• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

evaluate the arguments for and against the introduction of legislation on smacking children

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the arguments for and against the introduction of legislation on smacking children By Louise Smith From the 27 October 2003 a new law was put in place with regards to children and physical punishment. The new law states that parents in England and Wales who smack children so hard it leaves a mark can and will be punished, this could lead to a prison sentence of up to five years in jail. Previously, the law allowed parents the right of 'reasonable chastisement' in disciplining their children. Parents were able to administer moderate physical punishment to their children without liable conviction for assault. But, the concept of 'reasonable chastisement' dates back to 1860 and is difficult to define in the 21st century. ...read more.


the position of this responsibility lies upon the parents and it is up to the child protection agencies to deal with the individuals when that line is crossed. Ministers see their opposition to a complete ban as a decision of common sense. A decision that balances the essential need for children to be protected with the right of parents to not have government interfering in family life. An example of this is the view of the labour party; "We do not want to criminalize parents". (Bainbridge 2007). This may seem like quite an ironic view considering the rebellion of 47 labour mps to back an outright ban. A rebellion defeated by 424 to 75 votes. ...read more.


What is in place at the moment means that children actually have less protection under the law of assault than adults do. This compromise causes more confusion as it removes the 'reasonable chastisement' defence for assault and battery of a child but retains it for actual bodily harm and the NSPCC criticize this compromise, saying it defines an acceptable threshold of violence towards children. To conclude, the general consensus of the government and public is that a balance between parents right to discipline and protecting children is what is to be ultimately achieved. Whereas the view of child protection agencies is that by relying on physical punishment, parents are teaching a child to be afraid and are potentially storing up a lot of problems for that child's future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Child Labour.

    While in the factory children inhale fumes and other toxic substances into their small body causing problems and sickness to the child. Analyse Cause-And-Effect Relationships that Affect the People and the Environment Globally The effect of colonialism affect people globally around the world.

  2. What causes crime?

    in his Glasgow study identified overcrowding as more important than actual numbers in the family. * Working Mothers: There is no direct evidence to link delinquency with the children of working mothers, to any greater degree than with those of non-working mothers.

  1. Should smacking children be against the law?

    Another argument is that in the last couple of decades we have outlawed physical punishment in schools. And what have we seen? More civility, less bullying? No, we've seen exactly the opposite. And now an increasing number of teachers are leaving the profession because of the total lack of discipline, and even teachers being assaulted.

  2. Should Smacking Be Banned In Britain?

    Children who took part in this report emphasised the extreme fear they experienced at the thought of being smacked again. Consequently, children see their parents as vicious bullies who they can not defend themselves against since parents can hit back far harder.

  1. A brief introduction of the internet

    Gulf War, where updates from around the world came across the wire, and most IRC users who were online at the time get to hear these reports). IRC also promote active involvement. If you are a student, IRC provides an opportunity for you to practice your English especially when you are interacting with a native speaker of English.

  2. 'Hitting Children Is Wrong.' Evaluate this statement in the form of an advisory paper ...

    There are several arguments, which suggest that hitting children is wrong and evidence to support these arguments. Firstly hitting can cause serious physical harm to a child even accidentally. An adult is physically bigger and stronger than a child and therefore the likelihood of causing the child harm by physical punishment is great.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work