• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Give an account of Kants Ethical Theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Give an account of Kant's Ethical Theory Kant was a philosopher born in the 16th Century. He developed a deontological, absolute and objective ethical theory focused on the idea of moral law. Kant's theory uses practical reason and looks at the argument before deciding what to do about the situation. It is described as being a priori and synthetic; this meaning it is knowable without experience and can be proven to be true or false without using experience. His theory basically explained that humans must do their duty, without having to reference it to experience. Kant believed in right and wrong based on reason, he relies on intuitions or facts. For Kant, practical reason looks at the evidence and the argument, he says it cannot depend on external facts. For freedom, Kant says you must be capable of exercising freedom or autonomy of will. For Kant's Ethical Theory, only good will counts, he believes it is the starting point for the whole of Ethics. ...read more.

Middle

Only good will can be unconditional love. So for his theory, we humans must do our duty, which makes the will good. He says that duty is done for its own sake and not for any kind of benefit to our self. Kant gives 3 different formulations of the basic moral principle. The first is acting as if you were legislating for everyone. This means that you should considerer whether the thing you want to do, could be made to be a universal principle applicable to all people at all times. Unless you can will that everyone should act this way, it is wrong. You must act as if your laying down a universal law of nature, imagine that your decision was one taken by God. It would affect everyone, so you should treat it as a law for everyone to follow not an exception for yourself. The second formulation, is act as if your treating people as a means and an end, never only as a means. ...read more.

Conclusion

With Kant, the value of the action comes before the action itself, and these rules apply to everyone. It is about duty, not feeling or inclinations and is therefore the equivalent to the golden rule, do unto others what you would have them do to you. With this theory it leaves no room for human rights to be exploited. However despite these strengths there are a number of weaknesses; this theory is about the abstract, and cannot be applied to moral situations. Thinking about the result of the action, is an important part of the decision making, so this is a weakness because you cannot always predict the result of your action. This theory also does not help understand the conflict between duties. In conclusion, I feel Kant's theory is a clear and well thought out one. Despite its flaws, I believe it is one of the easiest of theories to follow. I believe nobody can be an exception to it and that if everyone followed it, they would produce a world of equality and freedom. This would be a hard rule to enforce though, as some peoples idea of 'the right thing' could be the 'wrong' for others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The student includes a lot of descriptive points and shows a good familiarity with the terms involved in Kant's theory. These points typically get some of the gist of Kant's theory, though are often mistaken. Significant attempt at evaluation is made, though most of these attempts misfire and/or display a lack of understanding of Kant's theory. The student contradicts themselves quite frequently. Also these attempts at evaluation do not take the form of arguments, but often are just stated without explanation.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    We should prefer a higher qualitative pleasure than a lower pleasure even if it causes us unhappiness. Mill said, 'It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied'. Rule utilitarianism is another version of utilitarianism in which general rules are assessed for the happiness-making properties rather individual decisions.

  2. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    A material object, such as a basketball, has many properties: roundness, ballness, orangeness, elasticity, etc. These are all put together to make up this individual basketball. A form is just one of these properties, existing by itself apart from space and time.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    Another strength one may argue is that the system is useful for 21st century decision making, as we now consider life saving or life changing consequences more important than the act of playing God, due to secularisation in the 21st century.

  2. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    supported by observations from sense experience that go with what is probable. Eg the teleological argument has been criticised for its inability to verify the arguments convincingly from sense experience. However it may be argued that there are signs of design in the world but becomes a debate about what level of proof satisfies the weak verification criteria.

  1. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    He believed that we when we followed our conscience we were following some kind of divine law like a messenger from God. He believed that he could prove this when ?we feel responsibility, are ashamed, are frightened at transgressing the voice of conscience, this implies there is One to whom we are responsible.

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    ?you can now travel at the national speed limit?, they have no other effect. Symbols are powerful and they actually take part in the power and meaning of what they are symbolising. The cross is the symbol for Christianity. Not only is it a marker for that religion, but it also makes a powerful statement.

  1. Is Religious Language Meaningful?

    Therefore it is not subject to the Verification Principle. Ayer agreed that something could hold meaning for one person and not for another, simply due to differences in belief. R.M. Hare had similar ideas and said people have bliks about the world, these are personal to them. These beliefs are not based on logic or empirical evidence.

  2. Discuss the concept of Natural Law with reference to the ideas of Aristotle and ...

    However they were normally treated as absolutes. So, even though natural law has the potential for flexibility it is often interpreted rigidly. Natural moral law is concerned with both exterior and interior acts, also known as action and intention. Simply doing the right thing is not enough; to be truly moral ones intention must be right as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work