• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this experiment, I predict that as the force increases, as will the acceleration. Therefore, as the force decreases the acceleration decreases.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Science Coursework : Physics

Prediction:

In this experiment, I predict that as the force increases, as will the acceleration. Therefore, as the force decreases the acceleration decreases. I can also predict that the force and acceleration of an object are directly proportional, meaning that if the force was to be doubled, then the acceleration would also double. I can predict this using Newton’s second law of motion.

Newton’s second Law of motion:

Force      =         Mass x Acceleration

  (N)                    (kg)         m/s

(variable)                      (measurement)

In simple terms, this means that if the force is to increase then the acceleration must also increase because the mass multiplied by the acceleration must equal the force.

The equation, like many others can be re-arranged in order to show a possible prediction for the value in m/s  that the acceleration will be the subject of the equation.

Acceleration     =    Force          (Mass / 0.400kg)

                                Mass

Weight is a force. Weight is quite oftenly confused with mass, however each one differs to the other. Mass is measured in kilograms (kg). The weight of an object only concerns the amount of matter an object is made up of.

...read more.

Middle

The experiment will be measured on 3 occasions for each variable, these repeat readings will be averaged out into a single figure to gain an accurate set of results.

To prepare for the investigation, a preliminary test was carried out in order to discover which mass of the rider produced the most accurate results.

To do this, the lightest mass of the rider was used with the lightest and heaviest weights (0.020N - lightest) and (0.170N - heaviest).

The masses of the rider were the largest possible (0.400 kg) and the smallest possible ( 0.200kg).

The results showed me that the lighter the mass of the rider, the wider the range of results that I recorded. In contrast, the heavier the mass of the rider was, the more reliable my results were because they provided the smallest range.

...read more.

Conclusion

I was able to produce these predictions by re-arranging Newton’s second law to show me what the acceleration of an object can b equal to in terms of its force and mass.

(Old equation)

   Force      =         Mass x Acceleration

    (N)                    (kg)         m/s

(variable)                        (measurement)

(New, Re-arranged equation)

Acceleration     =    Force          (mass / 0.400kg)

                                Mass

I have a range of values for my force,  I inputted each one of these values to gain predicted results.

(When force = 0.02) :    0.02           =        0.05       (Actual average = 0.05)            

                                     0.400    

(When force = 0.03) :   0.03            =        0.075     (Actual average = 0.07)

                                     0.400

(When force = 0.07) :   0.07            =        0.175     (Actual average = 0.08)

                                     0.400

(When force = 0.08) :   0.08            =        0.20       (Actual average = 0.20)

                                     0.400  

(When force = 0.12) :   0.12            =        0.30       (Actual average = 0.31)

                                     0.400

As the above figures  display clearly, my results are all highly accurate and sufficiently support my prediction and theory.

All that remains is to discuss how I can extend my investigation. The obvious point that springs to mind is to gather further results to obtain an exceptionally high level of accuracy. However, I can also look to change my variable from the force to the mass of the rider. I can do this by investigating the relationship between the mass and force on a rider to give me additional information.

I can carry out these tests in the same manner as I have discussed for this particular investigation, but changing the variables used. I will use a range of variables that will aid me complete my investigation reaching sufficient conclusions.  

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Catapult Investigation

    3 star(s)

    Obviously if we repeated the investigation again then we would not get the exact same results as we were not a precise in many cases as we could have been, but if repeated I am sure that the results would follow the general pattern of our average results.

  2. Free essay

    The acceleration of a ball down various inclines

    3 star(s)

    As the inclines got steeper, the ball would accelerate more quickly down the incline. The acceleration of the inclines also were mathematically connected, as the 'Average of difference in distance travelled per 0.5 sec' statistic increased by approximately 8.7 cm per 2� incline every 0.5 sec.

  1. Investigating the relationship between force, mass and acceleration

    Measure the trolleys new acceleration as it travels down the ramp. 6. Repeat this for a mass of 2kg. This varies the mass of the trolley while keeping the force constant. 7. Plot two graphs of your results.

  2. Investigating Force, Mass and Acceleration using a Trolley

    M = mass of trolley The hanging mass used is 0.06 kg which acts a force of (0.06g)

  1. Force of Friction experiment

    This may be due to varying degree of roughness throughout the contacting surface. Increase of contacting area increases chance of experiencing more uneven roughness. This will result in greater fluctuation of frictional force and thus greater experimental error. 7. Answers to Worksheet Questions Q.16 What is/are the advantage(s)

  2. Centripetal force

    3. Try to whirl the rubber bung in a horizontal circle in order to minimize the error.

  1. Centripetal motion. The objective of this experiment is to verify whether the tension ...

    0.273 0.278 0.286 0.286 0.298 0.306 0.303 0.302 0.302 0.314 0.333 0.347 0.331 0.331 0.362 0.358 0.362 0.361 0.361 Sources of error 1. As there was air resistance present to oppose the swirling motion of the rubber bung, this lowers the accuracy of the experiment.

  2. The Pulley System Investigation

    Evaluation I could improve my experiment if I repeat the test a few times to cancel any human errors such as wrong measurements which may occur during the measurement of the rope. Other measurements such as the weights may have been misunderstood due to their sizes which will vary accordingly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work