• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate two explanations relating to the breakdown of relationships

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate two explanations relating to the breakdown of relationships Duck's model of relationship breakdown describes the breakdown of romantic relationships in a series of phases. The first phase is the intrapsychic phase, which involves the realisation of negative aspects about one's partner. If the negative aspects are not resolved, the couple will enter the dyadic phase, in which the problems that one partner is experiencing are brought to the attention of the other partner, with resolution attempts following. If such resolution attempts fail, the couple will enter the social phase, in which the relationship is doomed to end, and partners think of face-saving accounts of why the relationship will end. Finally, the partners enter the grave-dressing phase, in which the relationship has ended, and both partners communicate a socially acceptable account of what happened. This model of relationship breakdown has been widely criticised for being unidirectional, implying that if the smallest of problems arises, a couple is doomed to separate. ...read more.

Middle

He divided the risk factors into 'predisposing risk factors' and 'precipitating risk factors'; predisposing risk factors come from a realisation about characteristics of a partner that may have not been realised in the first stages of the relationship, and precipitating risk factors are external and develop separately from the relationship (e.g. infidelity, illness and jealousy). This may therefore offer a good explanation of how and why relationships break down when combined with the stage models. However, the limitation exists that even with such factors taken into account, the models focus on Western, monogamous, male-female relationships, and may not be suitable in describing the breakdown of friendships or non-Western dyadic relationships. Economic exchange theories have offered alternative explanations of relationships which involve the balance of rewards or ratio of rewards to inputs in the relationship. Thibaut & Kelley proposed a 'social exchange theory', which is based on the assumption that a relationship will be successful if each partner receives as many rewards as possible (rewards including sex, attention, affection, etc), and will therefore be unsuccessful if these rewards are not present. ...read more.

Conclusion

If this ratio is imbalanced, the relationship becomes 'inequitable', and distress is caused as a result. Research evidence supports this theory as an improvement on social exchange theory, for example Hatfield et al. Found that newlyweds in equitable relationships were more satisfied than those who received more benefits than the effort that they put in, who in turn were more satisfied than those who were underbenefited. Gergen et al., however, suggest that the two theories may work best together to overcome cultural differences: in their study, they found that European students preferred equality in the distribution of rewards (social exchange theory), whereas American students preferred equity (equity theory). Nonetheless, much of the research which has given support to economic exchange theories has taken place in artificial situations and may not be representative of real life due to their lack of ecological validity and mundane realism. Economic exchange theories may also be an improvement on stage models of relationship breakdown as they can be applied to friendship and polygamous or polyamourous relationships, therefore having more cross-cultural validity. Clive Newstead ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A reasonably well structured essay using relevant theories and studies to debate the issues. Consider developing points about applications of the theories - for example how might relationship counsellors use these models to help couples restore their relationships? 3*

Marked by teacher Stephanie Duckworth 03/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate biological explanations of aggression

    4 star(s)

    Harrison's study only used male participants and then generalised the results to the whole population - these is beta bias, as it is assuming that there are no real differences between men and women. Also men have higher levels of testosterone than women - so how does it affect women?

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast two theories of Bystander Behaviour

    4 star(s)

    Autokinetic Paradigm; a study in which Sherif used this optical illusion to determine participants' reactions when asked to say how far the light was moving. Results showed that 100% of participants changed their answers when put in groups with confederates.

  1. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching Hypothesis

    not be true in certain situations, and there are therefore other factors which determine whether two people will be attracted to eachother or not. Reasons why Murstein's and Silverman's findings are refuted by my results could be due to social norms shifts that have occurred within the last 30 + years, e.g.

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Noise Noise levels may also act as a stressor and may lead to arousal and frustration. The relationship between noise and aggression has been explained by noise alone not being seen as being sufficient in aggression, but in combination with pre-existing anger noise may act as a cue and trigger aggression.

  1. Formation of Relationships

    Physiological support for the theory can be provided through the research of Aron et al (2005), which showed that intense romantic love was associated with activity in the reward regions of the brain. This indicates that love or attraction is rewarding, and this would provide support for the idea that attraction acts as a positive stimulus.

  2. Outline and Evaluate Psychological Research into Minority Social Influence

    Nemeth and Brilmayer (1987) found that when a minority of one refused to change his opinion on a matter (not compromising over the amount of compensation to be paid in a mock jury case) the person had no effect over the majority.

  1. Outline and evaluate explanations of institutional aggression.

    This theory rationalises the behaviour. A strength of a theory that can be applied to the real-world is that it has application. It is true to real life. This also supports the biological approach which has many strengths such as being able to easily test and prove the theory.

  2. Outline and evaluate the effect of cultural influences on gender roles

    The influence of culture on gender roles and behaviours can be compared to the evolutionary perspective, in order to determine whether gender develops through our cultural environment or whether it?s universal. Evidence has shown that gender is culturally relative and thus behaviour, roles and division of labour varies widely between cultures.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work