• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of God based on religious experiences.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of God based on religious experiences. (21) Religious experiences are described as ?something that is not a substitute for the divine but a method that is used to bring people closer to God?. They are usually divided into two main categories; direct experiences where the person feels in direct contact with God and indirect experiences, where the person feels an inner experience of Gods action in creation. Although many scholars such as Martin Buber and Kierkegaard believe that religious experiences prove the existence of God, others such Harris and Dawkins believe that what are so called ?Religious Experiences? do not prove the existence of a greater being. It is these two contrasting schools of thought that lead to the argument I am about to discuss in the following essay, as to whether or not, religious experiences prove the existence of God. Firstly, a key argument in favor of religious experience, is a posteriori argument that relies upon the premise ?The experience of X indicates the reality of X?. From this first premise, we can claim therefore that ?The experience of God indicates the reality of God?. ...read more.

Middle

but the argument depends upon the whether or not the evidence is accurately interpreted by the experient and can therefore never be proven by scientific or tested means. The cumulative argument is provided as another attempt to prove Gods existence via the use of religious experiences, however as opposed to the other arguments it attempts to combine different arguments in one with the idea that together they are more convincing than one argument alone. However, this is debatable as an argument as it is widely believed that combining weak arguments together result in a weak argument as opposed to creating a stronger argument. Finally, the principles of Testimony and Credulity form another argument in favor of religious experiences as prove of the existence of God in claiming that in general people tell the truth and that we cannot realistically work on the basis of doubting their accounts. Just as we cannot doubt basic facts about the world because we have not experienced it ourselves. The principle of testimony claims that unless we have evidence to the contrary we should believe what is claimed, it is argued ?In the absence of special considerations, their experiences of others are as they report them?. ...read more.

Conclusion

Cole claimed that many were and still are skeptical about the religious experience of ?speaking in tongues? as the experience itself is unsound and unreliable and he claims that this experience does not match up correctly with the so called experiences we read about in the Old Testament. Another group, is near death experiences, which has been heavily criticized and called a ?mental Phenomenon that many scholars claim is not a religious experience but rather an experience that is caused by lack of oxygen to the brain in the experient. In summary, the main arguments against religious experiences, claim that if God doesn?t exist, we can therefore not experience him. We can also defer that everything is open to a non-religious interpretation as there are no tests to verify religious experiences and testimonies are unreliable in today?s age where peoples mind are continuously open to doubt. Therefore, in conclusion the argument of existence of God, regarding religious experiences is very open to debate as the neither the strengths nor the weaknesses outweigh each other and the argument is again very open to personal interpretation, therefore it is widely agreed that the argument is different to each person regarding their beliefs and personal views. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God.

    4 star(s)

    In his book 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion' he considered the reasoning put forward by proponents of teleological arguments. His criticism is based on reason and logic and believed that order in the world does not demonstrate that it must have been put there by a divine intelligence.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Therefore, the cosmological argument begins by accepting the premise that all things are contingent. If all things are contingent, i.e., if all things can go out of existence and do not necessarily exist, then there must be a time where all things go out of existence.12 Aquinas appeals to the

  1. Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that ...

    Subsequently, Anselm made a quick rebuttal by stating that the analogies used by Guanilo bear no similarities to God and thus cannot withstand the argument. This is because the idea of an island is contingent and not necessary. This means that the island can always be improved or you can

  2. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    information about Socrates, mice or Jesus but to discuss the rules of logic. In order to test the validity of the arguments no mice need exist, and Socrates and Jesus need never have lived. A logically valid argument needs neither actually true premises nor an actually true conclusion, but if

  1. The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God. ...

    The third private religious experience is when an individual reflects upon their life and concludes that God was in fact guiding them. These categories agree with the above statement as they emphasise the fact that many people have religious experiences thus there is no real lack of evidence in this sense.

  2. Knowledge of God and/or ourselves can be transformed by religious experience Examine and comment ...

    He argues in his principle of credulity that we should accept what appears to be the case unless you have clear evidence to the contrary. This shows that we should just in what people are saying if you have no reason to believe they are lying.

  1. Explain what a study of Religious Experience may reveal about the nature of God. ...

    Joseph and St. John the Evangelist. After that, during the World War I, three children at Fatema, saw an apparition of the Virgin Mary. Since all three incidents were from catholic communities it is likely they heard of the apparitions of the religious experiences before them and therefore were copying their claims.

  2. Does Religious Experience offer a convincing argument for God

    This experience also offering a convincing argument for the existence of God as people may believe that these messages of wounds were personal messages from God to let people know he exists and that he is doing it for a specific reason.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work