• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method

Extracts from this document...


Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method Participant observation is when the researcher joins in with the group he/she is studying to get a deeper insight into their lives. The researcher must go through three phases; getting in, staying in and getting out. This means that to begin the study, the researcher must first gain entry to the group. Then, once accepted, the researcher needs to be able to stay in the group to complete the study and finally, the researcher needs to be able to leave the group without any harm once the observation has been completed. There are two types of participant observation; covert and overt. Covert is where the study is carried out 'under cover'. The researcher's real identity and purpose are kept concealed from the group being studied. The researcher takes a false identity and role, usually posing as a genuine member of the group. On the other hand, overt is where the researcher reveals his or her true identity and purpose to the group and asks permission to observe. ...read more.


Participant observation is unlikely to produce reliable data, as each time there is a different researcher, who has their own characteristics and skills. As a result, positivists reject participant observation as an unsystematic method because it cannot be replicated by other researchers. Also, another disadvantage of using participant observation is that it is very time-consuming. For example, William Whyte's study of 'Street Corner Society', took him 4 years to complete. A further disadvantage is that the researcher needs to be trained, to be able to recognise aspects of a situation that are sociologically significant and worth further attention. For instance, if a new sociologist was the conduct a participant observation, without training, then they would not know what to look out for and what aspects are serious, that will need further attention. Moreover, the researcher's age, gender or ethnicity will be a drawback. It may restrict what kinds of groups they can study. However, in the past, some researchers have gone to great lengths to pass, to look like a member of the group. ...read more.


On the other hand, using overt participant observation also has disadvantages. For example, unlike covert, it creates the Hawthorne Effect, which is where the participants, who are being observed, act differently, which undermines the validity of the data. Although, pretending to be an insider rather than an outsider can still affect the validity of the study. It reduces the risk of the Hawthorne Effect, but the addition of a new member can still change the group's behaviour, which also reduces the validity. In conclusion, sociologists who prefer to gain a deeper insight, using firsthand experience would prefer to use covert participant observation. Whereas, sociologists who would rather keep their identity and ask whether they can observe the group, would prefer overt participant observation. Marxists and functionalists argue that because participant observation focuses on the 'micro' levels of actors' meanings; it tends to ignore the wider structural forces that shape our behaviour, such as class inequality or the norms and values into which we are socialised. Therefore, seeing things only through the actors' eyes will never give us the complete picture. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ayshe Caluda ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of questionnaires, as a research method

    In addition, feminists may also prefer this method as they are used to being questioned by doctors, midwives and others. Therefore, questionnaires can be seen as more advantageous to positivists (who favour questionnaires as they believe they are reliable and objective), than to feminists and interpretivists, who claim they lack

  2. Demography topic revision notes. The study of populations and their characteristics is called ...

    These include the family, the dependency ratio, the public services and policies. The family Smaller families mean that women are more likely to be free to go out to work, thus creating the dual earner couple typical of many professional families.

  1. Choice of research method. here are various types of research methods available, such ...

    Besides, by conducting qualitative research methods such as participant observation, where the researcher is witnessing the actual behavior, it is more difficult for the people being studied to lie or mislead the researcher.

  2. METHODOLGY The research design sets out how the researcher will collect evidence and ...

    Participant observation is the main research method used in ethnographic sociology. 'Ethnography' simply means 'writing about a way of life'. Participant observation is a form of qualitative data used by Interactionists. In participant observation study, the researcher, like Stott and Reicher in item B, joins the group or social situation that is being studied.

  1. Participant Observation

    to be truthful or not depending on the situation they are studying. For some types of research there may be no good alternative to participant observation. Certain unusual groups or behaviour would not be possible to study using any other method.

  2. Examine The Problems That Some Sociologists May Find When Using Participant Observations In Research

    It can also be incredibly dangerous, for example, in Harlambos (1994), study, he was, 'threatened with guns on more than one occasions during his research into African-American music on the south side of Chicago'3. Another disadvantage of conducting participant observations is the fact that is reduces objectivity.

  1. Critically Assess Observation Methods.

    Covert observation also helps to avoid problems with the Hawthorne Effect- as the research subjects would be unaware of the researcher's presence or interest. Observation methods also allow researchers to gain access to groups that usually would not be accessible through other methods e.g.

  2. Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

    Positivist sociologists believe that human behaviour is determined by social facts and these are the way societies are organised. They therefore believe that sociology should be a scientific discipline based on the logic and methods of the natural sciences. The job of sociologists, according to positivists, is to uncover the social laws that govern human behaviour.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work