• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches to our sociological understanding of crime and deviance

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches to our sociological understanding of crime and deviance This essay will be looking at the usefulness of different functionalist approaches to crime and deviance. To do this it will be looking at the psychological causes of crime by Lombroso, the role of crime and deviance in society by Durkheim, the strain to anomie, 5 adaptations study by Merton, the status theory by Cohen the Opportunity structures study by Cloward an Ohlin and the focal concerns study by Miller. When looking at these studies it will also be looking at the advantages and disadvantages of each study. This will then be followed by a conclusion. The psychological causes of crime study by Lombroso looks at why people commit crime from a biological point of view. His research claimed that there were genetically-determined characteristics found in the "criminal classes" such as, large jaws, high cheekbones and large ears. To find this out, he carried out his study on inmates in Italian prisons. One of the main disadvantages of this study was that it was carried out on people from poor backgrounds; whose physical appearance may have been affected by poverty and poor nutrition meaning that he was basing his study on people who had been socially deprived. ...read more.

Middle

This places some people in a position where they are tempted to use any means in achieving their goals and getting to the top. Merton also identified 5 main adaptations to common goals. These are Conformists, Ritualists, Retreatists, Innovators and Rebels. Merton claims that crime and deviance is a result of a lack of balance between means and goals during periods of social change. One of the good points about this study was that it was one of the first attempts to explain crime and deviance in terms of culture. This is useful as it helps us to understand the cultural reasons for why people commit crimes. It was also good because it provided an alternative to the previous biological and psychological theories. An advantage was that it explained crime and deviance in terms of working class people and it also started the development of further theories. However there are also disadvantages to this theory one of the main ones being the fact that there are so many unanswered questions such as why it's not all people that adopts the deviant adaptations. ...read more.

Conclusion

Miller's study on focal concerns approached the situation differently suggesting that deviancy was linked to the culture of lower-class males. He argued that working class males have six 'focal concerns' that are likely to lead to delinquency; these being trouble, toughness, smartness, fate and autonomy. Miller believed that young lower class males were pushed towards crime and also that we should see delinquent sub-cultures as an independent cultural phenomenon that is an extension of the lower (working) class. A criticism of this argument is that it provides little evidence to show that these are specifically working class values as they could easily apply to males of higher class. In conclusion we see that all together, that despite their flaws, all the theories have distinctive positive aspects which all help to explain why people commit crime and deviance. However, what they lack is an explanation to why those in higher classes commit white collar crimes. They all mainly focus on the crimes that are committed by those of the working class ignoring that fact that there is a high amount of crime being committed by those who are higher up in class. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lola Ake A2 Sociology ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the Usefulness of Official Crime Statistics to a Sociological Understanding of Crime

    4 star(s)

    These showed that the BCS under reported the higher levels of victimization of ethnic minority groups and domestic violence. Croall [1998] The Interactionist discards the accuracy of crime statistics and instead focuses on understanding the way they are socially constructed.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    crime and result in different systems of justice for disadvantaged and privileged groups. Not without its weaknesses, however, critics point out that laws protect most people, not just the affluent, as conflict theorists argue. In addition, although conflict theory offers a powerful analysis of the origins of crime, it is less effective in explaining other forms of deviance.

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    Other theories tend to offer a more suitable explanation to the maturation reform. David Matza wrote his drift theory and proposed that juvenile males drift out of deviant activity by the time they are in their early twenties. Gordon Tasler wrote about a situational theory that suggested that many young

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    However, "Strain Theory" can be criticized, namely by Interactionists who would challenge his claim of everyone sharing similar ends. They would instead point to the differences in objectives between different societies, as well as clear anomalies (as seen in Merton's theoretical views)

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    Durkheim is the forerunner, not only of positivist-functionalist theories of deviance, but also of labelling theory because it is clear that he regards societal reaction and labelling, not the intrinsic character of an act, but as the defining characteristic of what is seen as a criminal or deviant act.

  2. Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance.

    with its own definition of success goals and means of how to achieve them. This theory was able to explain collective crime, non utilitarian crime and delinquent crime. However, he has been criticised as his theory assumes that everybody wants societies success goals: Taylor, Walton and Young give the example

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    Similarly drug users are often deemed unemployable and consequently develop illegal habits. Becker did also point out that this process is not inevitable - not every individual that has been labelled will change his or her self-concept according to the label.

  2. Assess the usefulness of interpretive approaches to the study of suicide.

    Interpretive approaches, therefore, may well be more useful and valid than positivistic approaches when looking at the sociological issue of suicide in society today. Positivists, however, would argue that certain interpretive approaches lack any usefulness at all in the study of suicide.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work