• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method Participant observation is when the researcher joins in with the group he/she is studying to get a deeper insight into their lives. The researcher must go through three phases; getting in, staying in and getting out. This means that to begin the study, the researcher must first gain entry to the group. Then, once accepted, the researcher needs to be able to stay in the group to complete the study and finally, the researcher needs to be able to leave the group without any harm once the observation has been completed. There are two types of participant observation; covert and overt. Covert is where the study is carried out 'under cover'. The researcher's real identity and purpose are kept concealed from the group being studied. The researcher takes a false identity and role, usually posing as a genuine member of the group. On the other hand, overt is where the researcher reveals his or her true identity and purpose to the group and asks permission to observe. ...read more.

Middle

Participant observation is unlikely to produce reliable data, as each time there is a different researcher, who has their own characteristics and skills. As a result, positivists reject participant observation as an unsystematic method because it cannot be replicated by other researchers. Also, another disadvantage of using participant observation is that it is very time-consuming. For example, William Whyte's study of 'Street Corner Society', took him 4 years to complete. A further disadvantage is that the researcher needs to be trained, to be able to recognise aspects of a situation that are sociologically significant and worth further attention. For instance, if a new sociologist was the conduct a participant observation, without training, then they would not know what to look out for and what aspects are serious, that will need further attention. Moreover, the researcher's age, gender or ethnicity will be a drawback. It may restrict what kinds of groups they can study. However, in the past, some researchers have gone to great lengths to pass, to look like a member of the group. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, using overt participant observation also has disadvantages. For example, unlike covert, it creates the Hawthorne Effect, which is where the participants, who are being observed, act differently, which undermines the validity of the data. Although, pretending to be an insider rather than an outsider can still affect the validity of the study. It reduces the risk of the Hawthorne Effect, but the addition of a new member can still change the group's behaviour, which also reduces the validity. In conclusion, sociologists who prefer to gain a deeper insight, using firsthand experience would prefer to use covert participant observation. Whereas, sociologists who would rather keep their identity and ask whether they can observe the group, would prefer overt participant observation. Marxists and functionalists argue that because participant observation focuses on the 'micro' levels of actors' meanings; it tends to ignore the wider structural forces that shape our behaviour, such as class inequality or the norms and values into which we are socialised. Therefore, seeing things only through the actors' eyes will never give us the complete picture. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ayshe Caluda ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of interviews, as a research method

    more opportunity to ask questions about the topics they think are important. Also, unstructured interviews are widely seen as a way of gathering valid data and enabling researchers to get a deeper understanding of the interviewee's world. A practical disadvantage for unstructured interviews is that they take a long time to conduct as they are all in-depth explorations.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of questionnaires, as a research method

    In addition, feminists may also prefer this method as they are used to being questioned by doctors, midwives and others. Therefore, questionnaires can be seen as more advantageous to positivists (who favour questionnaires as they believe they are reliable and objective), than to feminists and interpretivists, who claim they lack

  1. Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

    Positivist sociologists believe that human behaviour is determined by social facts and these are the way societies are organised. They therefore believe that sociology should be a scientific discipline based on the logic and methods of the natural sciences. The job of sociologists, according to positivists, is to uncover the social laws that govern human behaviour.

  2. Advantages and disadvantages of covert and overt participation

    It could also mean that the researcher may be involved in criminal or dangerous activities. An example is that of James Patrick when researching Glasgow gangs. Overt participation involves the researcher being open about the reason for his or her study.

  1. Demography topic revision notes. The study of populations and their characteristics is called ...

    However, from about the 1950s, medical factors began to play a greater role. For example, mass immunization against childhood diseases such as whooping cough, diphtheria and later measles, the use of antibiotics to fight infection and improved midwifery and obstetric techniques, all contributed to a continuing fall in IMR.

  2. Choice of research method. here are various types of research methods available, such ...

    Hence, a sociologist who favors structural approach tends to prefer quantitative research methods such as questionnaires and experiments in studying the social world. On the other hand, interpretivists such as symbolic interactionists see social action can only be understood by interpreting the meanings and motives it is based on, which is unable to be discovered through quantitative methods.

  1. Examine the problems sociologists may find when using participant observation in their research.

    This denies those who read the published study a full and objective account of the research. Gaining entry into a group can be very difficult and may take a long time for acceptance. Some groups are easier than others though.

  2. Critically Assess Observation Methods.

    Covert observation also helps to avoid problems with the Hawthorne Effect- as the research subjects would be unaware of the researcher's presence or interest. Observation methods also allow researchers to gain access to groups that usually would not be accessible through other methods e.g.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work