• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the ethical theories of natural law and situation ethics.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the ethical theories of natural law and situation ethics. There are two main approaches to ethics which are held by Christians today. Over the years it has proved to be a very controversial and widely debated issue. Catholics and certain other 'strict' denominations of the Christian church hold the view that natural law should be the means of making ethical decisions, whereas more liberal Christians consider situation ethics as a more suitable ethical system to go by. Natural law was advocated by St Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century. It states that all ethical decisions should be made by looking at the absolute moral laws which have been laid down for us by God. For Christians these stem from The Ten Commandments. Believers in this are known as Ethical Deontologists. They maintain that an action is intrinsically good, bad, right or wrong. When faced with a moral dilemma, one should refer to the Law, irrespectively of what the outcome will be. It is suggested that the human purpose of life is to live and reproduce, to live harmoniously, to learn and to worship God. ...read more.


Actions are good if they help human beings and they are bad if they hurt people - there are no other criteria. What is right in one case may be wrong in another. The individual and the situation are the only important thing when making a decision, rather than applying a principle (for example 'thou shalt not kill'). The following quotations help to summarise situation ethics, "There is only one ultimate and invariable duty, and its formula is 'Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself'. How to do this is another question, but this is the whole of moral duty." (William Temple)... "The law of love is the ultimate law because it is the negation of law; it is absolute because it concerns everything concrete...the absolutism of love is its power to go into concrete situations." (Paul Tillich) Even though the teleological approach is a relative theory of ethics, it still involves an absolute law which is to do everything in love. However, the relativity of this theory allows room for exceptions to rules. Relativism doesn't imply that anything goes. ...read more.


Bishop John Robinson once wrote, 'There is no one ethical system that can claim to be Christian' and I completely agree with that. A supporter of the natural law approach asks what the law says and the situationist asks what is the best decision to help human beings, but why can't there be a middle ground? We should be able to use what was once the Law as a guideline when making ethical decisions rather than sticking rigidly to one approach just for the sake of theological argument. The Pope believes that the Law is 'God's revealed will' but it could be said that God revealed his will most fully through Jesus' time on Earth. Not only did He preach on the importance of love, but He also showed us perfect examples of it throughout His life. It is the subtle difference between these doctrines that lies at the heart of many issues which are in hot debate at the moment. If the Church could ignore these theological ambiguities and become reunited, perhaps they could then learn to fulfill their purpose in Christ. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    Aquinas sought to work out what these final causes were along with the purpose of human life, and broke down the purpose of human existence into five final causes known as the primary precepts. These are recognised as to reproduce, to live in society, to worship God, the educate children and to protect life.

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    If euthanasia were good, it should be the duty of everyone, at least everyone in that situation. But euthanasia can not be a universal duty, and therefore, it can not be a good duty, and therefore, lacks moral value. Kant says that actions should be based on what is good.

  1. "Religious ethics are not the best approach to environmental issues". Discuss.

    out-weighs the suffering that environmental damage will inflict upon both human and non-human life forms. In terms of the propinquity of the pleasure, the Felicific Calculus favours the Chinese population, as they are likely to benefit relatively quickly. However when considering the purity of the pleasure, one cannot be certain

  2. The founder of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher felt that the individual should be of ...

    For what reasons in this open to criticism [7] This essay shall discuss the reasons why situation ethics is open to criticism. Firstly it shall begin by criticizing Fletcher the founder of situation ethics and his ideas. Secondly it shall analyse the negative effects of applying situation ethics.

  1. Religious Ethics are not the best approach to environmental ethics'. Discuss.

    One could interpret the use of the word 'dominion' no as despotic, but as a call for stewardship. God has chosen humanity to regulate the response of the natural world to its creator so we must care and conserve and acts as the director of nature's obedience to God.

  2. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    Either choice is unsatisfactory, and they seem at least in conflict, if not mutually exclusive. Unfortunately, the weakness in butler's theory is also one of his greatest credits. The divorce of the supremacy of conscience from divine authority is valiant but ultimately flawed.

  1. Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theories; which makes a better societal order?

    all his money away to charity because he feels so deeply about it. I also see cons to taking Mill's values on as societal ethics - they could conceivably give rise to the next Hitler. But with Kant, people would be prosecuted for EVERYTHING since there are no extenuating circumstances.

  2. Explain what is meant by a Natural Law approach to ethics

    Natural law has developed an approach in how to judge a person?s actions through interior and exterior acts. To follow our purpose and obey natural law our interior and exterior acts must be good and have the best intentions to obey god.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work