• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

OCR B Advancing Physics Physics Practical Investigation Coursework Investigating Simple Harmonic Oscillations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics Practical Investigation Coursework

Investigating Simple Harmonic Oscillations

This investigation aims to explore the nature of different oscillating systems, including the factors upon which the oscillation depends and the energy transfer involved.

Preliminary Experiment

A pendulum was made using a bob hanging, by a piece of string, from a standing clamp. Experiments were carried out, recording the time taken for ten complete cycles from angles of displacement ranging from 5 to 30° in 5° intervals.  In separate experiments, the mass and string length were changed as the independent variables in order to investigate the effect they had upon the period of oscillation. The mass of the bobs used were 100, 200 and 300g; the length of the string varying between 15cm and 30cm. For each experiment, three trials were completed in order to allow identification of anomalous results and enable the calculation of an average time – this value was then divided by ten in order to work out the average time of one oscillation.

Length of string: 0.15m

Average time for 1 oscillation (s)

Amplitude: Angle of initial displacement (degrees)

100g

200g

300g

5

1.08

1.08

1.09

10

1.08

1.09

1.09

15

1.09

1.09

1.09

20

1.08

1.09

1.08

25

1.09

1.10

1.09

30

1.09

1.10

1.09

Length of string: 0.3m

Average time for 1 oscillation (s)

Amplitude: Angle of initial displacement (degrees)

100g

200g

300g

5

1.31

1.32

1.31

10

1.32

1.33

1.32

15

1.32

1.33

1.32

20

1.32

1.33

1.33

25

1.33

1.33

1.33

30

1.33

1.34

1.33

For complete table of data, see appendix.

...read more.

Middle

A source of error could be that the surface area of the hanging mass does not remain constant – meaning there could be additional friction between mass and fluid with larger masses and consequentially a greater loss of energy.

The effect of the damping can be seen more easily by comparison between the two experiments.

image31.png

As can be seen in the graph, the resonant frequency is consistently lower in the damped system than in the undamped system.

Mass (kg)

Undamped Average Resonant
Frequency (Hz)

Damped Average Resonant
Frequency(Hz)

Difference (Hz)

% Difference

0.10

2.57

2.00

0.57

22.08

0.15

2.38

1.80

0.58

24.48

0.20

2.12

1.65

0.47

22.05

0.25

2.00

1.45

0.55

27.50

0.30

1.90

1.39

0.51

26.67

0.35

1.80

1.31

0.49

27.41

0.40

1.70

1.23

0.47

27.45


The damping effect reduces the resultant frequency by an average of 0.52Hz. The percentage decrease in resonant frequency increases slightly with mass – possibly due a greater surface area of larger masses as discussed above.

image23.pngimage32.png

To calculate an approximatepercentage change, where the lines of best fit are almost equal in gradient (0.4 and 0.44), the first point was removed. The intercepts differ by 7.92 meaning that, over this range of values, the amplitude is reduced by approximately 8cm by the damping effect of the water. As a percentage change this is:     (8/8.81) x 100 = 91%.

The reason that, in reality, the difference is not linear (especially in the undamped) system is the square relationship between amplitude and energy (E=1/2 kx2).

...read more.

Conclusion

an>

Trial 2

Trial 3

Average

Average time for 1 oscillation

5

10.71

10.80

10.82

10.78

1.08

10

10.82

10.80

10.92

10.85

1.08

15

10.86

10.87

10.86

10.86

1.09

20

10.83

10.82

10.87

10.84

1.08

25

10.88

10.90

10.90

10.89

1.09

30

10.87

11.00

10.93

10.93

1.09

Length 15cm

Time taken for 10 oscillations

Mass 200g

Angle of initial displacement (degrees)

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Average

Average time for 1 oscillation

5

10.74

10.84

10.89

10.82

1.08

10

10.90

10.93

10.95

10.93

1.09

15

10.89

10.84

10.90

10.88

1.09

20

10.84

10.93

11.01

10.93

1.09

25

10.98

11.00

10.93

10.97

1.10

30

11.02

11.02

11.02

11.02

1.10

Length 15cm

Time taken for 10 oscillations

Mass 300g

Angle of initial displacement (degrees)

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Average

Average time for 1 oscillation

5

10.76

10.80

11.01

10.86

1.09

10

10.84

10.79

10.92

10.85

1.09

15

10.82

10.90

10.86

10.86

1.09

20

10.80

10.89

10.85

10.85

1.08

25

10.84

10.90

11.01

10.92

1.09

30

10.89

11.00

10.90

10.93

1.09

image16.png

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Undamped

  Mass (kg)

Resonant Frequency

Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

Resonant Frequency

Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

Resonant Frequency

Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

Average Resonant Frequency

Average Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

0.10

2.60

5.00

2.60

5.50

2.50

5.50

2.57

5.33

0.15

2.40

9.50

2.40

9.00

2.35

9.00

2.38

9.17

0.20

2.10

10.00

2.15

10.20

2.10

10.60

2.12

10.27

0.25

2.00

10.20

2.00

10.50

2.00

11.20

2.00

10.63

0.30

1.90

10.90

1.90

11.20

1.90

11.25

1.90

11.12

0.35

1.80

11.00

1.80

11.40

1.80

11.30

1.80

11.23

0.40

1.70

11.20

1.70

11.30

1.70

11.45

1.70

11.32

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Damped

Mass (kg)

Resonant Frequency

Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

Resonant Frequency

Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

Resonant Frequency

Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

Average Resonant Frequency

Average Amplitude of Resonant Frequency

0.10

2.00

1.50

2.00

1.50

2.00

1.60

2.00

1.53

0.15

1.80

2.20

1.80

1.60

1.80

1.70

1.80

1.83

0.20

1.70

3.00

1.60

2.00

1.65

2.00

1.65

2.00

0.25

1.45

2.30

1.45

2.60

1.45

2.10

1.45

2.33

0.30

1.40

3.00

1.40

3.30

1.38

3.70

1.39

3.15

0.35

1.32

3.60

1.30

3.60

1.30

3.50

1.31

3.57

0.40

1.25

4.00

1.20

4.20

1.25

4.00

1.23

4.07

Anomalous results (in red) are not included in averages.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

  1. Investigating the factors affecting tensile strength of human hair.

    91.35 -84.45 40.75 -47.65 ( O - E ) 2 8345 7132 1661 2271 (( O - E ) 2) / E 40.519 34.629 8.063 11.025 X2 = 40.519 + 34.629 + 8.063 + 11.025 X2 = 94.235 To calculate the degrees of freedom to be used can be found as follows: * Number of categories minus 1.

  2. The Spinners Investigation.

    spinner gets smaller the time taken to reach the floor decreases too. My results and what I have found out match the prediction I made at the beginning before the experiment had been carried out. Evaluation My results or anyone else's can not be 100% accurate because there is always

  1. Force of Friction experiment

    Effect of surface area on friction Theoretically, friction is independent of contacting area. The result should be the same when the blocks are arranged side by side and piled up. However experimental results show that friction when side by side is slightly greater than that when piled up.

  2. Carry out an experiment of simple harmonic motion using a simple pendulum and determine ...

    Analysis of Results The gradient of the graph can be calculated from ?? and is equal to 2( ?? (g ?? = 1.18 = 1.98 ?? 0.595 1.98 = 2( = 6.2 (g (g (g = 6.2 1.98 = (3.13 g = 3.13� g = 9.8ms(� Conclusion The value I

  1. Physic lab report - study the simple harmonic motion (SHM) of a simple pendulum ...

    = 90�), and the acceleration graph should lead the velocity by also a quarter of the cycle. This can be illustrated by the fig. 2(a), (b) and (c). Fig. 2(a): Graph of displacement x against time (Suppose the motion starts at the point where lower amplitude is obtained)

  2. Mass on a spring - and investigation into resonance

    Mass (Kg) 1/M (1/kg) Resonant Frequency 1 (Hz) Resonant Frequency 2 (Hz) Resonant Frequency 3 (Hz) Average Resonant Frequency (f) (Hz) f� (Hz�) 0.107 9.35 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.37 5.62 0.205 4.88 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.67 2.79 0.303 3.30 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.43 2.04 0.400 2.50 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.27

  1. Helicopter Investigation

    it would be brought back downwards because the weight of the water forces the balloon to be brought back down again. What do I expect in the graph outcome? It is easily said that when a line graph is drawn out to show the results of the investigation that I

  2. Science 1 Investigating thedeflection of a cantilever.

    4.7 7 5.9 8 6.7 9 7.7 10 8.4 Conclusion and Analysis When drawing my graph I noticed that the line was very straight. I think that the reason for this is because we added the same amount of weight each time, but if we were to add different amounts of weight then the graph would fluctuate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work