Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall. Abstract. This report aimed to investigate the effects of distraction and chunking on short term memory performance. A serial recall task was used to investigate this in a sample of 20 male and female undergraduate student in a within subject design. This data was analysed with a two way repeated measures ANOVA and the results show that there are significant improvements in recall when the items are chucked. In addition there is a significant deterioration in recall following the distraction technique. However, there are no interaction effects between these factors. These findings are discussed in terms of potential means of improving short term memory. Introduction. It is generally accepted that there are three different memory systems; sensory memory, short term memory and long term memory. These distinctions were first defined by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1971). Sensory memory is that which holds information from the senses for up to several seconds at the most. Short-term memory in contrast, is whatever we are thinking about at any given moment and has a relatively rapid input and retrieval. Miller (1965) argued that human short term memory has a span of approximately seven items, plus or minus two. ...read more.

Middle

Specifically he lacked the ability to transfer new short term memories into long term ones. He could repeat information for many minutes, but if distracted, even briefly, he would forgot. HM is not an isolated case and thus the role of the temporal lobes is clearly essential in human memory. This study therefore aims to assess the effects of the chunking of items and the presence of a distracter technique prior to recall on short term memory.It is hypothesised that chunked items without a distraction will facilitate greater recall than chunked items followed by a distraction. In addition it is hypothesised that chunked items without distraction will result in greater recall than non chunked items with a distraction. Overall, chunked items will be more successful in terms of recall then non chunked items and the presence of the distracter will result in a deterioration in recall. The null hypothesis, therefore infers that there will be no difference in recall between the conditions. Methodology. Participants were 20 male and female undergraduate students, aged between 18-19 years who participated voluntarily. The sample is highly female biased (15 female and 5 males were recruited). ...read more.

Conclusion

helping them to remember things on a day-day basis and that they should bear in mind that distractions are likely to cause memory loss. Individuals should also bear in mind the evidence which suggests that only between five to nine items can usually be held in short term memory. This study would have benefited from a larger sample size and a greater proportion of male participants in order to examine the possibility that there are gender effects. In addition it would be interesting to look at a wider demographic by including individuals from a broader age range. It would be interesting to expand this study in order to investigate the possibility that the type of distracter technique in particular, exerts an influence over recall. For example would these effects be replicated if the participant were required to read the distracter themselves rather than listening to it? Or to speak it aloud themselves? Greater attention should also be paid to strength of the distracter technique required to create these effects. It is hoped that future research will tackle these issues in order to increase our knowledge in this field and to continue to offer help for patients suffering from memory deficits. Word Count: 2087 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Jennifer Sanders ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Define short-term memory and describe the main factors that influence the number of items ...

    4 star(s)

    Nairne states that the case for the standard model has lost much of its support over the past decade. He clearly defines the fact that remembering is always a joint function of trace properties and retrieval cues, if this is the case, it would not make sense that a single

  2. The effect of chunking on memory recall in STM.

    Then I played the chunked numbers one after the other with gaps in between each mobile number so the participant could say their answers. I wrote sown their answers as they said them. At the end of the test I thanked the participant and asked them if they had any questions.

  1. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    as this is neither to harsh nor too lenient. Method * Design The investigation was a laboratory experiment, in which the independent variable was manipulated to observe effect on the dependent variable under controlled conditions. The investigation used this research method to minimise confounding variables, draw causal conclusions and in addition, investigation/study can be replicated without difficulty.

  2. Stroop Effect

    * Consent: This ensures that all participants must have given their consent to participate in the study Due to the nature of the study, informed consent was not given and as a result, the participants were deceived. If they knew the nature of the study, then they will alternate their behaviour and distort the findings.

  1. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    By grouping in three's there are three groups (chunks) but grouping in pairs there are five chunks. Simons (1974) established that the size of the chunk did have an effect on memory. He found that fewer longer chunks, such as eight word phrases, were recalled compared to the shorter chunks, one syllable words.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    For example I wished to see if I was to give a participant a list of words that are un-chunked and then a list of words that were chunked, if there would be a difference in recall of the words of the participant.

  1. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    The conclusion of this experiment is that serial position of magazine advertisements within a list does affect recall of products from those adverts, particularly in the primacy and recency positions (1-4 and 13-16). Introduction Previous research and theory: The serial position effect incorporates the primacy and recency effect.

  2. Does the use of a distracter affect short-term memory?

    They presented trigrams of consonants to participants and asked them to recall after 3 seconds, 6 seconds, 9 seconds, 12 seconds, 15 seconds or 18 seconds. The distracter was applied between the initial presentation of the trigram and the recall time to prevent rehearsing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work