• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate two or more social psychological theories of aggression.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Outline and evaluate two or more social psychological theories of aggression. Deindividuation theory is a social psychological explanation of aggression. It explains how rational individuals can become aggressive hooligans in a mob or crowd as it suggests that losing their sense of identity and self awareness deindividuates people. Individuals in groups fail to see the consequences of their actions, and the social norms they would normally follow are forgotten and this is when aggressive behaviour occurs. Deindividuation causes people unquestioningly to follow group norms instead of personal norms and sometimes these group norms lead to aggression. According to Zimbardo, in a crowd we feel anonymous and unaccountable and thus are less concerned about negative evaluations by others and less likely to be prevented from acting aggressively by guilt or shame. Prentice-Dunn identified two factors involved in Deindividuation; loss of public self-awareness where individuals lose a sense that others are aware of them and that they are identifiable. Loss of public self0awareness leads to a loss of public standards of behaviour or a lowering of inhibitions. Another factor is loss of private self-awareness where the individual loses their own sense of awareness of themselves. Loss of private self-awareness leads to a loss of internal standards and hence an over-reliance on environmental cues, for example others in the crowd. ...read more.


In fact, the prisoners were treated so brutally that the experiment had to be stopped after just six days. In the replication of Milgram?s study, ethical issues included deception, and lack of informed consent, as the participant was not told the true nature of the study and so had to be deceived. The participant?s right to withdraw was also an issue as it was made to seem that they had to continue shocking the learner. Ethical issues like these however, can be overcome with debriefing, which Zimbardo implemented. There is also a lack of support for the deindividuation theory as evidence appears to be mixed. A meta-analysis of 60 studies concluded that there is insufficient support for the major claims of this theory. For example Postmes and Spears found that disinihibition and antisocial behaviour are not more common in large groups and anonymous settings. Neither was there much evidence that deindividuation is associated with reduced self-awareness, or that self-awareness increases disinhibition of aggressive behaviour. Therefore we cannot be sure as to how valid this theory actually is. Also, although a lot of research into deindividuation has found associations between deindividuation and antisocial behaviour, some studies have shown that deindividuation may also increase the incidence of prosocial behaviour. When prosocial environmental cues were present, deindividuated participants performed significantly more selfless acts and significantly fewer antisocial acts compared to a control group. ...read more.


He found that children in the aggressive condition showed more verbal and physical aggression. Bandura concluded that the chances of aggressive acts being imitated increased if the aggressive model was reinforced but decreased if the model was punished. This supports social learning theory as it shows that imitation will only be seen if the behaviour is vicariously reinforced. Aggression was also more likely to be intimidated if a child identified with a model, for example boys were more aggressive if the model was male. However, there are several criticisms we can make with Bandura?s study. Methodological issues include the fact that Bobo dolls are not living people and does not retaliate when hit, and therefore lacks ecological validity. Therefore it is questionable as to how much the study tells us about the imitation of aggression towards other human beings. Also some people argue that there is high demand characteristics involved in this study as the situation was unfamiliar so the children may have been acting in the way they thought they were expected to. Social learning theory also ignores biological factors which may influence aggressive behaviour such as high levels of testosterone and ignores any evidence suggesting biological or genetic components influence human aggression and so the theory is reductionist. A strength of social learning theory however, is its ability to explain cultural differences in levels of aggression. Some cultures emphasize and model aggressive behaviour whereas others emphasise non-aggressive behaviour and produce individuals with low aggression levels ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Outline and evaluate two social psychological theories of aggression

    5 star(s)

    Factors that cause deindividuation include being in a large crowd, anonymity due to wearing a uniform and altered consciousness due to drugs or alcohol. Deindividuation leads to reduced inner restraints and therefore an increase in behaviours that are usually inhibited and also reduces the fear of negative evaluation from others.

  2. Outline and evaluate two social psychological theories of aggression. Two social psychological theories of ...

    Many studies have provided support for this theory in explaining aggression, for example a study by Bandura on nursery children who watched a video of aggressive behaviour on a bobo doll found that those who saw the adult rewarded for their aggressive behaviour were more aggressive than those who saw

  1. Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?

    Maybe if they had not been so shocking (excuse the pun!) people would not have given Milgram's work a second thought, perhaps the unpalatable findings made people seek to discredit the procedures. Milgram's work on obedience was attacked on ethical grounds, saying he deceived people and caused unreasonable distress.

  2. Outline and evaluate two social psychological theories of aggression

    Twin studies have provided evidence that genetic factors are important as well, for example, the study by McGue, Brown and Lykken. They found that identical twins had nearer the same level of aggression, whereas non-identical twins had different levels of aggression.

  1. Outline two social psychological theories of aggression.

    To satisfy the first part of the M'Naghten rules, "Defect of reason" it must be proved that the accused powers of reasoning are, or were at the time of the Act impaired. In Clarke it was shown that mere absent-mindedness does not amount to insanity.

  2. Two social psychological theories of aggression are the social learning theory and deindividuation. Both ...

    Deindividuated behaviour is based on primitive urges and does not confirm to social normsAn example of being deindividuated is in a big crowd at night time. Festinger suggested that there is a reduction in inner restraints or self awareness when individuals are in a group.

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Piliavin et al believed that physiological arousal is more likely to be labelled personal distress because the bystander is feeling aroused and this is interpreted as anxiety i.e. distress. When people are in a state of personal distress, they are motivated to do something about it, but first costs and benefits must be calculated.

  2. Discuss two or more social psychological theories of aggression

    However, not all evidence has shown anti-social consequences of deindividuation, which suggests that it doesn?t always lead to aggression. Spivey et al found that depending on situational factors, deindividuation could also lead to pro-social behaviour like religious gatherings. This suggests that there are external influences like arousal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work