• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

DNA and capital punishment

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Baker Lisa Baker Eva Barnett CW 111-1:00 25 June 2012 Capital Punishment and DNA Capital punishment is the sentence of death upon a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense (Capital Punishment). The death penalty is a very controversial issue. There are individuals who hold justice above human life and those who hold human life over justice. There are those for and against the death penalty for many reasons. Take a moment and think about a couple of instances. Darby Gillis was convicted of murder of a hot dog vendor in Chicago. A witness placed him at the scene of the crime. Ronald Jones was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder and rape of a young woman. He confessed to the crime. Open and shut cases, right? Not necessarily. What if DNA is present? In the case of Darby Gillis the witness was protecting her boyfriend who committed the murder. Ronald Jones confessed to the crime because the confession was beaten out of him by the police officers (Brooks). ...read more.


An impaired mental state due to mental illness, drugs or alcohol may also elicit false admissions of guilt. (Cardozo) Eyewitness misidentification occurs because people are truly mistaken, paid to say something else, or trying to get a lesser sentence for themselves. A survey conducted of jail informants showed that 85% would say what they thought the lawyers and police officers wanted to hear so they could get a lesser sentence. After careful investigation of the informants stories most proved to be fabricated.Some are paid to say something else to cover for someone they know. Those who are truly mistaken are some of the fewer cases of misidentification (Top 10 Pros and Cons: Should the death penalty be allowed?). Defendants get bad legal representation because lawyers either have never tried a capital case or they didn?t have the skills and resources needed. Prosecutors who are very strict in their belief of the death penalty may not care that their defendant may be innocent. The defense's resources are often severely limited by state spending allowances. ...read more.


As of June 2002 thirty-eight states has authorized the death penalty. Twelve states are still without it. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976, eighty-seven people have been freed from death row due to DNA evidence. That is one in seven people on death row! The average cost for one execution case is about $3.2 million over the costs of a life imprisonment case. The execution case includes pretrial time, experts, and attorneys, two trials (one for guilt and one for punishment), and appeals (Top 10 Pros and Cons: Should the death penalty be allowed?). In capital cases the goal should be to make sure that justice is served and fair. The defendant should have the opportunity to prove his or her innocence by DNA evidence. If this is properly carried out then there should be no doubt in our minds that we might be putting someone who is innocent to death. Even if just one innocent person is put to death is it still worth the risk? Is that life worth so little? If there is no DNA proof then the person should not be put to death. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Should capital punishment be reinstated?

    This tends to indicate that the death penalty is a deterrent. The death penalty is much more likely to be a deterrent where the crime requires planning and the potential criminal has time to think about the possible consequences. There is a strong argument here for making murder committed in

  2. Capital Punishment

    modern day is whether the execution of criminals is ever justified and if so under what circumstances is it permissible? For my project I shall address the capital punishment from a Christian perspective, and I shall find and examine texts from the Bible with a conclusion of how Christians should view Capital punishment.

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    other circumstances; therefore, an absolutist, utilitarian or relativist could argue that there would be little difference in costs because so few people would come forward to donate an organ anyway, and other negative effects of the paid system would create a worse situation than without the system.

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    They speak hatred, but what of love? How can they appoint themselves judges of another human being when they, themselves, are the ones who should be, supposedly, judged; how are they qualified to determine the fate of another man's life when their fate is still in question and their status undetermined?

  1. The only punishment that can achieve justice is retribution DISCUSS

    In terms of it being 'the only punishment that can achieve justice', other systems may work better. The idea of reformation as mentioned in the above quote refers to a system which counsels the criminal into enlightenment of what they have done and to source the stem of the problem in order to release them back into society.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    (The duty to make more life will be discussed further in Section 3.) Whether or not we are making more life, the moral center of the SL position enjoins us not to shorten or destroy the life that already exists (except possibly to save more life).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work