• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Innate Knowledge

Extracts from this document...


Explain the significance of innate knowledge Innate ideas were defined by Locke as those which we are born with, an updated version put forward by rationalists (those who hold that synthetic a priori - knowledge that is learnt prior to experience and tells us something new about the world - can exist) is 'ideas which the content of which is not derived from experience'. Both definitions of innate idea, are however a priori (known prior to experience). Innate ideas were significant because for Plato, they proved that we could have true knowledge. He claimed that his 'Forms' were innate and this is how we come to know true knowledge. All universals (that is, particular things that have characteristics in common) ...read more.


and it's how we can come to have true knowledge. Innate knowledge is significant because for Plato it is how we come to know about the idea of 'equality'. Plato notes that the idea 'equality' could not have come from experience because nothing in experience is perfectly equal (in anything; matter, weight, length). So we must have an innate form of equality which we can relate back to see that things are unequal. The innate forms also had huge significance for Plato because they reinforced his idea that the soul was immortal. If we had not known the idea of 'equality' from experience then we must relate it to the ideal form. This means that it must have always been present ad infinitum, thus the form (which is present in the realm of souls) is immortal. ...read more.


Moving to the present day, we can see that innate ideas have huge significance for linguist Chomsky. He claimed that we had innate syntactical knowledge. His poverty stimulus argument can be summarised thus; children learn so little and such weak information regarding grammar that they shouldn't be able to have coherent grammar yet they do. This not only has huge significance in itself but it also shows that without these innate syntactical structures we wouldn't be able to communicate. In conclusion, we can see the significance of innate ideas because for Plato they provide a source for true knowledge, provide a solution to the problem of universals and also show that souls are immortal. Even for modern philosophers we see that innate ideas have huge significance, for Descartes God was innate. Chomsky also showed the significance of innate ideas by showing that without them, we could not communicate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods ...

    some treatment on some outcome), most social research involves both inductive and deductive reasoning processes at some time in the project. The two graphs above can be assembled into a single circular one that continually cycles from theories down to observations and back up to theories.

  2. How convincing is the view that we are born with at some innate ...

    However, rationalists claim that it is not necessarily the case. They believe that, in the case of language , a child requires the right kind of environment to allow his/her innate knowledge to come to fruition. Leibniz is essentially claiming that from birth you possess the ability to acquire knowledge and not that you are born with knowledge.

  1. Theory Of Knowledge essay

    test all particular phenomenons to the general law, leaving the possibility that there is one that does not conform. Therefore according to Hume, science cannot provide us with accurate knowledge and should not be given such a high status. Another criticism of the scientific method is that as science is

  2. Do humans have innate knowledge?

    may even identify them as two different substances, showing that we cannot trust our senses. However of course we do have to trust our senses to an extent as so we could acknowledge the transformation. Among the ideas Descartes took to be innate were the existence of the self, ?cogito

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work