• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be either deontological or teleological, but cannot be both

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be either deontological or teleological, but cannot be both. To answer this question, this essay will firstly give a definition and brief explanation of what is meant by deontological and teleological. Secondly, I will describe how Christian ethics can be deontological and how they can be teleological, giving examples and using ethical theories, to illustrate each. Finally, I will try to give an idea about how a religious ethic can combine elements of a deontological with a teleological approach, including my own personal views of the argument. Deontological Ethics (from the Greek Deon, meaning obligation) is an ethical theory considered solely on duty and rights, where one has an unchanging moral obligation to abide by a set of defined principles. Thus, the ends of any action never justify the means in this ethical system. If someone were to do their moral duty, then it would not matter if it had negative consequences. When we follow our duty, we are behaving morally. When we fail to follow our duty, we are behaving immorally. Teleological moral systems are characterised primarily by a focus on the consequences which any action might have. Thus, in order to make correct moral choices, we have to have some understanding of what will result from our choices. When we make choices which result in the correct consequences, then we are acting morally; when we make choices which result in the incorrect consequences, then we are acting immorally. ...read more.

Middle

In the way that Kant's Categorical Imperative states that issues surrounding a problem should not be considered, Situation Ethics urges the moralist to take every issue into account. Furthermore, probably the main contrasting aspect of these two moral codes is their consideration for effects or results. Essentially, Situation Ethics is primarily concerned with the possible outcome of an action, in terms of whether it will create the most loving conclusion. Whereas a deontological approach dismisses worries about the possible outcome, stating that it is unnecessary and that the only thing that need be considered is an act's coherence to a pre-existing moral code. Situation Ethics would also appeal to Christians, more than Kant's theory would. Fletcher held that every ethical system requires a faith commitment, rather than Kant's fixation with deriving principles from reason alone. Fletcher's opinion that love is the only norm would also fit into a Christian's beliefs, rather than a theory that states you should act out of a personal sense of what you believe to be right. Situation Ethics also displays areas that appear to be more successful at tackling moral issues than a teleological approach. The main downfall with utilitarianism, a teleological theory, is similar to the deontological's, namely, its ability to neglect individualism. Although its simple rule "the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people" is similar to that of Situation Ethics, it still undervalues the impact of the individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

Paul Lehmann who is very much with Joseph Fletcher's situation ethics approach says, "Christian ethics is not concerned with the good, but what I, as a believer in Jesus Christ and as a member of his church, am to do. Christian ethics, in other words, is orientated toward revelation and not toward morality." Many believers would then do good actions with good outcomes in order to show their faith in the church and Jesus Christ. Whether Christian ethics is teleological or deontological can be debated. In either case, however, it is concerned with norms or standards. It is not interested simply in describing the patterns of people's actions, in analysing their moral beliefs, customs and practices. That is a function of the social sciences, which try to avoid making value judgements. They are not in the business of saying that this way of acting is good and that way is bad. The most that they will say is that this way of acting achieves certain results and that way of acting achieves other results. The essence of religious ethics, however, is the making of value judgements. Its nature is to be prescriptive rather than descriptive. It is to recommend a way of acting either for the achievement of certain desirable goals (teleological) or as a response to certain fundamental relationships (deontological). Christianity can therefore be approached from a deontological or teleological view point. As we can see not all Christians agree on all issues and the different denominations of Christians differ slightly on their judgements and values. Rosa Lenders ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. In this essay I will be looking at Ethics and the importance of using ...

    Our Options. * We report back to our supervisor, Because of your sexual attraction you cannot be totally objective in deciding the correct course of action. * Discuss the issue with the client, once this issue is brought into the clients awareness it could help the client move forward in their therapy.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    Preference utilitarianism is distinguished, as everyone's experience of satisfaction is unique, as we cannot decide what is good as it differs for different people. We could apply this with statistics to see who would approve of euthanasia, as everybody's opinion would be different.

  1. What is Christian ethics?

    In any situation people need to avoid subjectivism and individualism, and to use the moral rules of the community, but they should set these aside if love is better served by doing so, therefore being based on the Christian principle of agape - unconditional love.

  2. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Determinists state that people believe they are free only because they're ignorant of the causes of their actions. They make that point when they say that we are deceived in thinking ourselves free, a belief that consists of the causes by which they are determined.

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    doing so created even more good, their action would be judged as wrong by utilitarianism. Thus we can see, utilitarianism could be argued to be far too demanding of its upholders. Moreover, utilitarianism may not condemn actions which are generally considered immoral as long as they create more happiness than suffering.

  2. A) Clarify the key features of a deontological theory of ethics

    One must also as in a way that you always treat everybody as an end in themselves and not as a means to an end, you have no right to exploit or enslave anyone for any purpose. The final maxim is 'Act as if you were through your maxims a

  1. Medical Ethics And Organ Transplants

    However there is a problem in applying Quality of life to medical ethics as it is a teleological ethical theory ? from the Greek work telos meaning end or purpose and is consequentialist. It is difficult if not impossible to predict the consequences of an action and how they may ultimately affect the quality of life for a person.

  2. Identify the distinctive characteristics of situation ethics. ii.) Consider the view that situation ...

    Like Jesus on the Sabbath Day, Jesus also confronted the Pharisees over what the day was intended for. Jesus wanted people to follow the spirit in which God had given the law rather than following it to the letter and acting immorally in some cases.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work