• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the Pluralist theory of the media and ownership

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Wasim Mohammed 441588 Assess the Pluralist theory of the media and ownership The mass media is the means by which messages and images are communicated to a mass audience, it does this through its various Mass Communication Technologies (MCTs), for instance the Internet is a very powerful and influential MCT communicating worldwide. MCTs educate, persuade and inform as well as entertain their audience. Media is geographically dispersed and has no limits due to its global domination. It is also culturally diverse and socially mixed. Pluralists believe that the mass media is reflective of social reality, and acts as a 'mirror'. They state that it has a functional role in meeting the demands of its mass audience, and thus owes a duty to the people. ...read more.

Middle

Pluralists also share the view that media content is reflective of the audiences interests, an example of this is how coverage of 'immigrants' is often very negative in 'The Sun', a tabloid newspaper. Pluralists feel that media is responsive to both market and public demand. The audience is a dictator in terms of what it wants in media content. Burnham argued that the mergers and takeovers are irrelevant due to the emergence of Joint Stock Companies. His 'managerial thesis' also recognised that ownership and control is detached due to the fact it is impossible for individuals such as Rupert Murdoch to make every decision regarding media. ...read more.

Conclusion

The structuralist Marxists would state that there is an immense competition and a fierce rivalry within and between the mass media, as a result of which a conspiracy of the powerful can not exist. They would also declare that the personal influence of owners is diminished due to the pressure exerted by market forces. Thus overall, Pluralists main view regarding media and ownership is that there is no influence of owners, mainly due to the audiences role as a dictator and the fact that power is not concentrated and is dispersed allowing for different groups to become influential. There arguments can be subject to criticism as owners are a regulating authority with the possession of command, in other words they are highly involved in their business, and this may be due to competition as stated by Structuralist Marxists (above). [20] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Assess the pluralists view on media ownership

    Another factor supporting the post modernist view is that due to the rapid advance of technology producing live satellite links its hard for anyone [including bourgeoisies, therefore no matter how high up in the hierarchy one is] its mere impossible to maintain any sort of control over live media coverage.

  2. Moral Panic and media folk devils.

    This report makes the public feel that the USA is being cruel and unfair on these prisoners even but also causes controversy as many will think they deserve what they get while others will find there treatment shocking. * Social Class.

  1. To what extent do the media effects an individual's self-identity?

    So these magazines see women as sex objects. I couldn't prove my hypothesis by simply conducting a content analysis as my opinions as a feminist could be selective and my interpretations could then overlook the study. So in order to avoid this, I decided to conduct some short, informal interviews with 3 women.

  2. The issue of media ownership is a complex one and therefore, I look to ...

    In studying the diversity of suppliers and its affects on society, we can see that media ownership is of great significance with the continuous debate of when such ownership becomes an exploitation of power, influencing the content of its products.

  1. Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion?

    However, he sees this freedom as having been destroyed by the mass media or 'culture industry' as Adorno and Horkheimer discussed. The nature of communication was changed forever by the commercialisation and sensationalism of newspapers and journals and instead has been replaced by a political show where appearance and image have become everything.

  2. What do the Pluralists say about the media generally?

    The media give access to a wide range of opinions, rather than the views of a dominant elite as the Frankfurt School would have argued. In theory everyone has a voice in the media - and gradual change is possible through the competition of different groups and different ideas.

  1. Does violence in the media effect peoples behaviours and opinions?

    * To study whether or not these opinions change between younger and older generations and also if parenthood affects people's opinions. 1. Does heavy TV viewing make you more aggressive and irritable? This question is linked to aim 1 as it provides insights into whether people believe media violence increases the number of violent crimes committed.

  2. Assess the pluralist view of media ownership

    Nevertheless, Pluralists stand up to scrutiny arguing that in the new media age any new company can be set up, ensuring competition. Moreover, regulations are effective enough to ensure no one company dominates the media. Pluralists view the media owners as interested in profits rather than promoting their ideology, thus

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work