• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and explain the distinctive features of 'natural law' and 'situation ethics'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe and explain the distinctive features of 'natural law' and 'situation ethics'. The theories of natural law and situation ethics are far from concrete, and the impact of the contemporary 'new natural law,' led by the American philosopher Germain Grisez, appears to be a great one. Yet despite modern modifications, the two concepts are essentially deep-routed within human thinking. However, they were formulated at opposite ends of the second millennium: St. Thomas Aquinas' 13th century Summa Theologica developed Aristotle and Cicero's ideas of 'natural law', and the explicit conclusions of 'situation ethics' were created by Joseph Fletcher in the early 1960s. Both deal with the human need to astutely with every day dilemmas. Natural law takes the view that the absolute principle of love should be a consideration of every decision made, whilst situation ethics discredits any absolute idea other than that of human happiness. First Aristotle (384-322 BCE) and then Cicero (106-43 BCE) introduced the idea of a natural law "which everywhere is equally valid" (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics). Aristotle believed that "that which is natural is unchangeable, and has the same power everywhere." ...read more.

Middle

Following these precepts is seen as a way as reaching the 'end' of God. For example, protected or homosexual intercourse is seen as morally wrong because it prevents the fulfilment of God's first intention: reproduction. Aquinas rejected the idea of 'original sin,' preferring to believe that humans never intentionally pursuit evil; rather, evil is "sought indirectly, namely because it is the consequence of some good." Any sin committed whilst not in the quest for moral perfection were seen as simply a 'falling short' within the human consciousness. To 'sinners,' the act they perpetrate is an apparent good, but can easily be avoided by looking beyond 'unnatural' desires and into one's 'natural' conscience in order to find the right thing to do. Aquinas acknowledges that this can be a difficult task, and asserts that if people do not take care to look into the ideas of right and wrong, habitual immorality can develop. He stressed that this immortality is present in both the intention and carrying out of an act, and that to act in a good way for the wrong reason is to perform a good exterior act but a bad interior one. ...read more.

Conclusion

Situation ethics is an moral belief-system placed between these two extremes; it approaches moral dilemmas with the principles of the person's particular tradition. However, the 'situationist' is prepared to compromise these principles if love would be better served by doing so; he "follows a moral law or violates it according to love's need." Fletcher believed all situationists should enter moral decisions with the backbone principles of pragmatism, relativism, positivism and personalism. Situationists' pragmatism should ensure that the action taken works towards the end result of love; they should "relativize the absolute"; they should see that God is love, and thus follow the ethics with positivism; and they should put people first: personalism. These 'backbone' principles lead onto six main ones. First, that "only one thing is intrinsically good; namely love," secondly that "The ruling norm of Christian decision is love," thirdly that "Love and Justice are the same," fourthly that "love wills the neighbour's good," fifthly that "Only the end justifies the means," and sixth, "Love's decisions are made situationally, not prescriptively." These principles break away from traditional Christian beliefs as they see all actions as neither intrinsically 'good' nor intrinsically 'bad.' The moral correctness or any act "depends on whether love is fully served." 3/2/2005 Luke Bullen MLW ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Compare and contrast the ethical theories of natural law and situation ethics.

    As a result of the major flaws that appear in the theory of natural law, a Teleological approach to ethics was later introduced by the Anglican theologian, Joseph Fletcher, although the basic ideas of situation ethics have a much longer history.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    Elderly, weak, lonely and depressed people could feel that euthanasia is the right way to go and a doctor who is not particularly worried about his patients, rather his efficiency, he would encourage the act. "This is called the slippery slope argument.

  1. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    Aquinas believed that humans could use their reasoning to work out what the final causes of there existence were, and by acting in accordance with them would be a good action whilst seeking to frustrate them would be considered a bad action.

  2. Examine and comment on Christian beliefs about homosexuality

    (Some Issues in Human Sexuality - a guide to the debate - commended by the House of Bishops in 2003) Evangelical Christians say that monogamous hetreosexual marriage is the only form of partenship approved by God for a full sexual relationship.

  1. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    One can start to picture the difficulties with natural law- does one let a whole community die for the exception of the torture of one man? Mans purpose is not follow apparent goods! The ironic concept is, is that natural law claims if one follows one reason and purpose at all times then it will achieve a morally just world!

  2. Examine the key features of Virtue Ethics

    Robert Louden has argued that virtue ethics cannot resolve moral dilemmas. He stated that as virtue ethics is focused on the individual, it neither resolves nor attempts to resolve big moral dilemmas. It may help make the moral agent virtuous but it does not give any answers relating to an ethical crisis.

  1. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    However, it can be argued that it is not possible to compare organ donation with pregnancy because by definition pregnancy entails special parent obligations, not necessarily entailed organ transplants. Some feminists have fought for the right to abort because they contend that it is the right of the mother to choose what happens to her body.

  2. Identify the distinctive characteristics of situation ethics. ii.) Consider the view that situation ...

    John Robinson, who was the Bishop of Woolwich, threw the Church into turmoil by arguing that Christianity needed to embrace the ?new morality? and that the only law in Ethics should be ?the law of love?. Robinson was in support of Situation Ethics and wanted to attempt applying a Christian moral view to changing society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work