• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Only God has the right to interfere with our Genes'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Only God has the right to interfere with our Genes' Firstly, I have split opinions about the above statement, my reason for agreeing are as follows. I think that God, being the creator should be the only one who is allowed to interfere with our genes. It is wrong that people other than god should be allowed to change the way our child looks and the qualities it has. My view backs up the fact that medical technology has gone too far over the years. In another light, I disagree with this statement because it could also be a good idea for doctors or whoever to interfere with our genes if it is going to stop hereditary diseases such as cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy and diabetes and the cure the 'incurable'. ...read more.

Middle

The idea of Genetic Engineering gives the impression that humans are treated no different to plants. My opinion on Genetic Engineering is that it should only be allowed in some circumstances. I can understand why people would like to use genetic engineering but I also think it is unnecessary in the case of something minor or something very extreme. An example of extremism is cloning; I think that it is ridiculous to clone someone, as everyone should be different and not interfered with. An example of a minor case; changing the way someone looks, definitely not needed. I believe that scientists have gained the power to do what used to seem like the impossible. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Roman Catholics' view is half and half. They think that genetic Engineering is permissible, as long as Embryos aren't used. They agree with the Strong Christians on some of the reasons but not all. They say, unlike the Christians, that killing an Embryo is like killing a life. Other Christians are negative and say that God has created life and no one has the right to interfere with what God wants and try to make the earth and its being perfect. Some Muslims share this view. To conclude, I would say that I do and don't agree with the statement ' Only God has the right to interfere with our genes'. I have looked at the Muslim and Christian responses and they tend to agree with my views. Gemma Whitehead 10He ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Cloning - reasons for

    So the clone would be a normal human and not some monster or something. It is no different than regular twins with respect that they are just not born at the same time. One of the most beneficial and probably one of the most important arguments for cloning is the

  2. "Only god has the right to interfere with our genes"

    This view is very similar to the ones shared by the Liberal Protestants denomination of Christianity because they both say that genetic engineering is acceptable as long as it isn't used to create 'designer babies' and that it is the same as finding cures using drugs etc.

  1. Only God has the right to interfere with our genes'.

    with anyone likely to develop an illness or die young being refused, and therefore being discriminated against. Some Christians are against genetic engineering for many reasons. God created the genetic make up of each person at conception, and we have no right to interfere with this.

  2. 'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' - Do you agree ...

    Stem cell research was banned In the UK because the Human Fertilisation and Embryology act said that the technology could only be used to treat infertility. I consider this an absurdity that this morally debateable technology was permitted to treat infertility but not to cure disease!

  1. 'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' Do you agree? Give ...

    Another reason as to why religions may be against scientists interferring is because the parents may choose ceratin features to be included in their child and this would be like creating a designer baby, which would mean you are altering Gods original creation of children on donors.

  2. Oncogenes are genes that cause cancer.

    And they de not transform cells in culture. Both forms of oncogenesis are characterized by the persistence of the viral genome in the host cell for as long as the cell survives. In most instances viral DNA has been integrated, or chemically stitched, into the DNA of the host cell,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work