• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate what if participants were exposed to normative social influence in a solution were there could be no doubt about the correct answer to a question? How would they conform?

Extracts from this document...


Conformity- Research Sheet Asch (1956) Aim- To investigate what if participants were exposed to normative social influence in a solution were there could be no doubt about the correct answer to a question? How would they conform? Procedures- Asch designed a simple, straightforward and unambiguous task. Participants were presented with two cards. On one card was a single 'standard' line; on the other were three ' comparison' lines. Participants were asked to judge which of the comparison lines was equal in length to the standard line. Various pairs of cards were used. * Controlled- a controlled group of 37 participants were given the task. A control group is used for comparison with the experimental group. The factors expected to influence the experimental group's behaviour - in this case pressure to conform- are removed. The participants were simply asked to judge the comparison lines without any social pressure to conform to the judgments made by other people. Thirty-five members of the control group made no errors, one made a single error and one made two errors. This indicates that the task was straightforward and unambiguous. * Experimental- there was only one participant, the rest were confederates working with Asch. ...read more.


because they could not bear to be in a minority of one and risk ridiculed or excluded by the group. * Effects of varying procedures- 1. A non -unanimous majority- Asch found that levels of conformity dropped dramatically when just one other participant dissented from the majority and supported the na�ve participant. A number of studies investigating the effects of dissenters have shown that a dissenter only had to give a different answer from the majority, even a different wrong answer, for conformity levels to be reduced. 2. The size of majority consisted of only two people, conformity responses in na�ve participants dropped to 12.8 per cent of their total judgements. Optimum conformity effects (32 per cent of responses) were found with a majority of three. Increasing the size of the majority beyond three did not increase the levels of conformity found. 3. Losing or gaining a partner- the effect of losing a partner was tested by having the na�ve participant start with 'partner' who responded correctly to begin with but who 'deserted' to the majority in the middle of the procedure. This resulted in conformity levels of 28.5 per cent n critical judgements. ...read more.


It can be argued it has a certain advantages over normal, everyday social settings. Asch's line-matching experiments illustrate this. Why create an artificial situation in which people- the confederates- behaves in such an unreal manners? Why confront partcipiants with complete strangers? The answer is that if participants conform in this setting it will show the power o pure group pressure. The confederates strangers- the participants will never see them again so in this respect their disapproval won't mean that much. The experiment has therefore created a situation to indicate the power of group pressure. Everything else that might encourage conformity has been stripped away. We would unlikely to find a similar to study outside laboratory. * Furman and Duke (1988) -examined conformity in more real-life situations have demonstrated how others may be the source of influence, especially when people were uncertain how to act. Furman and Duke (1988) asked students to listen o two versions of each orchestral excerpt. The students were either majoring I music on their degree programme or were majoring in another subject. Each student, on their own, selected a preferred version for each of the ten pairs of excerpts. They were then individually tested in the presence of three confederates who unanimously stated a verbal preference. However, the publicity stated preferences of non-music majors were significantly affected by the preferences of the confederates. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    condition of the experiment, for example the participants may guess what the experiment is about. A field experiment was selected because unlike a laboratory experiment where you have to get your participants into a laboratory where it will take more time to complete, this can be done relatively quickly.

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Pingree (1978) challenged the idea of anti-stereotypes. He found that adolescent boys showed stronger stereotypes after they were shown commercials with women in non-traditional roles. Stimulation Hypothesis This explanation claims that media can have enormous potential for education. This maybe in terms of providing suitable models for children to imitate

  1. Social Pressure and Perception

    When confronted with a unanimous incorrect answer by the other group members, the mean subject conformed on 4 of the 12 trials. Asch was disturbed by these results: The tendency to conform in our society is so strong that reasonably intelligent and well-meaning young people are willing to call white black.

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    This is true only to a certain point. A group size of about three to four people will exert pressure to conform. However, a larger group size does not increase the likelihood of conformity. Finally, having an ally - someone who disagrees with the majority- results in much less conformity than when no social support exists for the target of conformity.

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    For example in order for me to get the average score for the male in the real couple A, I added all of the scores he received and divided that number by 20 (the number of participants who rated him).

  2. investigating levels of majority influence

    Before starting the experiment all the participants were told they had a right to withdraw at any time. A copy of this script can be seen in appendix B. The participants were then shown images through a slide-show, with one experimenter controlling the slide-show and asking the participants for their opinions.

  1. Mate Selection and Preferences Across Decades

    100 participants from a web-based survey responded to a series of nine questions. Participants were random and not based on age, race, gender, cultural background, or location. The websites, www.surveymonkey.com and www.livejournal.com, were utilized by the researcher to collect and analyze data of the participants.

  2. Theories of Asch and Tajfel

    the minority to impose a change on a majority, especially if that norm has had time to evolve for 2 years. If a group majority were to accept the new group norm, they must all conform to the new norm.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work