• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Grazing cattle is less efficient than growing crops, discuss this point.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Grazing cattle is less efficient than growing crops, discuss this point. "The beef in just one Big Mac represents enough wheat to make five loaves of bread." This just shows that growing wheat is more efficient than grazing cattle as the five loaves lasts, on average for a family of four, about three weeks whereas a Big Mac only lasts one person a matter of ten minutes, if that! In this essay I am going to discuss whether or not grazing cattle is less efficient than growing crops. There are many perspectives to this argument. From a biologists point of view, plant foods are far more energy efficient than animal products because when you eat meat, a vast amount of energy is lost through the food chains, whereas when you eat plant foods such as wheat, no energy is previously lost because plants are the producers of the food chains. ...read more.

Middle

Another point of view of vegetarians and animal rights supporters is that grazing cattle just for food is inhumane as the animals then have to be killed. Vegetarians also are concerned with the matter of space, "It takes ten times as much land to maintain a carnivorous diet than to support a vegetarian one." On a farmer's perspective, they could argue on both sides; crops are less expensive to grow and growing them is more space efficient than grazing cattle, however grazing cattle is less work for the farmers. A cow grazing in one acre of land produces enough meat to sustain a person for two and a half months; however soybeans grown on that same one acre would nourish a person for seven years. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, as over half the population do not eat much wheat, soybeans or corn, it would be pointless to cut down the amount of cattle being raised. On the other hand, the amount of grain that is needed to end extreme hunger is 40 million tonnes and the amount of grain fed to the animals in the West is 540 million tonnes, so therefore, reducing the amount of cattle being bred would put a stop to human starvation and hunger. In my personal opinion, I agree that the statement is debatable. I agree that in an ideal world animals would not be slaughtered purely for food, however, because meat is easily digestible, it is an easy way for us to get the energy we need. Humans, unlike cows, do not have four stomachs so would find it incredibly difficult to, for instance, digest grass, which is the producer of the energy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Energy, Respiration & the Environment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Energy, Respiration & the Environment essays

  1. Field trip report Mangrove ecosystem

    Prop roots can be found in both Aegiceras corniculatum and Kandelia candel. > Another root system is cable roots. Cable roots spread horizontally and laterally just below the soil surface and spread widely. So the plants can anchor the soil firmly in a larger surface area.

  2. chemistry of renewable resources

    growing crops as the worlds population is expanding * Food crops are susceptible to pests and diseases and weather conditions * Bulk makes transporting the foodstuff difficult to one place to the other especially if it grown abroad * Large land areas need to be devoted for growing food crops

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work