• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism is a useful method of making moral decisions. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Utilitarianism is a useful method of making moral decisions." Discuss. It is logical to agree that utilitarianism is a useful method for making moral decisions for many reasons. Firstly, Utilitarianism is useful as it is a teleological ethic, so there are no exact rules. Humans naturally base their actions on what the consequences will be, so it is easy to adhere to this kind of ethics. Moreover, considering the results seems warmer and personal, as deontological arguments can be cold and rigid (e.g. ...read more.

Middle

In contrast, Utilitarianism is a useful method for making moral decisions as it is applicable to all religions, cultures and beliefs, as all people believe that happiness should be aimed for and pain should be avoided. Furthermore, there is no need for extra knowledge or special wisdom as it is based on common sense and reason, which almost everyone else can do. It also treats everyone as equal, there are no special considerations. As it is worldwide, its usefulness is increased as it isn't exclusive and can be applied by everyone. ...read more.

Conclusion

It leaves no room for individual tastes, or for some people to value highly something that others might think is of no account at all. Lastly, another benefit of Utilitarianism when considering moral decisions is that At times utilitarianism advocates self-sacrifice, honesty and justice - all things that we value in moral terms. It tends to adhere to worldwide ideas on morality. However, it makes people do the right things for the wrong reasons. Furthermore, It treats people as means to an end, which the philosopher Kant was wholly against. In conclusion, I believe that Utilitarianism is a useful method for decision making, as it allows people to have balanced democratic morality that promoted general happiness in society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    He was born in London and lived at a time of great scientific and social change. With revolutions in France and America, demands were being made for human rights and greater democracy. Bentham worked on legal reform and wrote The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789), in which he put forward his ethical theory.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    The difference clearly lies in the differences in opinion that the two philosophers held before making their assessments, their prejudices as Nietzsche would put it. In addition we have seen that even in today's society, which would usually be regarded far more utilitarian than Nietzschian, the argument can be made the other way.

  1. Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods ...

    It must be rejectable. There must be a way to test the possible answer to try to make it fail. If you design an untestable hypothesis, then science cannot be used to help you decide if it is right or not. For example: you hypothesis that 'God is awake'.

  2. Critically discuss utilitarianism

    A person has been told to tell a lie to his friend. An act utilitarian would think about the utility maximised if he told the lie compared to if he didn't however, the rule utilitarian would follow the rule which has the greatest utility.

  1. After the printing of the picture of the prophet of Islam, Mohammed, the moral ...

    If it were to be in the Guardian it wouldn't ruffle any feathers as it would be in keeping with other editorials that have been published in the same paper.

  2. Discuss the usefulness of studying philiosophy.

    not know.2" However, these definitions are often too vague and somewhat inaccurate. Instead, I feel that a more appropriate definition would be as follows: Philosophy is a discipline or field of study involving the investigation, analysis, and development of ideas at a general, abstract, or fundamental level.

  1. Why are justice and integrity problematic for utilitarianism?

    This seems a contradiction in terms. It is for this reason, therefore, which I believe that utilitarianism cannot be considered a realistic principle of morality, when faced with individual integrity and the use of individual experience during the decision making process.

  2. 'It pays to be moral.' Discuss. (30)

    They claim there is a host of evidence supporting altruistic actions that cannot be said to engage the self-interest of the agent however psychological egoists may claim that the ultimate motives of acts can never be completely altruistic and always have a self-interested component, e.g.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work