• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism is a useful method of making moral decisions. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Utilitarianism is a useful method of making moral decisions." Discuss. It is logical to agree that utilitarianism is a useful method for making moral decisions for many reasons. Firstly, Utilitarianism is useful as it is a teleological ethic, so there are no exact rules. Humans naturally base their actions on what the consequences will be, so it is easy to adhere to this kind of ethics. Moreover, considering the results seems warmer and personal, as deontological arguments can be cold and rigid (e.g. ...read more.

Middle

In contrast, Utilitarianism is a useful method for making moral decisions as it is applicable to all religions, cultures and beliefs, as all people believe that happiness should be aimed for and pain should be avoided. Furthermore, there is no need for extra knowledge or special wisdom as it is based on common sense and reason, which almost everyone else can do. It also treats everyone as equal, there are no special considerations. As it is worldwide, its usefulness is increased as it isn't exclusive and can be applied by everyone. ...read more.

Conclusion

It leaves no room for individual tastes, or for some people to value highly something that others might think is of no account at all. Lastly, another benefit of Utilitarianism when considering moral decisions is that At times utilitarianism advocates self-sacrifice, honesty and justice - all things that we value in moral terms. It tends to adhere to worldwide ideas on morality. However, it makes people do the right things for the wrong reasons. Furthermore, It treats people as means to an end, which the philosopher Kant was wholly against. In conclusion, I believe that Utilitarianism is a useful method for decision making, as it allows people to have balanced democratic morality that promoted general happiness in society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Natural law is the most reliable approach when making judgements about sex and relationships. ...

    the like natural law this is also for many a negative point of natural law. As it means that natural law is inflexible, and hence some might argue that natural law being inflexible means that it is not the best approach to use, especially in this situation when we are dealing with a the sensitive topic of sex and relationships.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    This further illustrates the fact that they share a lot of common interests. The reason for this is that the two systems need not be mutually exclusive, they are in fact just different perspectives of the same assessment of the problems with traditional moral practices.

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    keep them enslaved, because of the benefits that this would give to the majority. Act utilitarianism, therefore, moves from specific cases to general principles whilst rule utilitarianism moves in the opposite direction and it was Jeremy Bentham who first fully articulated the theory of utilitarianism.

  2. There are many arguments for and against Utilitarianism and whether it provides an adequate ...

    First of all how can one measure happiness and decide which action would result in the greatest happiness for everyone involved? Then there is the question of scope. How far does someone look in deciding who is involved and who would be affected by the action?

  1. 'It pays to be moral.' Discuss. (30)

    They claim there is a host of evidence supporting altruistic actions that cannot be said to engage the self-interest of the agent however psychological egoists may claim that the ultimate motives of acts can never be completely altruistic and always have a self-interested component, e.g.

  2. Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods ...

    It must be rejectable. There must be a way to test the possible answer to try to make it fail. If you design an untestable hypothesis, then science cannot be used to help you decide if it is right or not. For example: you hypothesis that 'God is awake'.

  1. Discuss the usefulness of studying philiosophy.

    Firstly, let us define the term 'Philosophy'. In layman terms, Philosophy is often defined as the "love of wisdom", and is the transliteration of the Greek words philos and sohpia1. Another possible definition comparing the fields of science and Philosophy would be that "Science is what you more or less know, and philosophy is what you do

  2. Critically discuss utilitarianism

    dialysis machines, heart donors etc. The patient with the highest number of worthwhile years left with the treatment would expect the treatment but there is a problem in this concept about whether the patient's consequences should be considered or also the effect on families involved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work