• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

Extracts from this document...


Discuss critically the view that we should always follow our conscience when making ethical decisions It has traditionally been proposed that the conscience is an established body of authority, essentially justifying the view that it should be 'followed'. Many notable figures throughout history - Aquinas, Butler, Plato, Freud - have structurally placed it in a potent r�le. Whether this is by means of tripartite analogies, hierarchical standing or even religious eminence, the conscience serves a theoretical, and indeed practical, function as the human and societal arbiter. But then, there is also a possible disparity between the states of individual and collective conscience, contributing to the difficulties in determining which conscience is more suited to enacting 'ethical decisions'. This predicates an interesting dichotomy: the conscience either does not maintain this degree of control or, conversely, the conscience's increased social standing grants it an even greater level of authority. It can similarly be questioned whether or not the conscience's proposed supremacy necessitates an individual's reliance on it, or even, whether it is needed at all. Ideas in connection with the conscience are far-reaching. The notion of 'ethical decisions' being governed by the conscience implies that there is a principal r�le the conscience must play in enacting them. But, as addressed above, there are solid questions over its reliability: its seemingly potent position and even its existence. My argument follows an objective line, paying close attention to that factor in which man is of sole importance. The human being is the entity the conscience must work alongside, and vice versa. There is a clear discrepancy between common definitions of 'consciousness', in turn emphasising the inconsistency of thought on the matter. The Collins Dictionary, for example, defines 'consciousness' as being "aware of one's surroundings"1; in contrast with the Concise Oxford Dictionary which classifies it as being "aware of and responding to one's surroundings"2. Herein, at the outset, lies an issue. ...read more.


These two examples demonstrate the conscience of the individual being mirrored in society. It raises issues as to whether the conscience of the collective should be 'followed' when making 'ethical decisions' as opposed to that of the limited individual; "only in the mind of the party, which is collective and immortal"16 - drawing distinctly Marxist parallels, and, perhaps more relevantly, conforming to the Thomistic precept of 'living in a society'. One can link this to the thoughts of Soloveychik; that "conscience can't be someone's own. Conscience is both personal and universal"17. The pluralism, 'we', established in the initial proposition is markedly addressed with these connections to societal conscience. One extremity that may arise from this elitist, authoritarian ideal, however, is the issue of mind-control ("Big Brother Is Watching You"). A conscientious hierarchical society controlling the psyche of the masses may fulfil the r�le of the individual in a more oblique, inflated manner. Appetites, affection and reason being governed by class structure; bringing about a socially solidified conscience. One might apply this to F.H. Bradley's personification: "our function [is] as an organ" in a "social organism". Thus, if conscience is uniform among individuals, why might 'ethical decisions' not be carried out similarly? Baruch Spinoza believed that God's knowledge is distilled through humanity: "an idea is adequate and perfect insofar as it represents knowledge of the eternal and infinite essence of God"18. Giving further substance to the idea of an individual's morals (their 'ethical' make-up) being reflected on a collective level. Hume, however, argues against this, "nothing is more surprising than the easiness with which the many are governed by the few"19, pondering the dominance of a reasoned minority - the collective's core conscience - in turn eradicating the starting point for this theory. An answer to the issue in the proposition, however, is still not possible at this point. One cannot yet determine whether the conscience should be 'followed' when making 'ethical decisions' because of the sheer amount of subjectivity over the ethics of elitism. ...read more.


Indeed, there is a danger that reliance on appetites would encourage societal and individual regression. Hence, a viable alternative must be suggested. For me, this comes in the form of Social Darwinism ('survival of the fittest'); that mankind evolves by means of competition, "the very essence of instinct is that it's followed independently of reason"28. Darwin appeared to prioritise appetites; using them as a means for societal progression. One might assert that this ideal comes closest to loosening the fetters of both individual conscience and societal restraint, whilst not jeopardising our future. In answering the question, the various examples presented in this essay - of the conscience being dominant in its essence - suggest to me that in any case the conscience deters our 'decision'-making. Indeed, if we feel by any means constrained we are unable to make pure, objective 'ethical decisions', ergo, we should not be subservient to the conscience when making them. 1 Collins Dictionary & Thesaurus: Two books in one, 2004 2 Concise Oxford Dictionary: Tenth Edition, 1999 3 1 Thessalonians 5:23 4 Richard D. Patterson, The Third Day Motif, The Use Of Three In The Bible 5 The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 6 Joseph Butler. Class notes. 7 This is addressed further with the issue of guilt later on. 8 Plato, The Republic 9 Plato, Phaedrus 10 This is intended to mean the essence of God, rather than merely 'god-like' attributes. 11 Pope's Letter On Newman 12 David Hume 13 Sir Francis Bacon 14 Joseph Butler 15 Nineteen Eighty-Four, Part 2, Chapter 2 16 Nineteen Eighty-Four, Part 2, Chapter 2 17 Simon Soloveychik, Free Man 18 Spinoza's Ethics 19 David Hume 20 John B. Watson 21 Sigmund Freud 22 Sigmund Freud 23 Fourth Lateran Council 24 Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment, Chapter 19 25 Hamlet, Act 3 Scene 3, l. 40 26 Jewish commentary 27 Jean-Paul Sartre 28 Charles Darwin ?? ?? ?? ?? 3,143 words (2,707 w/o quotations), candidate number 5635 Centre number 67213 iv ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare, contrast and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relationship between individual and society

    The people are ignorant and do not possess the knowledge that they deserve. The prisoners are bound and only have a view of the wall in front of them, there is a fire behind them, between them and the wall is nothing.

  2. Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God.

    and wrong which is God given and conscienta which is our application of synderisis to moral situations. So for Aquinas conscience is the act of applying our God given knowledge of right and wrong (natural law theory) to what we do.

  1. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    Marx and Engels on the other hand work the other way around placing the starting point for freedom in the society and then moving back to the individual. The greatest difference between the two theories is their position on materialism.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    manager vs. worker, teacher vs. pupil, politicians, preachers and even in the sex act itself. But, for Nietzsche, political and social tyranny seeks to tame this primeval drive and to suppress it. It is the weak and the herd who let their desires and will be suppressed.

  1. We have consented to be governed so we are obliged to obey the government ...

    If people refuse to live under a non-anarchist rule then they should emigrate. A third argument on the discussion could be that people are given the option to be under government control. This argument is an explicit one. To achieve this, a lot would have to change in our current

  2. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    If it were that conscience was the voice of God, then it would be far too easy to blame atrocities on God and say that every person on earth that has committed a bad act has done it because ?God told them to?.

  1. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    Explain why you do, or don't, find his reaction justified? Tolstoy 1. Assumed there was a simple answer to the question: what is the meaning of life? 2. Plagued by questions relating to 'the point' of most of his actions and accomplishments.

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    They did not choose their consciousness to be like that as they have limited control over it as opposed to those who have near full control, yet do the wrong actions while knowing that it is not right. So those whose consciousness is willingly lowered can be considered less of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work