• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kants Moral argument for the existence of God [Part A question]

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Explain Kant?s Moral argument for the existence of God [Part A question] It is indeed Aquinas? fourth way which suggests: the existence of God can be revealed through human recognition of right and wrong. The German Philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) claimed that only one fact was indisputable, and that was the existence of a moral law, which was totally meaningless is God didn?t exist. Kant mentioned that he thinks it?s impossible to ?prove? the existence of God. However if you were to say that there is a God, then he MUST exist for our morality and that certainly justifies faith in God. There is a famous quote by Kant, which states: ?Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe?the starry heaven above me and the moral law within me?. ...read more.

Middle

For Newman, the existence of a conscience implies the existence of a moral law-giver to whom we answer to: God. His argument is as follows: everyone has an innate sense of moral awareness, enabling us to understand obligation and virtuous acts. For example, it doesn?t matter what culture or history or circumstance we are talking about; actions like murder or rape are always bad. This shows the existence of an ?objective moral law?. This of course follows his ?categorical imperative?, which states that there is an absolute and universal sense of moral duty within human beings which directs them towards the right actions. You make a moral decision based on a sense of duty, without any consideration or dependence on the outcome of that action. This leads us to the three postulates of morality, these are the factors involved when achieving the Summum Bonum. ...read more.

Conclusion

However we know from experience that this is not always the case. Clearly this is not achieved in this lifetime, therefore we must presume that there is an afterlife, of which provides humans the opportunity to have immortality. An ?average? level of virtue is not enough and we are obliged to aim for the highest standard possible. This however is only possible after a lifetime of fulfilling moral duties and we do not possess the power within ourselves to coincide both perfect happiness and moral perfection (achieve the Summum Bonum). Therefore to conclude, it is clear within Kant?s moral argument that God must exist as a postulate of practical reason. For without the existence of God, we cannot have the afterlife and we would not be able to fufil our obligation of reaching the summum bonum. Therefore God is necessary to ensure fairness in the universe and provide us with perfect happiness. For who else is omnipotent and omni-benevolent to do such deed? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    and temperance, and the follower of true glory; he needs no touch of the whip, but is guided by word and admonition only."9 Even more interesting is Plato's use of a human being in God's r�le. This gives two ideas; God is either being anthropomorphised (putting him in inferior standing)

  2. Explain what Kant meant by 'the Categorical Imperative'

    There would be no distinction between persons with regard to motivations, i.e. they would all be based on reason. Kant believes that once the passions have been removed from the motivation of action then an intelligible decision can be made which would be uniform for all.

  1. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    The fact that the two arguments can often be used to explain the same situation in completely different ways, and yet at the same time the arguments can almost be used to back up the opposing conclusion shows how similar, the assessments of conventional morality are, and yet also the huge difference the conclusions that arise from these assessments.

  2. Do you know you are reading this question?

    This is due to reliability not being the necessary case for justification as a justified belief may be caused by a notion what is unreliable. Ultimately, justification, reliabilism and foundationalism all fail due to a lack of certainty. To be able to know that I am reading the question I must take a different approach.

  1. Miracles part b

    Vardy explains this as "Hume was writing at a time when the only support for miracle stories came from word of mouth reports. Today claimed miracles are sometimes supported by scientific evidence." A famous example of this is Lourdes, where 68 miracle healings have been officially recognised by the Church.

  2. After the printing of the picture of the prophet of Islam, Mohammed, the moral ...

    He argued that he had a right to free speech and was not sorry for his comments. He called Islam a 'vicious, wicked faith'. Surely no one would rally against Christianity in this way. If they did this, they would be the scourge of the media and be given the heaviest punishment by the authorities.

  1. Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason

    He begins with saying ?A good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only though its willing, i.e., it is good in itself? (pg.

  2. Explain Freuds challenge to Kants moral argument for the existence of God

    This suggests that if parents have given low moral values, then the person will have a different idea to what the highest level of virtue is compared to somebody with high values of moral understanding. Kant called the ideal state where human virtue and happiness are united the ?Summum Bonum?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work