• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection "The latter end of [this] commonwealth forgets the beginning." William Shakespeare, The Tempest From Plato's The Republic to Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto, the search for a perfect social state has never stopped; its ultimate goal of achieving a human society that exists in absolute harmony with all due social justice, however, has proved to be woefully elusive. The pure concept of a utopia can be theoretically visualized as a perfect geometric circle: one that is seamless, all-inclusive, yet impossible to draw out in reality. In 1516, Sir Thomas More depicted in his famed Utopia what he envisioned to be an ideal state, one that frees its citizens from material worries by mandating economical equality amongst them and dividing social responsibilities impartially. More's work, however brilliant, cannot conceal the serious fallibilities and troublesome limitations of the utopian thoughts; and being the ambivalent creator that he was, More consciously emphasized the paradoxical nature of his ideal society. A century later, in his last work The Tempest, the great playwright William Shakespeare presented his audience with a mystical Commonwealth that is a reflection of the Golden Age from the classical literature. This fantasy, wrapped in the larger still whimsy that is The Tempest, will have the human race return to the purest state of nature. ...read more.

Middle

Gonzalo's speech calls for a revival of the Golden Age that is first depicted in Ovid's Metamorphoses: "All things in common nature should produce / Without sweat or endeavor? but nature should bring forth / Of its own kind all foison, all abundance / to feed my innocent people" (Shakespeare 135-136) The fantasy of a bountiful nature that spares humankind the need to till the earth is not an uncommon one, nor is the total rejection of the idea of human government. When compared with Utopia, what is noteworthy about Gonzalo's speech is its evident anti-intellectualism and the glaring contradiction in its supposed order of governance. Contrary to More's belief that a perfect world must be human made through painstaking organization and even manipulation, in The Tempest the utopia is to be produced by nature alone. In fact, according to Gonzalo, the creations of human civilization such as trades, arts, and social institutions all but tarnish the pristine condition of the Golden Age. The human intellectual tradition, arguably the only realistic hope for achieving a near-perfect society, becomes the very scapegoat for its absence. Whereas More put his faith in men and the possibility of a flawless system designed much like a bee hive, Shakespeare's Gonzalo cannot envision an artificial Eden. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both models, however, are flawed in essence. If one is to accept the possibility of a utopian state, then he must embrace the belief that men are inherently good, or at least can be made to observe good rules without fail. In the Golden Age this was, we are told, the reality: "No law or force was needed; men did right freely without law or judge all men were safe" (Ovid 89). Yet in a society such as Utopia, "good" is in a sense merely what the law dictates and the majority agree to; while in The Tempest, "good" is understood to be "innocent" which is by definition without knowing the distinction between good and evil. At the heart of a social system's imperfections are the defects and weaknesses of human nature. After all, separate individuals are the atomic components of an inclusive society that is the sum of all their virtues and faults. The utopian philosophy falters because it refuses to address the darker side of the fundamentals of human nature the foremost of which is greed and malice. It needs to be remembered that human evils breed oppressive systems, not vice versa. By revolutionizing the societal system into a form that is supposedly just, one does not redeem nor remedy the intrinsic moral defects of its citizens. The Utopian philosophy remains, after all the pursuits, a hollow icon on the altar of aspiration. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    (I read that Sartre said that when France was under Nazi occupation the people were the most free. I think I will add this in but first I need to read further in to the point and actually understand what he means).

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    harm principle as they may well harm themselves unintentionally; such children and those who cannot take care of themselves do not, and cannot, have sovereignty over self. Applying Mill's Harm Principle strictly to current law would therefore remove "paternalistic" laws.

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    The Forms are like a religion, which makes Plato's system almost a theocracy (unlike the authority of Nietzsche) - and this has been implemented as a political system before. In the past, however, people have become dissatisfied with the religion that they are 'forced' to agree with.

  2. Ensayo de teoria de conocimiento

    Hay varios inventos que han cambiado completamente el mundo como la rueda, el fuego, entre otros. Del mismo modo que la gente se empieza a pensar, "Nos estamos quedando sin cosas que inventar" o "Todo lo que pod´┐Ża ser inventado ya ha sido inventado".

  1. The Rebirth of Dialogue: Bakhtin, Socrates, and the Rhetorical Tradition by James P. Zappen. ...

    The thrust of Zappen's argument in these first three chapters is that Socrates embodies aspects of Bakhtin's concept of dialogue and that Plato, as the author of Socratic dialogues, prefigures the work of the polyphonic novelist. The essential foundation for these claims is that Bakhtin himself engaged the work of Plato in his Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics.

  2. Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Be Opened to Oil Drilling?

    (Lovins, 130) The refuge is "unlikely to hold economically recoverable oil." (Lovins, 129) The notion that technological advances in finding and extracting oil can still make refuge oil profitable, as it could "make extracting refuge oil cheaper - but those same advances would also cut costs everywhere else...

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    > Deduction was the method of the sophists. This means that truth is relative and from this they developed a system. > The father of classical philosophy. > Insisted & defended objective truth and philosophy and said that there is truth so he contrasted the Sophists. > He said that the true key to wisdom is by saying that you do not know .

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    The way a man chooses to act implies what actions others can take 3. When we realize we have this responsibility we feel anguish 4.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work