on TV but what there is seems to be concentrated to a few programmes which if young children are exposed to could be damaging to them mentally especially in later life. ...read more.


This is supported by Liebert and Baran (1972) who found that children watching an aggressive film demonstrated a greater willingness to hurt another child. Both of these laboratory studies show that if children are exposed to aggression in the media, although this was set up intentionally, they can become more aggressive. Both of these studies are laboratory studies and the problem with these is that it is difficult to generalise findings to real life situations. A comparison of two cities was made by Hennigan et al (1982); one city had TV the other didn't. The presence or absence of TV did not affect the crime rate and there was no increase in violent crime when the city without TV got TV. There was an increase in robberies due to people seeing affluence on TV and wanting to possess more. Williams (1986) supported this finding that aggression in children increased when TV was introduced. Centrewall 91989) compared South Africa, Canada and USA. In USA and Canada the murder rates increased after TV was introduced. In South Africa the number of murders declined but only in white people. Therefore these studies show that if there is no TV in a certain place then the introduction of TV can increase the crime rate in that place. ...read more.


Different people interpret violent acts in different ways and they can be portrayed in the media for different reasons. E.g. a man had his house broken into, caught the burglars in his house and he shot them, was this a justified act of violence? It was highly publicised because of this. Media violence in studies is restricted to fictional programmes news programmes are exempt. If violence in fictional programmes has such adverse effects on people then why don't they have the same effects on people when they are shown in the news? The evidence does show that the media does have an effect on violent behaviour but the difference is very small and as Cumberbatch said, the results should be treated cautiously. The media does also have pro-social effects as well as anti-social ones; if the catharsis theory is correct then it can relieve aggressive feelings and prevent aggression in real life. The media cannot be completely blamed for aggression; there are other factors to be considered that could influence the person particularly a child. Research portrays children as helpless victims of the media's influence but it has been shown that children can critically talk about the media at age seven. The child's upbringing, background, culture and peers could all influence any possible aggressive behaviour. The media alone cannot be blamed for all aggression; other factors have to be taken into account. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Is Popular culture an Influence on Violent Behaviour?

    Others believe that popular culture is a type of 'folk' culture which encompasses the idea of an 'alternative' culture incorporating minority groups, perhaps with subversive values sometimes challenging the dominant control groups, as was scene with the advent of the 'Indie' music scene in the mid nineteen nineties.

  2. What causes crime?

    However, there are several unreliable factors e.g. similarities in environment and early experiences through pregnancy and after birth. Sandberg's (1961) theory has suggested that an extra Y chromosome does carry a risk of behavioural problems, but can only account for predisposition in a small percentage of criminals.

  1. The effects of media on prosocial behaviour.

    One positive effect of television might be that witnessing others behaving aggressively helps viewers to get their aggressive feelings 'out of their systems' and hence be less likely to behave aggressively. This claims that television can act as a form of vicarious catharsis.

  2. “Young are trained to kill; violence in the media”. To what extent is it ...

    Watching television may lead to the development of attitudes that portray the world as a more dangerous place than it actually is because violence is more salient and frequent on television than it is in most real life experiences. In fact, it seems that paradoxically television may both desensitize individuals to violence and sensitize them to it.

  1. Psychology Cae Studies

    Remember that it said slight shock to danger severe shock. Remember that the subjects were deceived as to the true nature of the experiment-they thought the experiment was looking at the relationship between memory and learning. The subjects in the true experiment were involved in a rigged selection process for the fake experiment.

  2. Television Violence and Children's Behaviour

    This suggests that seeing a model punished leads to less learning of the model's behaviour. However, after all the children had played in the playroom with the doll, they were offered rewards to behave in the playroom like the adult model had done.

  1. Discuss studies into the influence of the media on antisocial behaviour including an evaluation ...

    Also there is tight control over extraneous variables. However, the fact that it was a laboratory experiment means that it has low ecological validity. Although it can easily be repeated it was not in a natural setting. The results achieved may also be due to demand characteristics and the ethics of the study are also in question.


    In addition the results did show that 2 children did display levels of violence after watching television but the programme in both instances was not completed on the questionnaire, for what reason I do not know. Furthermore the parents' questionnaire revealed that the average time children are watching television is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work