• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religion can be both a conservative force and an initiator of social change- To what extent do sociological arguments and evidence support this view of religion?

Extracts from this document...


Religion Essay: "Religion can be both a conservative force and an initiator of social change"- To what extent do sociological arguments and evidence support this view of religion? (40 marks) This essay title addresses a major debate in sociology between the different schools of thought. Marxists, Functionalists and Feminists all believe religion is a conservative force, but for different reasons. Whereas, other schools of thought believe that religion can serve different purposes at different time, in some cases it can be a conservative force and at other times, it can be an initiator of change. The main debate is between Marx and Weber. A traditional Marxist view- advocated by Karl Marx- views religion as a conservative force, a force that discourages social change. They believe that religion is part of the ruling class apparatus which legitimises their position. An example of this is the monarchs in medieval Europe ruled by divine right- their position is God-given, which discourages attempts to change the situation. Marx states that religion is 'the opium of the people'- it provides consolation for the misery of their oppression by offering the false promise of eternal happiness in the next life. This illusion of happiness makes life appear bearable and therefore discourages attempts by the subject class to change their situation. ...read more.


Parsons also believes that religion gives meaning to life and makes sense of it. It helps people to accept their situation and not to question why some people do better than others. Religion promises that if they suffer in this life, then they will be rewarded in the next. Some have criticised Functionalists views on religion, claiming that they fail to address instances of religion as a force for social change. Max Weber presents an argument against Marx's view that religion is largely shaped by economic factors. Weber argues that in certain cases religion can help to shape entire economic systems and bring radical changes to society as a whole- the complete opposite! In his book, 'The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism', he claims that a number of Protestant religions which developed in 16th century Europe produced the ideas which were essential for the development of capitalism. For example these religions promoted values such as; hard work, self-discipline and a condemnation of time-wasting and laziness. If Weber is correct, then religion can sometimes be a significant force for social change. However, a number of researchers claim that Weber was wrong and that capitalism came first and helped to produce Protestantism. In recent years, there has been a rise in religious fundamentalism. ...read more.


Nelson argues that an example such as this indicates how religion can 'spearhead resistance and revolution'. Although, for every example of this, there is another which shows religion encouraging the opposite response. For example, in the USA, some Black religious groups discouraged civil rights protests. Nelson's point is that in certain times and places, religion can be either a conservative or a radical force. Another sociologist, Meredith McGuire asks the question, 'In what way and under what conditions does religion promote rather than inhibit change?' She says that religions with strong moral codes are more likely to be critical of the wider society and as a result, their members are more likely to demand change. She identifies that where religious beliefs are central to the culture of society, they are more likely to be used to justify or legitimate demands for stability or change. She also says that if religious institutions are closely integrated with other parts of the social structure- for example, the political and economic systems- they have greater power to produce stability or change. Finally, she states that, religious institutions with a strong, centralised authority will have more power to affect stability or change. In conclusion I believe that is impossible to delegate religion as a whole to being either a radical force or a conservative force. It can be either depending on the situation- time and place. This will continue to be a major debate throughout Sociology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the extent to which religion produces social change. Many sociologists such as functionalists ...

    beliefs might integrate a social group, those same beliefs may have repercussions which in the long term can produce changes in society. Weber examines the relationship between certain forms on Protestantism and the development of western industrial capitalism. Weber claims that a particular form of Protestantism, ascetic Calvinist Protestantism developed capitalism.

  2. Sociology cannot and should not be a science To what extent do sociological arguments ...

    it can produce hypotheses that can be tested and in theory falsified by using these hypotheses. The second is Thomas Kuhn and Scientific Paradigms. A shared framework held by members of any given scientific community. The paradigm provides a definition of science and a set of shared ideas, assumptions and methods, allowing them to do productive work.

  1. Free essay

    Is religion a conservative force or a force for social change?

    An example of this can be seen in the Victorian hymn 'All Things Bright and Beautiful' which lyrics state "the rich man in his castle, the poor man at his gate, God made them high and lowly, to order his estate".

  2. Assess the view that religion was once mainly a conservative force but today is ...

    Italian sociologist Antonion Gramsci also shared this view, and was well aware of the control religion had over its members, which he termed hegemony, but argued that the church's subservience to the state and Bourgeoisie interests was not necessarily inevitable.

  1. Analyse and Evaluate the relationships between religion and social change.

    However, functionalist, Marxist and feminism argues that religion acts as a conservative force. The key concern of functionalist writing on religion is the contribution that religion makes to the well being of society, its contribution to social stability and, value-consensus.

  2. Religion can be both a conservative force and an initiator of social change to ...

    Religious thinking, practice and institutions are becoming less important both in the lives of individuals and in society. Therefore religion is declining so how can Durkheim say its Bonding people together. Malinowski agrees with Durkheim that religion promotes solidarity. However he suggests that it does this by promoting psychological functions for individuals He saw.

  1. Assess the view that sociological arguments and evidence support functionalist views of the role ...

    islanders were said to see the need to take part in religious rituals beforehand, thus supporting Malinowski?s Crises of Life. Talcott Parsons also supports the idea of religion bringing social solidarity. He believed that in times of crisis looking towards religion for answers that could not be found elsewhere was

  2. The relationship between religious beliefs, religious organisations and social groups is complex and diverse. ...

    She supports the Marxist perspective and suggests that religion is oppressive and serves to control and reimburse the second class status given to woman. Which is similar to Marx?s viewpoint on the polerteriants who believe religion gives women a false belief that they will be compensated for their suffering on earth by equality in heaven.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work