• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence of God. (25 marks) The design argument can be used by theists, to provide evidence to support the existence of God, although there are many issues surrounding the validity of this theory. The basic argument consists of five main points, each of which can be used to suggest the need for a designer. It is the fact that these points merely suggest there is a designer, yet many theist philosophers leap from this, to the idea of the designer being God, which causes friction surrounding the argument. Firstly, there are regularities in the behaviour of world, and laws of nature seem to be a true and regular concept most of the time. This suggests the world contains order and structure. A an example of this can be seen with the formation of the human body, and how such a complex structure is created in a set way, each and every time. Swinburne believes in 'design qua regularity', meaning he believes that due to the design evident in the world, there must be a designer. Furthermore, he believed that the designer must be external, to enable him to impose this regularity without being part of it - the only being external to our world, which we know of, is God. So, for Swinburne, the evidence of regularity can support the idea of there being a God. ...read more.


Therefore, the eye has a definite, although varied, set of purposes, which it has been designed to fulfil. Aquinas had a 'design qua purpose' view to the design argument. He believed that when looking at the world, a clear level of design is evident and that everything within the world has a function - even when this purpose is unknown. Aquinas believed that these things carried out their function simply because they are designed that way. Thus, as everything is working towards an end purpose, God must be the 'driving force' (2) behind the world. Furthermore, most scientists are now happy to agree that the chances of the universe of being created, and then evolving, in the way that it has, by random chance or chaos is so small that its not worth calculating. This idea of probability can be seen in the instance of a storm. For a storm to have occur, all the elements with regards the atmosphere, have to correct - one could argue that the chances of this happening randomly are so slim that this provides evidence to support the idea of a designer. However, Hume argued that the world could have come about from a time of disorder, which would somehow explain the evident order within the world. However, Tennant would respond to this by accepting that a chaotic cause for the universe may have been possible, although the chance of all the conditions being ...read more.


However, one can easily argue that Hume has misunderstood this comparison. A watch is, indeed, a simplistic mechanism, however, despite this, it required a designer. Yet, the world is so much more complex that it is unimaginable to suggest that it could have come about without the intervention of a designer. Finally, Hume rejected the idea of there being just one designer, in favour of there being multiple designers. However, the principle of 'Ockham's Razor' can be taken into account to counter-criticise Hume. This principle basically rejects the idea of overcomplicating an issue, in this case, by increasing the number of designers - and thus Gods - needed to create the universe, particularly as one God, by definition, is capable of creating the world independently. To conclude, I believe the design argument is relatively successful in providing convincing proof for the existence of God. Although an atheist, like Hume, can easily come up with a number of criticisms of the argument, it is equally as easily to find enough evidence to dismiss these criticisms. However, the idea that this argument merely proves the need for a designer is understandable, as scholars have to make a leap in order to include God in the argument. Therefore, one could say this is an incomplete theory and it thus fails to conclusively prove the existence of a God. (1) 'Primary Evidence' handout. (2) 'Aquinas - a classical...' handout. (3) 'Versions of the Design...' handout. ?? ?? ?? ?? Religious Studies Date: 11/07/2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    The various 'atrocities' through which both humans & animals have suffered would not go unpunished if they were the result of Human agency. Mill therefore concluded that the world cannot be ordered, and he rejects the idea that it is the result of intelligent design.

  2. What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God?

    considerable strength to the argument, assuming of course one accepts that one really is being confronted with design in the first place. There is a danger of turning the argument from design on its head, for example, one must realise that human arms were not divinely designed to be at

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    A supporter of Aquinas may know he held odd views about astrology. He may therefore concede that many particular events are demonstrably mistaken. But he can also add that this point is utterly irrelevant to the arguments of the second way.

  2. Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God.

    Piaget also asked boys of different ages, about their views on punishment in hypothetical situations, asking them to make moral judgements. The younger children focused on the severity of the outcome, (external responsibility), whereas older children distinguished between the outcome and whether it occurred as a result of someone doing something wrong, (internal responsibility).

  1. Critically assess the design argument

    David Hume was a philosopher who strongly criticised the God hypothesis as well as the design argument. According to him we don't have enough knowledge and experience to conclude that God is a designer. Also - he says - if there is a God who theists claim is benevolent then

  2. Explain the main features of the design argument for the existence of God.Science makes ...

    However, they succeeded in explaining the design argument, because they used strong and clear evidence. b.) 'Science makes the design argument irrelevant' assess the claim (AO2 15 marks) To an extent, I agree with the claim that science makes the design argument irrelevant.

  1. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    The Cosmological argument is undoubtedly logically in its progression, as each premise follows the other, backed up with universal evidence. However, the fact that it is logical does not mean the explanation is a correct one. Some philosophers have argued that the existence of the universe is far more complex

  2. Does Religious Experience offer a convincing argument for God

    people claimed to experience similar symptoms such as ?stomach crunching? and ?laughter.? (ii)However, many people may argue that religious experiences don?t actually offer a convincing argument for the existence of God. John Wisdom?s Parable of the Gardener demonstrates this interpretation difference.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work