• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and illustrate two weaknesses of the ontological argument.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain and illustrate two weaknesses of the ontological argument. The ontological argument was put forth by eleventh century monk and philosopher Anselm of Canterbury. It was written at first as a prayer to strengthen the faith of believers but has transformed over time into a substantial argument for the existence of God. However there are many weaknesses with the argument. Anselm uses existence as a predicate which was criticised substantially in later eras. Immanuel Kant claims that the way in which existence is being used in the Ontological argument is wrong. In his ?Critique of Pure Reason?, he claims ?Existence is obviously not a real predicate.? What he meant by this claim was that to use existence as a predicate of God didn?t actually tell us anything new about him. Like saying that a predicate of God is all-powerful tells us something which is useful and expands our concept of God in some way. When we add the predicate of existence to God is doesn?t actually augment our understanding of God. ...read more.


Gottlob Frege another modern philosopher agrees with Kant and Russell. As Frege argues that exists merely indicates that there are some things in this world which it corresponds to, like saying monkeys exists is just saying that there are certain things called monkeys which this concept corresponds to, this is not saying that monkeys have a distinct property called existence like they tails for example, which is a distinct predicate of a monkey. This is a major weakness in the Ontological argument, as it requires the use of existence as a predicate and a possible perfection however it has been criticised and has been shown to be an odd way and a wrong way of using existence as a predicate of not just God but anything. So Anselm is in fact using the word ?existence? in a wrong way in the first place. Without the use of existence as a predicate the Ontological argument fails, as that is one of its foundations. Another weakness of the Ontological argument is the fact that Anselm jumps from a definition to existence, he defines God into existence which ...read more.


At most we can infer from this is that if God was to exist in reality he must necessarily exist and not in any other manner. As Kant believed nothing in the realms of definition can reach out and tell us what must exist in reality as they are distinct forms. This disproves the claim that God must necessarily exist just from the definition. This is another substantial weakness in the Ontological argument, as what it does is jump from definition to reality which has been disproved as a plausible way of arguing and can be seen as absurd in a way, as it puts the cart before the horse, as the definition comes before existence here which is an unheard of and almost ridiculous way of defining things. The aforementioned weaknesses of the Ontological argument have a considerable impact on the credibility of the argument, as Anselm uses a strange type of argument, by defining things into existence, which was criticised heavily by Kant, and also his use of existence as a predicate is also criticised profoundly. These two form the basis for his argument but also seem to be major weaknesses in his argument. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    Anselm went on to prove that God must exist in reality too since he exists in our thoughts. Anselm used the analogy of how a painter imagines beforehand what he wants to paint. The painter has in his understanding what he has not yet made but does not yet understand that it is.

  2. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    Ontological argument do not offer proof for the non believer, they are left unconvinced - it was Kant who first coined the term ontological argument, as he saw Descartes formulation as making an invalid leap from the epistemological to the ontological, therein lies the problem for atheists - ontological arguments

  1. strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument

    Of course this is a ridiculous concept, Gaunilo said- just because we have the ability to conceive of this perfect island, it neither guarantees its existence, nor brings it into existence as an objective reality. However, Gaunilo's argument has a vital flaw: Anselm is not referring to an individual entity- e.g.

  2. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Anselm argues that God cannot exist in the understanding alone. The argument seems to proceed as follows. (1) Suppose (with the fool) that God exists in the understanding alone. (2) Given our definition, this means that a being than which none greater can be conceived exists in the understanding alone.

  1. Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that ...

    We can conclude that the greatest thing would be that God exists in BOTH mind and reality, thus, proving existence of God. In a reply to St Anselm's argument, philosopher Guanilo used the analogy of an Island. In this he states that: 'I can conceive of the most perfect island.'

  2. Explain the various forms of the ontological argument

    In summary, what Anselm is saying is that God can be proved to exist merely by analysing what it means to be God. Anselm developed a second form of this argument to show that God had a necessary existence, as it was impossible to think of him not existing, showing that God is eternal and has always been.

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    information about Socrates, mice or Jesus but to discuss the rules of logic. In order to test the validity of the arguments no mice need exist, and Socrates and Jesus need never have lived. A logically valid argument needs neither actually true premises nor an actually true conclusion, but if

  2. "The ontological argument is a poiri proof and as such can not inform us ...

    Plantinga also refute Gaunilo's claims because islands have no intrinsic maximum, they can always be improved or bettered. Immanuel Kant was the philosopher who called this argument the 'ontological argument. 'Ontos' means reality and Kant felt that the arguments jumped from ideas to reality without any real evidence or proof.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work