• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

''Evacuation was a great success'' - Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Assignement 1 2(b) 11/12/02 ''Evacuation was a great success'' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your own studies. The aims of evacuation by the British government in the Second World War were, to keep up morale by minimising infant casualties from air raids. They also wished to preserve future generations, as well as protect those most vulnerable such as the handicapped and pregnant women. The government also wanted to keep the children happy and un-scared by the horrors of war. Source A shows a crowd of children with their mothers walking to the station in London to be evacuated to the countryside. All of the children and mothers have smiley, cheerful faces and are waving to the camera, they seem excited and happy about the thought of evacuation. I know that excitement was a common feeling shared amongst many evacuees during the Second World War. However the children and their mothers may well have been playing up to the camera, in which case this source does not express their true feelings about the thought of being split up from each other and sent to a strange place. Source D also suggests that all evacuated children are very happy and healthy in the countryside 'And they're healthier and happier. Perhaps they don't say it but they certainly mean 'Thankyou''. ...read more.


Another source exploits this fact further still, as the Government was forced to provide better conditions, as people were so appalled at the state of the children that had been evacuated. 'Cod liver oil, blackcurrant extracts, and later concentrated orange juice from the united states was given out free of charge at food offices and welfare centres. However, many children had bad experiences of evacuation, and this would strongly suggest that evacuation was a failure. Source B is a description of evacuation from a teacher in 1988. It says how 'children were too afraid to talk' and how the mothers were pressed against the iron bars calling 'Good-bye darling'. This shows how scary evacuation was for so many children; as well as their mothers; many of them had no clue as to where they were going. As this is an interview with a teacher, it is likely to be an accurate and reliable, it also reflects the experiences of many evacuees. Source C is an account from children's novel; it outlines the problems of communication between foster parents and their children evacuee's. ''Oh, I'm sorry, how silly of me, why should we have slippers?'' Many foster parents were surprised at how poor their children were and had to pay out for their requirements. Source E is from a Mass Observation Survey, it is an interview with a farther, he outlines the reasons why many parents think that there children will be better staying at home in the city. ...read more.


By 1944 the evacuation scheme had all but stopped, and not even the panic caused by Hitler's flying bombs and rockets could get it started. This is where the Government had failed to keep up the morale of the country and persuade people that evacuation was the best and safest option for their children and people no longer cared about the possible consequences. The evacuation process was efficient and with a quick response to war. With little notice, children were packed up with only one suitcase and sent to the railway station to catch a train that they did not know the destination of their journey. On arrival, they were lined up and picked out like slaves. Though many experienced a new life style, in the countryside learning new skills that they would never be taught in the city and they became more healthy and clean with their foster parents. Forced integration of people from very different backgrounds exposed the real divide present in the country. Evacuation was certainly the safest option for the children, and the majority experienced a happy new life, where they became healthier, however, no one was without their problems. Mothers, children and foster parents alike were not informed about what was involved in fostering children, in some cases the children were abused or made to labour on farms, in these cases the government had failed the children. Many however, were happy with evacuation but no one was un scared by the horrors of war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. I have decided to do my portfolio on Beaufort Park School, for several reasons. ...

    The LEA's power over schools has been reduced by a large proportion, due to the dual centralisation and devolution process. After the 1988 Act governors were given more responsibilities. As a consequence some governing bodies specifically try to attract governors with legal/personnel management/financial expertise, but this is not always possible.

  2. Evacuation was a great success." Do you Agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    It may be reliable because it's a primary source and there's nothing to hide............ These sources give some failures and success although more success.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation? Explain your answer ...

    a train before so this was a big deal for them, and it caused much reason for happiness among the children. In fact some of the children enjoyed it so much that after the war ended even if their parents were alive they stayed in their foster home.

  2. Why do sources A to E differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    This source may furthermore not be reliable because the photograph could have been staged, for instance it does not say who took the photograph. For example, it would probably have been the first time that the children, who are from the city and attend a local school, would have been

  1. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    Many children had a worse time being evacuated than they would have if they had stayed home. This source is fairly reliable as it comes from an evacuee, however it too, is from in interview in 1988 making it hard to be sure that the memories of the evacuee have not altered since the time of their evacuation.

  2. The evacuation of British Children - Which source is the more useful as evidence ...

    missed out as the context of them may have not been appropriate. It was also written for British schools, so I may be biased towards Britain. The book was also written a while after the war, so again things many have been forgotten or missed out.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The source is furthermore useful because it supplies us with a view of what evacuation may have been like and how the evacuation process was conducted, and it shows us the sort of scene there may have been when children were being evacuated.

  2. In response to growing tension and technological advances in war, the British government set ...

    By January 1940, the civil or military sectors of the war effort had put into use 1588 schools around the country. During this time the children had little or no education, with what little given them set up by teachers and parents remaining in the cities in a sort of tutoring workshop.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work