• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The evidence for short term memory and its hypothetical construct and its nature

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The evidence for short term memory and its hypothetical construct and its nature (w/word limit) The recency effect is another method of assessing the very small capacity of short term memory. The recency affect can be measured using "free recall", a process wherebye participants are shown a list of words and asked to recall them in any order immediately after the list was presented. The recency effect is demonstrated by the fact that the last few items in a list are usually much better remembered than items from the middle of the list. In 1966 two psychologists Glanzer and Cunitz found that people could remember a similar number of words from earlier in the recall list but not the few at the end, if the recall test involved "interference" i.e. ...read more.

Middle

Participants were required to remember a fairly artificial kind of data: trigrams ( three consonants) and then later recall them after different, set, time periods. They were also given an interference task to prevent them rehearsing the trigram. The simple nature of this experiment meant that we could clearly identify the effect of the independent variable (time delay) on the dependant variable (recall). The conclusion was that short-term memory would just about disappear after 18 seconds. Short term memory can also be defined by the concept of encoding, a concept likely to be less familiar than the capacity and duration of short-term memory. Encoding refers to the way in which information is stored in the memory. It was found by the psychologist Baddely using free recall, that short-term memory largely uses an acoustic code where the words are stored in relation to the way they sound. ...read more.

Conclusion

They studied a participant who had suffered brain damage. The participant had no problem with long-term memory, but had an extremely poor digit span indicating his short-term memory was drastically reduced. Combined with the knowledge of amnesia - when a person loses much of their long-term memory due to brain damage but had almost normal short-term memories, it was suggested that different parts of the brain are involved in short-term and long-term memory. Further studies from Warrington and Shallice gave additional insight into short term memory. It was found that the participant earlier assessed would forget things that were heard much more than the forgetting of visual stimuli. They also found that the participants short-term memory deficit was limited to verbal materials and did not extend to meaningful sounds. This further suggested that there is a number of different stores of more than one short term memory, each represented in different parts of the brain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate nature of short term memory using studies e.g. capacity, duration and ...

    3 star(s)

    Conclusions of the study were that immediate memory span represents the number of items that can be verbally spoken in approx 2 seconds-regardless of their length. Criticisms of the study were that the fact more short words could be recalled could be credited to the fact that short words are

  2. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    It was also found that the information was recalled if it had personal importance or specific meaning to the participant. The study also lacks mundane realism as people rarely learn lists of words therefore it is unable to be generalised to real life situation.

  1. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    The results are therefore significant at the 0.01 level of significance (p<0.01) for a one tailed hypothesis. . Blow is a summary table for the results of the Mann Whitney U test. N1 N2 Value of U' Critical value of U' Hypothesis Probability value 20 20 105.5 114 One tailed

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    Basically the "U curve" shows that the participant will show greater recall of words at the beginning and at the end whereas the middle part will show lower level of recall.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    Any difference in recall will be due to chance factors. This means that any difference in the dependant variable, this being the recall amount is not due to the independent variable and that it is due to chance factors. Therefore the distraction of music has not affected the results.

  2. Investigation into acoustic and visual encoding in short-term memory

    In conclusion, Baddeley stated that long-term memory makes use of semantic rather than acoustic coding. One other study that looked into the notion of acoustic confusion was carried out by Conrad (1964). The aim of the investigation was to find out whether people would use acoustic coding in STM even when information is presented visually to them.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    You have just participated in the (resting/synonym/antonym) condition. Thank you." Results Descriptive statistics First, the results table was generated showing the calculated measure of central tendency and the measure of dispersion for each condition (Resting, Synonym, and Antonym). This is shown below.

  2. Some psychologists believe that we simply rehearse things and that is how we remember. ...

    Group three fill out the questionnaires with no present odours. Group one showed the best recall, with their second attempt not much different than the first. Group two as expected showed better recall on the second questionnaire then on the first one and group three showed the worst recall on both of them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work