• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence of God. (25 marks) The design argument can be used by theists, to provide evidence to support the existence of God, although there are many issues surrounding the validity of this theory. The basic argument consists of five main points, each of which can be used to suggest the need for a designer. It is the fact that these points merely suggest there is a designer, yet many theist philosophers leap from this, to the idea of the designer being God, which causes friction surrounding the argument. Firstly, there are regularities in the behaviour of world, and laws of nature seem to be a true and regular concept most of the time. This suggests the world contains order and structure. A an example of this can be seen with the formation of the human body, and how such a complex structure is created in a set way, each and every time. Swinburne believes in 'design qua regularity', meaning he believes that due to the design evident in the world, there must be a designer. Furthermore, he believed that the designer must be external, to enable him to impose this regularity without being part of it - the only being external to our world, which we know of, is God. So, for Swinburne, the evidence of regularity can support the idea of there being a God. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, the eye has a definite, although varied, set of purposes, which it has been designed to fulfil. Aquinas had a 'design qua purpose' view to the design argument. He believed that when looking at the world, a clear level of design is evident and that everything within the world has a function - even when this purpose is unknown. Aquinas believed that these things carried out their function simply because they are designed that way. Thus, as everything is working towards an end purpose, God must be the 'driving force' (2) behind the world. Furthermore, most scientists are now happy to agree that the chances of the universe of being created, and then evolving, in the way that it has, by random chance or chaos is so small that its not worth calculating. This idea of probability can be seen in the instance of a storm. For a storm to have occur, all the elements with regards the atmosphere, have to correct - one could argue that the chances of this happening randomly are so slim that this provides evidence to support the idea of a designer. However, Hume argued that the world could have come about from a time of disorder, which would somehow explain the evident order within the world. However, Tennant would respond to this by accepting that a chaotic cause for the universe may have been possible, although the chance of all the conditions being ...read more.

Conclusion

However, one can easily argue that Hume has misunderstood this comparison. A watch is, indeed, a simplistic mechanism, however, despite this, it required a designer. Yet, the world is so much more complex that it is unimaginable to suggest that it could have come about without the intervention of a designer. Finally, Hume rejected the idea of there being just one designer, in favour of there being multiple designers. However, the principle of 'Ockham's Razor' can be taken into account to counter-criticise Hume. This principle basically rejects the idea of overcomplicating an issue, in this case, by increasing the number of designers - and thus Gods - needed to create the universe, particularly as one God, by definition, is capable of creating the world independently. To conclude, I believe the design argument is relatively successful in providing convincing proof for the existence of God. Although an atheist, like Hume, can easily come up with a number of criticisms of the argument, it is equally as easily to find enough evidence to dismiss these criticisms. However, the idea that this argument merely proves the need for a designer is understandable, as scholars have to make a leap in order to include God in the argument. Therefore, one could say this is an incomplete theory and it thus fails to conclusively prove the existence of a God. (1) 'Primary Evidence' handout. (2) 'Aquinas - a classical...' handout. (3) 'Versions of the Design...' handout. ?? ?? ?? ?? Religious Studies Date: 11/07/2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Therefore the cosmological argument can only hint at the possibility of God. The argument has two ways at looking at the universe, either it's inexplicable or that it is intelligible. So that if there is an explanation possible that explanation could be found in God.

  2. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    The arrow has a purpose. It has an intelligence (of sorts) because an intelligent being has fired it. The direction must be from an external source, from God to the universe. The archer would give it a final cause and purpose and direction, God made everything good. The archer (God)

  1. What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God?

    nor does it have a real value in helping humans to live together. Therefore the ability to appreciate beauty could perhaps be suggested as a pointer towards God, which God implanted in human beings to make them indirectly aware of God's presence.

  2. Religious Experience presents a convincing argument for the existence of God. Analyse this claim.

    Unless we have overwhelming evidence to the contrary, what perceives to be so probably is. The Principle of Testimony states that in the absence of special considerations, we should believe that the experiences of others are probably as they report them.

  1. Religious experience presents a convincing argument to prove the existence of God. Analyse this ...

    God is not material and does not have a definite location. The main problem with this point is that you can check the claim of a material object where as you cannot check the claim of a religious experience with God.

  2. The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God. ...

    The third private religious experience is when an individual reflects upon their life and concludes that God was in fact guiding them. These categories agree with the above statement as they emphasise the fact that many people have religious experiences thus there is no real lack of evidence in this sense.

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    But because we can imagine it existing then it must exist. This argument on the outset appears to be strong; however, it has its flaws. First, the argument relies on us acknowledging the God is the greatest conceivable being and that the it posses necessary existence.

  2. The design arguments prove Gods existence. Assess this view.

    Aquinas uses some fundamental ideas that third century BCE philosopher Aristotle had stated, that all organisms in nature have a purpose, for example ducks have webbed, in order for them to swim better, although Aristotle claims this was just a fact about nature rather an indication of a designer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work