• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the Pluralist theory of the media and ownership

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Wasim Mohammed 441588 Assess the Pluralist theory of the media and ownership The mass media is the means by which messages and images are communicated to a mass audience, it does this through its various Mass Communication Technologies (MCTs), for instance the Internet is a very powerful and influential MCT communicating worldwide. MCTs educate, persuade and inform as well as entertain their audience. Media is geographically dispersed and has no limits due to its global domination. It is also culturally diverse and socially mixed. Pluralists believe that the mass media is reflective of social reality, and acts as a 'mirror'. They state that it has a functional role in meeting the demands of its mass audience, and thus owes a duty to the people. ...read more.

Middle

Pluralists also share the view that media content is reflective of the audiences interests, an example of this is how coverage of 'immigrants' is often very negative in 'The Sun', a tabloid newspaper. Pluralists feel that media is responsive to both market and public demand. The audience is a dictator in terms of what it wants in media content. Burnham argued that the mergers and takeovers are irrelevant due to the emergence of Joint Stock Companies. His 'managerial thesis' also recognised that ownership and control is detached due to the fact it is impossible for individuals such as Rupert Murdoch to make every decision regarding media. ...read more.

Conclusion

The structuralist Marxists would state that there is an immense competition and a fierce rivalry within and between the mass media, as a result of which a conspiracy of the powerful can not exist. They would also declare that the personal influence of owners is diminished due to the pressure exerted by market forces. Thus overall, Pluralists main view regarding media and ownership is that there is no influence of owners, mainly due to the audiences role as a dictator and the fact that power is not concentrated and is dispersed allowing for different groups to become influential. There arguments can be subject to criticism as owners are a regulating authority with the possession of command, in other words they are highly involved in their business, and this may be due to competition as stated by Structuralist Marxists (above). [20] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Assess the pluralists view on media ownership

    Another factor supporting the post modernist view is that due to the rapid advance of technology producing live satellite links its hard for anyone [including bourgeoisies, therefore no matter how high up in the hierarchy one is] its mere impossible to maintain any sort of control over live media coverage.

  2. Moral Panic and media folk devils.

    Prince Harry was subject to the media attention after he was found smoking cannabis and drinking alcohol. This was dealt with differently than if it was any other person and caused panic as people then thought that every child in the country was taking illegal drugs and drinking before they are eighteen.

  1. The issue of media ownership is a complex one and therefore, I look to ...

    Another case to consider is the Berlusconi in which there was a clear link between this concentrated ownership of the media and a dangerous decrease in the diversity of the political opinions available to society by the media.

  2. Sociology Structural Theory and The Media

    The media has a great impact on how people in society understand how they live. From the functionalist perspective the role of the media is to firstly give information across society and is also used as a form of social control by broadcasting to the population values that reflect a particular society.

  1. Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion?

    Giddens sites people who shout at the TV as an example of this. The individual is shouting but obviously nobody will return the communication. Thompson believes that mediated quasi-interaction is the type of interaction that has come to be most dominant, similar to Baudrillard's view.

  2. What do the Pluralists say about the media generally?

    Individuals can accept, challenge or reject these sources of information. The media themselves are relatively independent in respect of the state, political parties, pressure groups. They are also relatively autonomous in their production of media content. Rather than serving the interests of class capitalism, the control of the media rests with a managerial elite who allow a degree of flexibility.

  1. Does violence in the media effect peoples behaviours and opinions?

    commit a crime based on the effects of the media alone according to this finding. 2. Has TV ever influenced your actions or mood before? This is related to the aim 1 as psychologists have suggested that people may mimic TV and film characters behaviour.

  2. Assess the pluralist view of media ownership

    Nevertheless, Pluralists stand up to scrutiny arguing that in the new media age any new company can be set up, ensuring competition. Moreover, regulations are effective enough to ensure no one company dominates the media. Pluralists view the media owners as interested in profits rather than promoting their ideology, thus

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work