• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Descartes - Philosophy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Jessalyn Parsons Descartes? Religious Journey to find God In the book Meditations on First Philosophy, Rene? Descartes states many theories and makes many points on a numerous amount of things. In ?Meditation One: Concerning Those Things That Can Be Called Into Doubt?, I struggled with what Descartes was actually saying in terms of God, did he believe in His existence or didn?t he? However, by ?Meditation Three: Concerning God, That He Exists?, I realized where Descartes stood religiously. I agree with Descartes when he doubts the existence of God in the first two meditations because by the third he has found his own way and proof that God does exist and to believe in Him. Descartes has many things that he considers to be reasonable to doubt. Throughout Descartes? life he has had a long standing opinion that there is a God who is able to do anything who has actually created Descartes himself. He has believed in God?s existence and God?s creations his whole life. However, in Meditation I he is trying to clear his mind of what he believes in, and consider others beliefs that contradict his. He finds himself questioning, ?How do I know he did not bring it about that there is no Earth at all? ...read more.

Middle

He sees himself now as having no hands, eyes, flesh, blood, any senses; they are just false beliefs that he possesses these things. Even though it is no longer in his power that he knows anything true, it is within his power to take care decisively, to withhold his assent to what is false, although more powerful, however clever and smart this evil genius may be, to have any effect on him. Descartes decides to put aside all of his doubts, as though he has discovered all of his doubts to be false, and decides to stay on this course until he knows something for certain, or in fact that he discovers for certain that nothing is certain. In ?Meditation III: Concerning God, That He Exists?, Descartes closes his eyes, stops his ears, turns away his senses from their objects and begins endeavoring a more intimate knowledge of his self. He clarifies that he is a thinking thing, that he doubts, affirms, denies, knows few objects, and is also ignorant of many things. He recognizes that he is able to love, hate, and perceive. Descartes says that he cannot be certain of anything without knowing if God exists and if he can deceive. The idea of God is that he is infinite, independent, all powerful and all knowing, the creator of absolutely everything on this Earth, the creator of the earth, the universe, everything. ...read more.

Conclusion

An explanation that he did not refer to is the devil. The bible explains to us that God is good and the Devil is bad. From personal experiences, I used to struggle with why God would allow such horrible things to happen, why did he let my friends die in car crashes, why does death even exist at all? However, later in life, I discovered that the bad does not necessarily come from God, but it comes from the devil. We are to do our best to avoid hateful acts and to overcome evil, which are works of the devil. God is our creator and our reason for being, but we also have a responsibility and choice of life. He has created a world for us that we have taken advantage of and that has managed to unfortunately gain many evil acts and people. We are supposed to live by the bible, if we do not then God?s plan and course is taken astray. Although He ultimately controls everything, He also allows us to make our own decisions, choose our own paths, learn from our mistakes, and suffer the consequences of those mistakes. It is in our control to determine where we want to go in our lives and where we want to end up in our afterlife. After all, for those of us who believe in God, our being here on earth is only to prepare us for our after life, which hopefully will someday take us to Heaven. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    * Humans have a propensity to sensationalise, which prompts us to uncritically perpetuate miracle stories. Hume claims that humans have a passion of surprise and wonder and this agreeable emotion makes them believe the reports of miracles. This is a tendency of the mind that is exactly opposite to the principle of habit.

  2. Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt

    Descartes does not allow things to be quite this easy however. He admits that there is a great difference between being mistaken when you see something far off in the foggy distance, and something immediately I may not be sure if that is Wayne Rooney in the distance on a

  1. The Search for Certainty - Descartes, Meditations.

    Descartes' use of the word doubt was adequate and its intended meaning permissible to his society. Unless Wittingstein knew for sure that both mentioned cultures were identical the grounds for his argument is substandard. A good analogy to support Descartes' doubt argument is that of swans.

  2. Descartes Meditations

    If we suppose there is no God, then there is even greater likelihood of being deceived, since our imperfect senses would not have been created by a perfect being. Descartes likens himself to being 'like a prisoner who is enjoying an imaginary freedom while asleep', and 'as he begins to

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    Xenophan was a pantheist--> One who identifies God/s/ with the world. Spinoza was also a pantheist . They said that God & the world are organically inseparable (meaning they can never be divided). He means that God/ divine are immanent --> meaning same thing.

  2. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    understand how philosophy "happens" in that context, even if one is using the analytic approach. It can also be argued that historically speaking the distinction between Western and non-western philosophy is to a certain extent artificial and that it is by no means necessary to assume every culture to have their own philosophy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work