• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In your opinion, what should ethical debate really centre on?

Extracts from this document...


In your opinion, what should ethical debate really centre on? An ethical debate should focus on many different aspects of ethics. There are many types of ethics such as, Normative ethics, Meta-ethics and descriptive ethics. Ethics is concerned about what is right, about justice and how people should live. It studies the choices that people make and values and reasoning that lies behind them. All three types of ethics, normative, descriptive and meta ethics have different morals and belief; this essay will debate on them. A normative ethic, (this can also be called evaluative and substantive) is the term that is used to describe moral behaviour is different ways. They can go by the rule in which is the way a person lives their life. A normative ethic might help to make a moral judgment. There are many types of normative ethics which show a person how they should live there life, e.g. ...read more.


An example of a descriptive ethic is: 'If you are religious, you are less likely to have a divorce. ' This statement is a generalisation therefore is not true or false. It is based on ones opinion. The statement can be checked to be through statistics to be classified as true. The statement does not make any moral judgement to whether divorce is a bad thing or whether people should be religious or not. Meta-ethics is a way of looking beyond what a moral statement means. It analyses words and concepts used in the statement. The word 'META' comes from the word 'METAPHYSICS', this the division pf philosophy takes with the vital causes and messages behind things. Meta-ethics gives an outline and deeper meaning to the questions, what is ethics? The answer goes into further depth than normative or descriptive ethics would. A meta ethical statement would be: 'What does it mean to say that something is right or wrong? ...read more.


A Descriptive ethic is the description of the way people live their lives and the choices they make. A Meta-ethic is when looking further into depth about a moral statement and why it might be right or wrong, for example. I personally think that a descriptive ethic is the most logical ethic out of the three. This is because it says that people are free to believe what they want and this leaves no room for judgment or generalisation. Whereas normative says it's what people should believe due to society e.g. 'That abortion is wrong'. This how one feels due to the subject it should not be on what society tells you. Meta-ethics is also a very clear and good way of looking at ethics but it also can lead to more problems as one would look so in to depth about the moral that it may lead to other subjects and get confusing. So in my opinion Descriptive ethic is the clearest, simplest form or ethics while looking into morals. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain why there maybe problems about the meaning of ethical language

    meaning of ethical language are that the words used in ethical language are also used in everyday language, therefore people may misinterpret the meaning implied.

  2. Business Ethics

    Another scenario would be whereby a person in the marketing field decides to market his products knowing that it has defects. Would that make him unethical because all he wants to do is to make sure that the stocks purchased be sold in order to generate income?

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Unless one believes that decreased intelligence makes a person less human, sexual reproduction always produces children that are equally human and unique. Kass does not indicate that reproductive biotechnologies are immoral, he simply tries to reinforce the idea that cloning may take something away from the natural process.

  2. Capital Punishment

    "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."13 Peter has the power to 'bind and loose' which means to forgive and condemn the sins.

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    would treat yourself because you do in fact want other people to treat you in that way?'; a question sometimes raised in contention to the Golden Rule. Kant challenged the Golden Rule with the famous motto 'what if everyone did that?', believing that rational beings aim to act according to

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    So, expressing something as 'right' or 'wrong' is simply an expression or feeling. 'It denies that ethics is a genuine branch of knowledge or takes it to be a branch of knowledge only in a qualified sense. In either case, it denies that ethics is properly modeled on science or mathematics.

  1. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    Almost any religious response to abortion is directed towards the idea of 'the sanctity of life.' The sanctity of life position values life independently of its quality or condition. A person's health, happiness, comfort, convenience, financial interests, aesthetic enjoyment, moral convictions, and so on are all non-life values and so are not valued by the sanctity of life principle.

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    In the modern Roman Catholic Church, ensoulment occurs at the moment of conception. The embryo is not a person, but has the potential to become one. In 1987 Pope John Paul II said the observation of the physical state of the embryo was not sufficient enough to establish whether it is or isn?t a person.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work