• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall. Abstract. This report aimed to investigate the effects of distraction and chunking on short term memory performance. A serial recall task was used to investigate this in a sample of 20 male and female undergraduate student in a within subject design. This data was analysed with a two way repeated measures ANOVA and the results show that there are significant improvements in recall when the items are chucked. In addition there is a significant deterioration in recall following the distraction technique. However, there are no interaction effects between these factors. These findings are discussed in terms of potential means of improving short term memory. Introduction. It is generally accepted that there are three different memory systems; sensory memory, short term memory and long term memory. These distinctions were first defined by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1971). Sensory memory is that which holds information from the senses for up to several seconds at the most. Short-term memory in contrast, is whatever we are thinking about at any given moment and has a relatively rapid input and retrieval. Miller (1965) argued that human short term memory has a span of approximately seven items, plus or minus two. ...read more.

Middle

Specifically he lacked the ability to transfer new short term memories into long term ones. He could repeat information for many minutes, but if distracted, even briefly, he would forgot. HM is not an isolated case and thus the role of the temporal lobes is clearly essential in human memory. This study therefore aims to assess the effects of the chunking of items and the presence of a distracter technique prior to recall on short term memory.It is hypothesised that chunked items without a distraction will facilitate greater recall than chunked items followed by a distraction. In addition it is hypothesised that chunked items without distraction will result in greater recall than non chunked items with a distraction. Overall, chunked items will be more successful in terms of recall then non chunked items and the presence of the distracter will result in a deterioration in recall. The null hypothesis, therefore infers that there will be no difference in recall between the conditions. Methodology. Participants were 20 male and female undergraduate students, aged between 18-19 years who participated voluntarily. The sample is highly female biased (15 female and 5 males were recruited). ...read more.

Conclusion

helping them to remember things on a day-day basis and that they should bear in mind that distractions are likely to cause memory loss. Individuals should also bear in mind the evidence which suggests that only between five to nine items can usually be held in short term memory. This study would have benefited from a larger sample size and a greater proportion of male participants in order to examine the possibility that there are gender effects. In addition it would be interesting to look at a wider demographic by including individuals from a broader age range. It would be interesting to expand this study in order to investigate the possibility that the type of distracter technique in particular, exerts an influence over recall. For example would these effects be replicated if the participant were required to read the distracter themselves rather than listening to it? Or to speak it aloud themselves? Greater attention should also be paid to strength of the distracter technique required to create these effects. It is hoped that future research will tackle these issues in order to increase our knowledge in this field and to continue to offer help for patients suffering from memory deficits. Word Count: 2087 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Jennifer Sanders ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. The Effect Chunking of Numbers has on Short-Term Memory Recall.

    Participants of past studies also tend to be adults, so this study was conducted on students to explore a new age group. Aim The aim of this study is to investigate the effect chunking of numbers has on short-term memory recall.

  2. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    2 Mean - Last 5 1.1 1.9 Mean - Middle 10 1.7 1.9 Total Mean 4.3 5.8 Mode words recalled 5 7 Furthermore the graph shown in appendix E (Graph 1) shows how many words were recalled in total for each condition The Mann Whitney U test was carried out on the data.

  1. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    Slak (1970) found that subjects who found a number sequence such as 265070193 very difficult, by using a mnemonic, a word or group of words that can be associated with the information being remembered, like BAFDILTUN could learn the letter-code equivalent much quicker.

  2. How interference affects memory recall

    group that doesn't listen to music will write down all the words they remember straight away and the people who will be listening to music will listen to music for 1.30 minutes then they will have 1 minute to write down the words they can recall.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    carrying out an experiment, however some problems can occur by using this method such as demand characteristics where the participants can easily guess the aim which can have an effect on the results and therefore making the results bias, to overcome this problem each participants carried out the experiment individually

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    The beep sound was again used, to make the investigation fair for all the participants. They were given another 60 seconds to recall and record the information in the scoring sheet. After the time was due, they were told to "stop writing" and their scoring sheet was collected.

  1. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    Bower, 1972 conducted an imagery recall experiment. He asked participants in one condition to form mental images to link the random images on cards; the other condition was asked to just memorise the words. He found that participants who used imagery recalled 80% of the words compared with only 45% by the non-imagers.

  2. Stroop Effect

    This in turn means that the alternate hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected. This is because the observed value is smaller tan the critical value. Discussion The psychological research conducted by Stroop support the results of this experiment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work