• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Moral Relativism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A) Explain the main characteristics of Moral Relativism. The theory of Moral Relativism suggests that no principle or value is completely right or wrong; it depends on the circumstances such as the particular society in which one lives in. This proves to be a problem when discovering the actual truth as people begin to think that the truth relies on who maintains it or that the only truth is their own. This can lead to truth having no significance because everything depends on the society to which one belongs to. This ideology originates from Ancient Greece at the time of Homer (8th century BCE). People within Greek society began to come across different ideas if what it meant to be moral. They questioned their own absolutist ideals, resulting in the discussions of the Sophists, a group of wise men, who disputed that all morality was relative - what was right and wrong was different within every society. A Greek philosopher, Protagoras proposes that people's main focus in life was to just get on with it; he says "Man is the measure of all things". ...read more.

Middle

Hobbes indicates that right or wrong is determined by the need for people to control their naturally selfish desires and to work for the interest and well-being of the group. He also points out that right and wrong are influenced by what is needed to minimise conflict and promote survival. John Leslie Mackie, an Australian philosopher wrote a book called "Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong". In his book, Mackie articulates that our moral beliefs do not shape the societies we live; rather our morality is shaped by society. He goes on to suggest that people want to believe morality has an objective truth, but that this is based on the psychological need to try and find an objective reality to base our views on and to give us confidence. However, there is no valid way of proving which moral view or belief is better as moral relativism requires us to be non-judgemental. Mackie concludes by saying that there is no real ultimate standard of right or wrong, which is a common relativist view. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another criticism suggests an important point, the Relativist approach is to accept and tolerate other people's intolerant system. Respecting other people's beliefs is difficult when they believe that the oppression of women is correct, for example. Some criticisms highlight that according to Relativists there is nothing wrong with slavery, torture or human sacrifice, if that is what a society practises then so be it. Additionally, Relativism gives little reason for behaving morally except to be socially accepted. There are several other flaws to the Relativist theory. For example, some statements are truly absolute, "It is wrong to torture innocent people". Just because cultures vary, it does not mean there is 'no' objective good. Along with this, ethical beliefs can change when they are challenged, primitive practises do discontinue. Moral relativism, because of its open-minded implications for ethics, is a matter of great importance; what we think about moral relativism matters. This is a situation where philosophy has a practical impact on society as a whole. It is important that the theory, and its consequences, are more widely understood in order to enforce true morality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the difference between moral relativism and cultural relativism

    A consequentialist approach to decision making is summed up by the phrase "the end justifies the means." In other words, a good result outweighs any harm that may be done in achieving that result. This is relative, as it doesn't take into account what is normally seen as moral and only whether the result is desirable.

  2. Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism

    This therefore justifies the need for laws, because it sets out brief parameters for the public to abide by. Moral relativism can be taken from a Christian perspective; an example of this is the applied theory of situation ethics.

  1. Ethical Criticism of McDonalds

    This treatment was not just reserved for chicken but also other animals involved in McDonald's fast food products. 40% of piglets were held in indoor breeding units, and half had tails docked for no apparent reason' (Inside the McLibel trial, 1995).

  2. Explain what is meant by 'moral relativism'

    It underlines how people's customs are different all over the world and we should respect this. For example; Men should take off their hats if they go into a church, whether they are Christian or not, and they should cover their heads in a synagogue, whether they are Jewish or not.

  1. Expalin the concept of Moral Relativism

    moral judgements and that one can perform any action as long as reason dictates to them that the action is for a good cause and that one has a proper motive in doing that action. It disagrees that the nature of an action is intrinsically right or wrong but that

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    are, what if God orders someone to do something that is wrong, for example, God says murder is wrong, and then commands Abraham to kill his son. This is the problem of Abhorrent Commands. As well as this, if anything that God says is right, then as the philosopher Leibniz

  1. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    If our moral rules work for us and theirs work for them, then there is nothing wrong with that. We can't judge them as being morally corrupt as their morals work for them. This leads us to be a more tolerant society.

  2. Explain Moral Relativism

    a crime in 36% of the worlds countries, Iran for example, which is heavily influenced by Sharia Law, gives homosexuals the choice to face capital punishment or undergo sex reassignment surgery, however shocking this is to western

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work