• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt' Descartes stated aim in the Meditations is to find something 'firm and constant in the senses'. His only interest is finding out what we can know, and as this is his sole aim he has a clear definition of knowledge-knowledge is that which is indubitable. This clearly sets the Meditations as a prime example f first philosophy- philosophy, which deals with the most central and essential questions of epistemology. If knowledge is that which is indubitable, Descartes reasons that the way to find anything which you cannot doubt is to abandon all those ideas and beliefs which he has had throughout his life which he can find reason to doubt. Descartes properly sets out his method of doubt in his book 'Discourse on the Method', but it is essential to clarify what his method is before we can move onto Meditation 1 in full and the possible criticisms of it. Descartes chosen method is 'foundationalism', where he systematically attacks the sources of our knowledge rather than just the individual examples of it. Descartes logic in this is sound-if he tested every individual belief that he had, it would a huge amount of time. ...read more.


He states that even in a dream we cannot make up entirely new things, merely composites of other things. So while it is legitimate through the use of the dream argument to doubt complex things like science or philosophy, we cannot doubt the simplest concepts like mathematics and geometry. These simple building blocks are adventitious-they come from outside and are put into our 'dream world'. In dream or reality, Descartes admits, two plus three will always equal five. This leads Descartes on to his third and final wave of doubt. Descartes begins by asserting his belief in an all powerful, all loving deity who would not allow us to be deceived about our beliefs about the external world. However, it is surely against his all loving nature for Descartes to be deceived some of the time, and yet he allows this. Resolving that he must take his scepticism to some may say implausible lengths, Descartes supposes that there is 'some evil demon, no less cunning and deceiving than powerful, who has used all his artifice to deceive me.' This demon, Descartes things could be using his cunning to make Descartes believe that two plus three equals five when really it equals six. ...read more.


However, the Importance of these two waves can be overestimated. Descartes merely uses these as a warm up to get the reader into his methods and involved in the process of doubt. It is the example of the evil demon which is really important, as this throws absolutely all of our knowledge into doubt. And unlike the other two waves, it is very difficult to logically object to this wave. Undoubtedly, it is extremely unlikely, but this is not the point-it is possible. The argument used is not self-refuting, and as with the more modern iteration of us all being brains in a jar being poked and prodded into the appropriate sensory experience, it is impossible to prove that it is not the case. In conclusion therefore, I would argue that while it is an exaggeration to claim that Descartes is a global sceptic, and his method of doubt is far from perfect, in the most important area, the third wave of doubt, Descartes is successful, and we are forced to accept that just like Descartes, there is nothing which we could not for certain claim was not a falsity caused by a manipulating evil demon. In what Descartes set out to do, he is successful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Descartes Meditations

    He writes, 'I shake my head and it is not asleep; as I stretch out and feel my hand I do so deliberately, and I know what I am doing', he then argues that while dreaming there have been similar instances in which he believes himself to be awake, only

  2. Assess Decartes Sceptical Doubt and Its Use in the Quest For Certainty

    However this is an incorrect conclusion and his argument is self refuting. His premiss, "My Senses sometimes fool me" cannot lead to "My Senses could always be fooling me". The only way that we can relise that our senses sometime fool us, is that they are not deceived for the

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Hume would also object to Descartes by using his 'fork' from 'An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding'. Hume's 'fork' two claims 1. All knowledge can be neatly divided in 'relations of ideas' and 'matters of fact'. This means that statements are either analytic or synthetic.

  2. How successful are Descartes' arguments for the real distinction of mind from body? Upon ...

    the deepest cunning, who is constantly employing all his ingenuity in deceiving me. Doubtless, then, I exist, since I am deceived; and, let him deceive me as he may, he can never bring it about that I am nothing, so long as I shall be conscious that I am something.

  1. The Search for Certainty - Descartes, Meditations.

    tomorrow, but unless one experiences tomorrow's weather, one has no grounds to doubt otherwise. The weather could be sunny, but it could also be stormy only experience is ultimate evidence. Wittingstein therefore stated that Descartes' lack of relativism meant his doubting was made on no grounds.

  2. Introduction to Philosophy.

    THIS MEANS THAT WE CANNOT KNOW OBJECTIVE RUTH AS THERE IS NO OBJECTIVE VIEW. > In a sophist discussion there is destruction as they introduce DDOUBT in their answers. > Skeptic people, like sophists, never believed that there is truth present in a fact.

  1. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    type of thinking that does not meet the criteria I have presented cannot be regarded as philosophy, but is some other form of intellectual practice.7 2. The Nature of Chinese Philosophy The Western and Chinese civilisations developed almost entirely independently of one another and this can explain many differences in their ways of thinking.

  2. Reflection on Descartes' Second Medtitation

    After that he comes to conclusion that if he could persuade himself that there is no his body, no his senses, no sky above him, it does not mean that He (I in the view of Descartes) does not exist as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work