• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate two explanations relating to the breakdown of relationships

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate two explanations relating to the breakdown of relationships Duck's model of relationship breakdown describes the breakdown of romantic relationships in a series of phases. The first phase is the intrapsychic phase, which involves the realisation of negative aspects about one's partner. If the negative aspects are not resolved, the couple will enter the dyadic phase, in which the problems that one partner is experiencing are brought to the attention of the other partner, with resolution attempts following. If such resolution attempts fail, the couple will enter the social phase, in which the relationship is doomed to end, and partners think of face-saving accounts of why the relationship will end. Finally, the partners enter the grave-dressing phase, in which the relationship has ended, and both partners communicate a socially acceptable account of what happened. This model of relationship breakdown has been widely criticised for being unidirectional, implying that if the smallest of problems arises, a couple is doomed to separate. ...read more.

Middle

He divided the risk factors into 'predisposing risk factors' and 'precipitating risk factors'; predisposing risk factors come from a realisation about characteristics of a partner that may have not been realised in the first stages of the relationship, and precipitating risk factors are external and develop separately from the relationship (e.g. infidelity, illness and jealousy). This may therefore offer a good explanation of how and why relationships break down when combined with the stage models. However, the limitation exists that even with such factors taken into account, the models focus on Western, monogamous, male-female relationships, and may not be suitable in describing the breakdown of friendships or non-Western dyadic relationships. Economic exchange theories have offered alternative explanations of relationships which involve the balance of rewards or ratio of rewards to inputs in the relationship. Thibaut & Kelley proposed a 'social exchange theory', which is based on the assumption that a relationship will be successful if each partner receives as many rewards as possible (rewards including sex, attention, affection, etc), and will therefore be unsuccessful if these rewards are not present. ...read more.

Conclusion

If this ratio is imbalanced, the relationship becomes 'inequitable', and distress is caused as a result. Research evidence supports this theory as an improvement on social exchange theory, for example Hatfield et al. Found that newlyweds in equitable relationships were more satisfied than those who received more benefits than the effort that they put in, who in turn were more satisfied than those who were underbenefited. Gergen et al., however, suggest that the two theories may work best together to overcome cultural differences: in their study, they found that European students preferred equality in the distribution of rewards (social exchange theory), whereas American students preferred equity (equity theory). Nonetheless, much of the research which has given support to economic exchange theories has taken place in artificial situations and may not be representative of real life due to their lack of ecological validity and mundane realism. Economic exchange theories may also be an improvement on stage models of relationship breakdown as they can be applied to friendship and polygamous or polyamourous relationships, therefore having more cross-cultural validity. Clive Newstead ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A reasonably well structured essay using relevant theories and studies to debate the issues. Consider developing points about applications of the theories - for example how might relationship counsellors use these models to help couples restore their relationships? 3*

Marked by teacher Stephanie Duckworth 03/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate whether Milgrams research on obedience was ethical

    4 star(s)

    experienced, including their behaviour and actions during the experiment, which could have potentially caused long-term psychological damage (Hill G 2001). Milgram's defence to this was that a debriefing was given after the experiment and that the participants visited a psychiatrist one year after, who found no lasting damage on their mental health.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate biological explanations of aggression

    4 star(s)

    such situational factors that may cause a person to behave aggressively - this would be hard to test in mice as they are not on the same cognitive level as humans. So therefore we cannot extrapolate these findings to humans as the mice may behave differently to humans when they have higher levels of testosterone.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The effect of the Level of Processing on the amount of information recalled

    4 star(s)

    A criticism of the LOP model is that it is the time and effort that affect recall and not depth of processing. Depth and effort cannot be measured, but time of attention was kept the same. The experiment was carried out at the same time of day, and during the same lesson.

  2. Whistleblowing, The Problems and the Issue.

    However, even very few more successful whistleblowers may obtain some related compensation, such as a monetary pay-off as part of a court settlement. But has the organization changed at all? In some cases new policies are introduced, but in others the situation even get worse than before, since the harsh

  1. "Anti-Social Behaviour is caused by a person's family background"

    There also seems to be particularly high levels of anti social behaviour from males who live in single parent working class families, this can be related to studies discussed earlier. However research was not conducted as to the reasons for why a higher amount of anti social behaviour is committed by this proportion of the population.

  2. Outline and Evaluate Psychological Research into Minority Social Influence

    It was found that if the minority was to express an opinion whilst sat at the head of the table the influence was greater than if the minority chose to sit elsewhere. Although this does not contradict the 1969 experiment, it does suggest that consistency is not the only important factor in minority social influence.

  1. Critically Compare the Factors that Affect Interpersonal Attraction and the Development of Relationships

    Snyder, et al (1977 see Gross p.481) showed that when men thought that the woman they were talking with over the phone was physical attractive, they acted more warmly towards her and this in turn led her to act warmer, more confident and animated. Attractiveness is a potent variable at the beginning of a relationship however individuals tend to match on physical attractiveness.

  2. Psychological Theories Of Crime

    This can lead to this person to commit crime as they will be listening to the ID part of their personality. If a person has an overdeveloped ID, they will only act to please themselves. They will act to satisfy the needs of the ID.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work