• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Telelogical Argument Strengths

Extracts from this document...


Is the Teleological Argument strong? The Teleological Argument is an a posterior inductive argument which was put forward in many forms by ancient philosophers such as Plato and Cicero to the more modern philosophers and theologians such as Aquinas and Paley. It is an argument to prove the existence of God. The name of the argument comes from Greek "telos" which means purpose or aim. Aquinas's argument which was in his Summa may be summed up in this way: 1. All designed things have a designer 2. The Universe is designed 3. Therefore it has a designer, this designer is God This argument, as seen from point one and three, is begging the question (in other words, it is a circular argument). This makes it weak because it has already asserted one of it's premises in the conclusion. It as though he is saying that "it's true because it is true". ...read more.


So, the fact that it is not necessarily true does weaken the argument. The argument is also a posterior, this gives room for Scepticism (which doubts the external world) to weaken the argument. Scepticism says that we can never have knowledge of the external world which means the 'order' or 'purpose' we see in the world can also be doubted. As Descartes put it, the only thing that is infallible was your own mind (this clearly illustrated when he said "I think therefore I am"). How do we know that order, purpose and beauty in the world isn't the working of an Evil Demon? David Hume, the British Empiricist, raised objections to the teleological argument which was put forward by Paley however his objections can be used against Aquinas's argument too. Hume's first objection was that we can not assess whether a universe was designed because we have no experience of universe being designed or built. ...read more.


His second objection, which was combated by Swinburne, can not possibly be true because the order the universe has In conclusion, the Teleological Argument is strong because the first two objections that were put forward by Hume have been combated by Swinburne and do not hold up. However, Hume's third objection still holds, this makes the argument weaker because it shows that the argument does not fulfil its purpose (to show God's existence - the definition being of a Judeo-Christian God). The objection that it is an inductive, argument does not hold because although it makes it less likely to be true, that does not mean that is not true. Also, the fact that it is a posterior, may mean that scepticism can doubt it but the common sense approach (put forward by Wittgenstein) says that we should not be affected by such things. Wittgenstein says "Here is one hand, and here is another" and that is proof enough. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    John Stewart Mill (1806-1873) shared similar views to Albert Camus (1917-1960) in challenging the teleological argument, and almost a centenary later, at the time of Camus' work, Mill's views were still valid. Although the teleological argument may lead to the idea of a God and creator, it does not point to the Christian concept of God.

  2. Critically assess the design argument

    On the other hand Darwin alleges that cause and effect only appears as a theory because the world has evolved and created this impression.

  1. Jesus And Women

    He showed her grace and represented his attitude as a teacher. He was trying to demonstrate the difference between law and grace. None of us are "without sin," therefore all of us are in need of God's grace to escape God's perfect and holy judgment.

  2. Mills objection to the teleological argument is stronger than the objections of Hume. Discuss.

    We only have experience of the things that we have designed and created, not natural things such as mountains or valleys. We know that houses require a designer because we have experience of many houses being built but we have never observed a universe being created.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work