• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Whilst Deontology has its attractions it fails to provide a reliable foundation for moral decision making Examine and evaluate this claim

Extracts from this document...


Deontology 'Whilst Deontology has it's attractions it fails to provide a reliable foundation for moral decision making' Examine and evaluate this claim (30) Deontology is based upon the actions of a person, not the consequences. The word deontology is derived from the Greek word 'deontos'. It was developed by Immanuel Kant and it is an absolutist a priori theory, the phrase a priori means it is knowable through experience and absolutist means there are fixed rules that cannot be changed. This means Kant believed the duty of the moral law was unchangeable and through experience, if everyone followed these rules the world would be a better place. Immanuel Kant wrote 'Critique of Pure reason' in this book he devised his deontological theory of duty. He believed it is the duty of one to follow the moral law and not judge situations with feelings, inclination, love and compassion. Kant also believed that all humans seek for summum bonum which is the state when all human virtue and happiness are united. To help people on their way to moral decision Immanuel Kant devised the categorical imperative, this is in contrast to the hypothetical imperative. ...read more.


WD Ross devised the notion of prima facie duties, this means first appearance. This is when we follow our duty unless there is an overriding obligation, e.g. telling a white lie to make someone feel good about them self. This goes against the principle of duty as you must not lie but you could argue that you will feel morally good about yourself if you make another person feel good. Therefore this does not help is moral decision making as you have conflicting duties. Strength to this theory is that justice is always the absolute. This means only intrinsically right actions are accounted for. This can be seen with Kant's statement of good will. 'it is impossible to conceive of anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which can be taken as good without qualification, except good will.' This shows that only good will is the only good we can achieve from the world. By justice being an absolute it means that you cannot justify immoral actions. This is attractive because it shows that by following this theory you will not act unmorally and you will be able to reach that summum bonum as you are fulfilled with good deeds. ...read more.


Again this is wrong because who is to say one right action is another person's right action, this makes it very unreliable with moral decision making. However if you take into account what the majority feel is wrong or right you could come to a conclusion on universal rules. This can be seen with rules such as 'do not commit murder' as most people do not tolerate that and it is safe to say they do not agree with it. Finally another weakness is that Immanuel Kant starts to argue now 'is' to be done but what 'ought' to be done, this is known as the Naturalistic Fallacy. This is a weakness because it makes people feel as he is in control and he is telling what should and shouldn't be done. This is a weakness because Kant has different agreement on morals to another agreement, again he is assuming the masses will agree with this method making unreliable. By Kant saying what ought to be done he is showing what he feels is intrinsically good and that may vary from another. On the other hand by Kant saying he ought instead of is, it shows he is laying down ground rules and some people may like this as they will have rules to follow making it a attractive and reliable moral decision making theory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Compare Utilitarianism With Kant's Theory of The Categorical Imperative And Explain Which You Think ...

    Also, in order to make a moral decision, one must have a choice, so, if one cannot make a choice, then they do not need to make a morally correct decision. An example of this is, if you are tied up and are watching your friend being beaten up, and

  2. Analyse and explain the strengths and weaknesses of deontology

    If a maxim cannot be rationally universalised, it is intrinsically wrong and whatever the supposed pragmatic values of such an action in a certain situation, it is ethically impermissible. It is a person's duty to always follow the categorical imperative.

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is the voice of God

    He had two views of the conscience. His first, was that guilty consciences were the result of displeasing those in authority therefore we fear some sort of rejection from them and the influence that this has over us is what Fromm called the authoritarian conscience.

  2. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    His views on purpose are limited and could be completely different to what he considers- all in all why does he hypothesize what our purposes is. When looking at the strengths of the natural law approach one finds that they seem to be born from the limitations of the weaknesses.

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    Modern culture can and indeed is labeled 'greedy' and 'thoughtless'. In my twenty plus years in the business world, I have encountered many of these types of people. Ethical behavior is one of the most discussed topics in the business world today.

  2. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    Freud, in answer to this essay question, would say that the conscience is completely unreliable, unless you simply wish to rely on it as a barometer of social acceptability. If your view of ethics is restricted to what is inoffensive to people at large, and your parents in particular, then yes, the Super-Ego is a reliable agent of ethical decision-making.

  1. Situation Ethics and Moral Decision Making.

    The first principle is pragmatism, which means a theory must be practical and fulfil its purpose. Following this, there is the previously discussed relativism.

  2. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    It attempts to establish a law which can be accessed by all and was the foundation for human rights. Many find it an attractive in a relativist era suffering a breakdown of traditional social structures and moral certainty. However in a modern society where many people are no longer religious

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work