• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Briefly outline Plato's definition of justice and morality and compare it to Thrasymachus and conventional ideas of this concept.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Briefly outline Plato's definition of justice and morality and compare it to Thrasymachus and conventional ideas of this concept. Plato's definition of justice in society is when everyone is doing their own tasks, mind own business to witch they are naturally suited to, when injustice is person's trying to do others job. He is explaining how exactly society is structured and how people could now what their best place and job in society is in his "magnificent myth". Basic idea is that people born with bronze, silver or gold in their soul and each of them defines wether this person is a producer, auxiliary or ruler. ...read more.

Middle

So, if the reason should be in control it is not justice if one of the other parts of soul tries to do reason's job and starts controlling person's life. For Plato justice obviously is a good thing, when in Trasymachus theory justice is for the naive people who are controlled by the stronger, who are manipulated. Trasymachus is saying, that justice is in the interest of a stronger party, meaning that what is right and what is wrong is established by ruling elite and for everyone following these laws are namely in this ruler class benefits. ...read more.

Conclusion

He had an idea that we need to live up to ours legal obligations and be honest. For example we need to give the man his due, treat friends and enemies differently. Plato had presented some objections to this view, such as returning weapon to a madman, however I thing some of the ideas of conventional morality are working within his own definition of this concept - "live up to yours legal obligations" sound very similar to "mind your own business", the only differences are that Plato presents more complex ideas of how this all works together and also he explaines separately what is justice of society and what is justice of an individual. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    cost and benefits (such as medical costs, loss of income, and damage to buildings) and these were measured on monetary terms. Ford did not take into consideration pain, sickness, death, dissatisfaction ignorance and unhappiness they brought into people lives. In order to keep ethical standards, management must follow the law.

  2. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    When someone is criticised for looking sloppy, or making an offensive remark, he may try to excuse himself with an "I could not help it" remark. But if he is a normal person mentally, then he could have helped it; he could have acted differently.

  1. Religion and Morality

    effect, but are not now because they are 'outdated', and theists argue that an omniscient God used them knowing they would be relevant for different times. These theists fail, however to a provide a logical explanation for why there is nothing in the Bible which can be related to biological

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    The idea of cosmopolitan morality argues that there are no differences between the varying state boundaries. Chris Brown, arguing from the standpoint of cosmopolitan morality, equates the world of today with that of the ancient Greek city states, saying that differences that previously mattered between the different individuals in different states no longer matter.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    preserving or extending to us, regardless of how the individuals estimate the value of their own lives. In triage, for example, a person very certain to die very soon may be competent enough to demand treatment; nevertheless, we may favor a patient with a greater chance for a long and full life after treatment.

  2. Self-interest plays no part in genuine morality

    The first is I see that someone has water and I can just tell him that I am thirsty and take his water. The other possibility is, telling him to bring me water. This is how we should not treat others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work