• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'God is omniscient so therefore we cannot have free will(TM) Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


'God is omniscient so therefore we cannot have free will' Discuss. The God of classical theism has many attributes including that of being omnipotent. By this we understand God to be all powerful and have no limits. This is that God is all powerful and have no limits. God is also regarded to be eternal in other words not affected by time and transcendent meaning God is above and beyond earthly existence. Further attributes of the God of classical theism are he is flawless as he is perfect and possesses the highest good and finite attributes and omniscience which means God has the ability to know everything. God being omniscient presents a dilemma that I will expand upon in this essay. The problem is that if God knows all things throughout time (as he must, if he is omniscient), then he knows every action I perform, every decision I make throughout my life, before make them. If God knows what I am going to do, then how can I do anything other than that? This raises the questions of whether we then are morally to blame for doing wrong actions or whether we were simply determined to do this action, if so there can be no sense of punishment or blame. This then implies that people such as Hitler cannot blamed for their actions because they were simply pre determined. ...read more.


Morality would be reduced to how well an action measured to our conditional preferences. Another approach towards the idea of freedom is Libertarianism. This is the view that we have complete responsibility for the actions we make as each of us are autonomous moral agents. Liberationists believe we have free will and determinism is incorrect. Jean Paul Sartre (1905- 1980) believed that freedom is the goal and measure of our lives. David Hume also argued that hard determinism commits a post hoc fallacy in saying that for example that as in nature event B consistently follows event A, this implies event A is the cause of event B. A counter view to both of the stances is the Compatablist approach which is to say that free will and determinism can both exist. Compatabilists believe our actions are determined but that we are still morally responsible. A possible answer to the dilemma of omniscience and free will. Libertarians believe we are free to choose from an open future, since the future has not yet happened it does not exist in reality. Something that does not exist cannot be known, only predicted. This is a limitation of time, not God. God has given us free choice so that we can chose our destiny even though he can predict what our destiny might be. ...read more.


Nobody knows which group they are in. People were to act good because it was a sign of the elect group and a person from the elect would want to be good. I am not able to reconcile the concept of a benevolent God with the idea that God would decide our fate before even knowing us. Moreover, it does not seem just that a moral person could end up in hell just because they were in the dammed group. I believe our future destiny should rely on our own free will and choice's in life, even if God already knows our destiny. In conclusion, I believe the best solution is that of the Libertarians that the future is not fact therefore God cannot know but predict. I do believe we are determined and can be manipulated but I still believe we have a sense of free will, When I make a decision I feel as though I'm making it for myself and even if this could be determined. I don't think it makes much of a difference in that I wanted to chose this decision either way. I don't think the dilemma here can ever be answered successfully as it seems the God's omniscience by definition is what changes. From God being all knowing to what God can know that is possible. God in the view of Anselm being 'the greatest possible being' to me should mean he is an eternalist and knows everything regardless of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God.

    This progresses to the want to abide the law and response to the obligation of duty. The third level is the post-conventional level as it is not reached by the majority of adults. It consists of understanding what everyone wants socially and a genuine concern for the welfare of others.

  2. Conscience is the voice of God - discuss

    Realising this, Aquinas tried to embellish his theory with the idea of 'Invincible Ignorance'. The idea is simple: if, Aquinas said, a man sleeps with another woman thinking that it is his wife, he has done everything to inform his conscience but has still accidentally committed a wrong act.

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    As previously mentioned, Nietzsche wants to use people who a free thinkers, someone that yearns to be 'set free from the crowd'. Plato agrees when Adeimantus says that 'people who study philosophy too long become weird, roguish creatures, useless to society' - philosophers aren't currently as useful to politics as they should be, according to both theories of authority.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    Therefore we are in a situation where we rely on these masters to survive, and so can easily be exploited for their benefit. This is essentially what business is, the exploitation of others for personal gain, and we are the exploited who are fooled into the belief that if we

  1. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    There have been some philosophers interested in religious language that have said that God can only be described in terms of what he is not. For example, "God is not the clouds". This is called the Principle of Negation. Marmiondes was a notable believer of this principle.

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    is but a poor reflection or image of the true spiritual world. The goal of the philosopher was therefore the elevation of consciousness, and the contemplation of these pure spiritual forms. Plato, like Descartes, saw the mind as identical with the soul.

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    In short, they think that God is a much more magnanimous being than they previously thought, and that denominations don?t count.'' - Dr. Raymond Moody, The Light Beyond. Many of these studies also had experienced the presence of such a God, or at least being in another realm.

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    The mover would be the power that created the first elements and condition that allowed for a single celled organism to develop. QUESTION 22: What does Sartre mean when he says that, in our case, ?existence precedes essence?, and what do the consequences he draw from this fact (forlorness, aguish, despair)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work