• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Miracles are more of a Hindrance than a help to Religious Belief. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Miracles are more of a Hindrance than a help to Religious Belief. Discuss. Hume is viewed as the definitive spokesperson on miracles and his description of miracles, ?a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity?, is relevant as if we agree with this then immediately objections become obvious. The ?volition? of a deity to cause a statue to drink milk is questionable when millions live in poverty and millions die from AIDS, for example. The benevolence of an all powerful deity is not evident in a world where evil is certainly present through out concept of evil. However, believers may comeback to appeal to mystery or use the euthyphro dilemma, ?is what God does good, or does God only do what is good?, thus suggesting that pain and evil in the world are somehow beneficial. However, analyzing the problem of evil and God?s selection of when miracles should be performed the credibility of revelation has been questioned as it seems that whilst this does not prove God any less it leads to a God which is less desirable to believe in. ...read more.


Wyles also adds to this conversation as he brings up the question of why God created a world which would need to be intervened in if he is omnipotent. Therefore a belief in miracles and in God as benevolent and omnipotent seems to be inconsistent and religious belief struggles because of this. However, these issues concern philosophical principles and metaphysics whereas perhaps we should be more concerned with the actual experiences of miracles and their credibility. Hume uses his definition of miracles to come up with his system for assessing the credibility of claims, stating that it has to be more likely that the fundamental laws of physics are being broken than the person is mistaken or lying. For this he points to the witnesses having to be a completely neutral figures who are educated, not a women, not from a ?barbarous? nation etc. In fact he goes on to say that the chance of a testimony being fact could never outweigh the chance of the witness(es) being mistaken and the laws of nature being upheld. Therefore Hume?s objection lies in his belief in the concrete stature of the laws of nature, this is damaging to religious belief as it points out the fact that potentially science could explain every instance where a miracle has seemed to occur. ...read more.


However, although there then seems to be scope, using Swinburne and Ockham, to take experience seriously we have to look at this evidence and see that conflicting claims seem to conclude this subject with miracles as a hindrance to religious belief. As religious experience is a type of miracle the conflicting messages and different religions which these experiences come from seem to sully the reputation of miracles and therefore religion. Also miracles which cause or ask for the saving of human life conflict with those such as the story of Joshua which allows for murders to occur. Although mystery may still be alluded to as an explanation the conflicting nature of different miracles seems to discredit their influence upon religious belief. Aquinas classifies miracles as ?Those things?which are done by Divine power apart from the order generally followed in things?. Whilst this agrees with Hume?s definition that miracles are ?a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity?. However, Aquinas allows for the laws of physics to be maintained whilst miracles are occurring, for example, a loose bolt in a plane could be tightened without God having ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess Humes reasons for rejecting miracles

    people no longer rely on God for guidance therefore Hume presents a relevant argument rejecting miracles. Atkins supports Hume's argument that the typical educated person would not be inclined to report the occurrence of a miracle as they would know better.

  2. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    He observed that single experiences are what happens and when you have the experience it is a reality. He also rejected his earlier definition of weak verification as 'far too liberal, since it allows meaning to any statement whatsoever'. To solve the problem with strong and weak verification Ayer suggested directly and indirectly verifiable.

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    However, modern science has once again defeated this argument and shown how they serve other purposes. It seems that the argument was little more than unfounded opinion and guesswork. Rene Descartes is also greatly associated with dualistic arguments for life after death.

  2. 'A belief in the life after death solves the problem of evil' Discuss

    God cannot be blamed for created evil, since evil is not a substance but a deprivation, and it makes no sense to say that God created deprivation. John Hick would be an example of a soft materialist. He said that the soul and body are one.

  1. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    impossible for us to ever prove they exist; the laws of nature have been supported by billions of examples over a period of many hundreds of years, and so an apparent miracle would need to outweigh all the evidence needed to establish the original law.

  2. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    It provides rules that apply to all of us, that transcend any particular religion or culture and that can be accessed by all of us. Every adult has the right to become a parent. Discuss Becoming a parent is a major landmark in the lives of human beings.

  1. Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

    Yet the believer... insists that the gardener is invisible, has no scent and gives no sound. The sceptic doesn't agree, and asks how a so-called invisible, intangible, elusive gardener differs from an imaginary gardener or even no gardener at all"3 In what way can the believer profess to have 'experienced'

  2. Philosophers Views on Miracles Essay

    The witnesses of these events were unreliable and from barbarous nations. Peter Vardy questioned miracles on terms of moral grounds and he argued that a God who intervened at Lourdes to cure an old man of cancer but does not save the starving millions in Ethiopia needs to be questioned on moral grounds.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work