• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Emotivism - Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion. (33) Different groups of people have different opinions as to what moral statements are and how we arrive at them. Naturalists claim morals are part of the world and discovered using reason. Intuitionists believe we use our senses and consider the facts-intuition. However, emotivists believe moral statements to be nothing more than feelings and opinions. Some scholars believe ethical statements and moral judgements to be no more than emotive responses such as expressions of preference, attitude or feeling. It comes down to the 'Hurrah/Boo' theory. If I was to say, "Abortion is wrong", all I am really saying is that in my opinion, I believe abortion isn't right-"Boo to abortion". ...read more.

Middle

When they say they are no more than expressions of opinion, they mean that there can be no way in which we could verify the right or wrong of the statement." Murder is wrong" is merely saying that I disapprove of murder and therefore I think it is wrong. Logical Positivists are a threat to language and ethics because they undermine language. It makes all ethical language merely subjective and individual. A.J. Ayer was a logical positivist and he was interested in how you verify factual statements and how you cannot verify moral statements. He believes that moral statements have no objective validity whatsoever. Although we would say that stealing is wrong according to deontological ethics, Ayer would totally disagree and say there is no way of verifying the truth or falsehood of this statement. ...read more.

Conclusion

He believes that not all moral statements fall under the "Hurrah/Boo" theory as some are mixed as before. He also believes that all moral statements have cognitive meaning and emotive meaning. So, for example, "Sexual intercourse without the person's consent" is the cognitive meaning whereas "Rape" id the emotive meaning as it has more of an impact on the way you feel about an ethical topic. Stephenson believes there are these two different meanings because we want to steer people to our way of thinking. People have different ideas of the definitions of moral words therefore moral statements cannot be fact-only opinion. No ethical statement can be proved or disproved. One person may say "Laura is good"-maybe because of something she has done, however not everyone may believe that-it is a feeling or opinion and not fact. Monday 20th October 2003 Emma Ward 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religious Language cannot be proved, therefore it is meaningless

    be said that language is meaningless as we can never know that what it refers to really truly exists. If we look at it from an anti-realist point of view, whether it refers to a true state of affairs is irrelevant and thus a statement is meaningful because it means something to that community and affects them accordingly.

  2. Explain why there maybe problems about the meaning of ethical language

    This led to Searle to believe that it is possible to move form an 'is' to an 'ought'. However Mackie refutes this by saying that statement five is only valid if there has been the prevailing assumption throughout that Jones sees holding promises as morally good.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Simultaneously with the creation of the NBAC, Clinton called for an immediate memoratorium on any federal funding used in further research of cloning. The government seems to want to say that cloning is wrong, but they are unable to find a common ground for their accusations.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    Ethical naturalism (Definism): Is a theory that states ethical terms can be defined; the meaning of ethical sentences can be given in totally non- ethical terms. Ethical theories are like facts, and moral truths can be established so long as the evidence is looked at.

  1. "All ethical statements are relative." By examining the justifications for-and implications of- making this ...

    This highlights how ethical statements are relative. People's opinions are relative; therefore no one way of thinking is seen as supreme. Cultural differences continue to exert an enormous amount of influence on how people view ethics. Ethical statements have continued to vary as time goes by. This trend is opposite to those of other fields in science.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    In other words, analytic propositions are ones which are viably logical. The second type of statement is known as a 'synthetic' or 'a posteriori' proposition. These argue that the truth of a proposition may only be decided if empirical evidence can be provided to support its verity or falsehood.

  1. Discuss the claim that ethical and religious language is meaningless.

    Also, why, if my moral obligations are self-evident, do I have dilemmas over conflicting duties? The issue of verification is also raised; intuition may be considered to be a meaningless concept itself, since it is non-verifiable. The meaning of language and the principle of verification was at the forefront of debate in the 20th Century movement known as Logical Positivism.

  2. In your opinion, what should ethical debate really centre on?

    everyone should be honest. There is no right or wrong to that comment it is based on someone's feelings and opinions, however a normative ethic it based on what society should believe is right or wrong. It distinguishes the difference between what is a sin and what is evil.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work