• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss critically the differing notions of power and freedom explored in the 'Gorgias'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss critically the differing notions of power and freedom explored in the 'Gorgias'. What starts off as a discussion surrounding rhetoric, within the Gorgias, quickly but unsurprisingly transcends into a dialogue concerning the nature of virtuex of which the notions of freedom and power are intrinsically linked. Plato has the dialogue played out between Socrates and four others. Gorgias a famous Sophist and rhetorician, Polus his eager student, Callicles x and Chairephon a friend of Plato who plays little part in the dialogue. This essay shall split the dialogue into three parts, with each part considering Socrates debate with each of the three main protagonists. In each instance, the ideas of each individual regarding power and freedom will be expressed, Socrates' response examined and the resulting implications surrounding his personal ideas explored. From this analysis, any overriding ideas throughout the dialogue may then be distinguished. Throughout the dialogues, power is usually the focus of discussion as opposed to freedom but it is fair to conclude that the concepts of power and freedom are so deeply intertwined that it often becomes difficult to disentangle them. Certainly Socrates and the three others seem to have similarly conflicting viewpoints regarding freedom and power. ...read more.

Middle

To complete the paradox, the philosopher claims that politicians especially are likely to be led away by others in order to gain approval rather than pursuing there own personal good which would be beneficial for them. The conclusion is that those who apparently have the most power turn out to infact have the very least. More potential chat on Polus Socrates brings up the issue of freedom by insisting on a distinction between doing as one sees fit and doing what one wants i.e negative and positve freedom. Polus has showed that the orator can do as he sees fit, but that doesn't automatically mean that he can do what he wants. Socrates argues, and Polus agrees, that some things are good, some things are bad, and some things are in themselves indifferent but can be either good or bad depending on how they're used. What we want are the good things, but sometimes we must do the indifferent things (some of which may be very disagreeable, like taking medicine or going on a sea voyage) in order to get the good things. ...read more.

Conclusion

This position is best expressed by Polus (466-69) and Callicles (490-492). Plato takes great care to debunk this formulation. On the one hand, Socrates argues, those who rule others often must perform actions they do not will in order to benefit the state of which they are in charge. In this sense then, apparently powerful tyrants are often unable to act as they will, and true power is shown to consist of something other than ruling over others. At the same time, those who repeatedly satisfy their desires do not possess real power because this gratification further fuels rather than extinguishes the appetites. A person capable of always satisfying desire is in constant need of more satisfaction, and as such possesses no true power. This point is illustrated in 493b by the metaphor of the leaky jar. Mention of probable proximity of Socrates execution to book and themes this may have inspired. Socrates views freedom for the most part, whether there is anything within that has any element of control. This would include not having any addictions or other strong needs. Ideally reducing ones needs until one is content with what is to hand is best. Kalon v agathon try and include ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. What are Mill’s four main arguments in defence of freedom of speech?

    To have suppressed these would have prevented many of the technological advances made in the late 20th century from space travel to this PC. The second of Mill's arguments regards the possibility that opinions, whilst being false, may contain an element of truth and as such their suppression would lead to that truth being lost to human development.

  2. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    Although he believed that freedom to make choices were illusions he argued that it was not the end for moral responsibility. Libetarianists would argue against that freedom is an illusion and it is not the case that all events have a cause; some events are uncaused such as human decisions and choices.

  1. We do not possess any genuine freedom to act ethically Discuss

    Many believe that by the age of seven, a child should know the difference between right and wrong, and so the first 7 years of a child's life are arguably the most important, as it is these 7 years which will help shape what kind of person they will become; and what morals they will live by.

  2. Philosophy: Life After Death Analysis

    is the worrying concept that if no part of you actually continues to the next life (for you are only being recreated) then how can you call it an afterlife. Sure, the rest of the universe can have the benefit of my everlasting existence, but to me the difference between

  1. we do not possess any genuine freedom to act ethically

    In other words, as opposed to the mechanical universe where everything thing follows from one event to another, here, events are completely random. The debate of whether we really do have the freedom to act ethically is still significant today.

  2. "Liberalism puts too much emphasis on freedom at the expense of other values." Discuss

    State interference in the economy amounts to state interference in the free transactions and activities of individuals, and is thus an infringement on liberty. It could be argued, then, that classical liberalism puts emphasis on economic freedom at the expense of economic equality, or a fairness of some sort.

  1. The Rebirth of Dialogue: Bakhtin, Socrates, and the Rhetorical Tradition by James P. Zappen. ...

    Adkins, in whose Merit and Responsibility Zappen finds a note he sounds repeatedly: Plato's Socrates, through his constant questioning, uncovers the inherent contradiction between the Homeric cultural values of courage and cunning and the civic virtues of justice and temperance (33, 71).

  2. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    Again, it is possible to present criticism against this definition of philosophy and the approach I have laid out: one could, for example, claim that what is rational in one culture may not be regarded rational in another, and consequently the definition for philosophy offered in this essay is culturally laden.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work